In: Statistics and Probability
Is this statement true? Why?
The level of significance and sample size shows that the hypothesis can be rejected. The p value in most cases would increase with the sample size. If the sample sizes becomes larger they are subjected to cause the hypothesis to reject. This happens in companies all the time in many different areas. For instance, lets say a company is running a huge marketing campaign. More than often certain companies or even small companies will only choose to do marketing on that type of scale if they know that their sales will increase. If the sample size increase this opens the door for the hypothesis (the thought of people buying into the company after marketing) to be rejected. I tried to look more into the book and understand this. If anyone has input I would love the constructive criticism.
In statistics, a sample refers to the observations drawn from a population. Sample size is used in market research and defines the number of subjects that should be included within a sample. Having the right sample size is crucial in finding a statistically significant result. The larger the sample size, the more reliable the results; however, larger sample size means more time and money
To determine the right sample size for market research we need to take care of following
A larger sample size should hypothetically lead to more accurate or representative results, but when it comes to surveying large populations, bigger isn't always better. In fact, trying to collect results from a larger sample size can add costs – without significantly improving your results.