In: Physics
What is the difference between window level and window width?
Answer:
Exposure index (EI) is the measure of the amount of exposure received by the image receptor (IR). It is dependent on mAs, total detector area irradiated, and beam attenuation. The exposure index is indicative of the image quality. Equipment manufacturers provide a recommended EI range for optimal image quality (Bontrager & Lampignano, 2005, p. 52).
The Internet allows you to access information from anywhere, and at any time. However, the knowledge you retrieve may be a confusing collection of information in a wide variety of formats. Online information, along with your print resources, must ALWAYS be evaluated for relevance, currency, reliability, accuracy and coverage.
For example, I read on a website that Adolf Hitler escaped Germany at the end of the war in a U-boat and traveled to a German base in Antarctica.
Another website claims that DR has greater spatial resolution and uses less radiation dose than CR
Both these claims are ridiculous, yet one of them keeps turning up in a CSU Wagga prac report ( and it does not involve a U-boat!)
EI in digital radiography can be compared to film speed and
blackening in film-screen. When film was used, the accuracy of the
exposure was obvious based on the appearance of the image. Digital
systems post-process images and display adequate contrast and
brightness at a much wider range. Therefore, adequate exposure can
only be assessed through image noise or burn-out. Secondary
workstations such as those used by technologists for image review,
are often of lower resolution and brightness than those used for
diagnosis. Because of this, it is often difficult to assess whether
an image is noisy or not. The exposure index is meant to be an
indication of whether the noise levels are acceptable (AAPM,
2009).
Errors in the calculation can occur resulting in an inaccurate EI.
This can arise when the software fails in determining which part of
the image is the patient anatomy, for example, in the presence of
gonadal shielding or prosthesis. EI cannot be solely relied on,
therefore the technologist must remain critical of the appearance
of the image and the accuracy of the EI (AAPM, 2009).
EI is derived from the mean detector entrance exposure which is
derived from the mean pixel value of the image. Most systems use a
histogram analysis in order to calculate the mean pixel value
(Neitzel, 2004, p. S231).
This is a histogram created from an AP pelvis radiograph. The x-axis represents the pixel value while the y-axis represents the number of pixels with that value. The mean pixel value here is 104.381.
Although EI is always derived from the IR exposure, equipment
manufacturers calculate the numeric value differently, resulting in
different ranges and definitions (Carlton & Adler, 2006, p.
367; Neitzel, 2004, p. S231). Also, there is variation between
units purchased from the same manufacturer based on different IRs
and software (Carlton & Adler, 2006, p. 367). Different IRs
have different detective quantum efficiency (DQE). A high DQE
results in lower noise levels (AAPM, 2009, p. 3). Therefore, all
systems have a different index and are difficult to compare across
systems.
Fuji CR
Fuji uses a sensitivity number (S) that is related to the amount of
amplification required by the photomultiplier tube to adjust the
digital image. S is inversely proportional to exposure. Properly
exposed images should have an S between 150-250 (Carlton &
Adler, 2006, p. 367).
Kodak CR
Kodak uses the term Exposure Index, which is directly proportional
to exposure. Properly exposed images should have an EI between
1,800-2,200 (Carlton & Adler, 2006, p. 367). A change of 300 in
the EI indicates a change of a factor of 2 in the exposure to the
IR.
Agfa CR
Agfa uses log median exposure (LgM). This system compares the
exposure level of the image to a baseline established for the
department. Since it is based on a log system, an increase of 0.3
means the dose was doubled (Carlton & Adler, 2006, p. 367). An
optimal exposure lies between 1.9 and 2.5.
Philips DR
Philips uses an EI that is inversely proportional to exposure. This
index is represented in bigger discrete steps (eg., 100, 125, 160,
200, 250, 320, 400, 500, etc). Each step requires a 25% change in
exposure to occur (AAPM, 2009). An optimal exposure lies between
200 and 800.
Imaging Dynamics DR
Imaging Dynamics uses f#. The f# compares the exposure to an
established target exposure. Negative values represent
underexposure, while positive values indicate overexposure (AAPM,
2009).
Canon DR
Canon uses a reached exposure value (REX). REX is a function of the
brightness and contrast as selected by the operator (AAPM,
2009).
GE DR
GE uses the detector exposure index (DEI) which compares the
detector exposure to the expected exposure value (AAPM,
2009).
Siemens
Siemens uses an Exposure Index (EXI). EXI is calculated by dividing
the field into a 3x3 matrix and assessing only the central segment,
and is based on the selected organ program. EXI is directly
proportional to dose. Doubling dose doubles the EXI. EXI depends on
organ program, whether manual exposure or AEC was used, and the
measuring field (AAPM, 2009).