Question

In: Accounting

onestoga Corporation operates manufacturing facilities in State P and State Q. In addition, the corporation owns...

onestoga Corporation operates manufacturing facilities in State P and State Q. In addition, the corporation owns nonbusiness rental property in State Q. Conestoga incurred the following compensation expenses:

   State P    State Q     Total
Manufacturing wages $650,000 $450,000 $1,110,000
Administrative wages 340,000 180,000 520,000
Officers' salaries 320,000 100,000 430,000

Sixty percent of the time is spent by the administrative staff located in State Q and 30% of the time spent by officers located in State Q are devoted to the operation, maintenance, and supervision of the rental property. Both states exclude such rent income from the definition of apportionable income.

Round your answers to four decimal places before converting to a percentage. If required, round your final answers to two decimal places.

Conestoga's payroll factor for State P is % and for State Q is %.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Let us calculate everything in % terms first. Based on the information given above we can derive at below table

Owned Rented
Description Total State P State Q
Manufacturing Wages 1100000      0.6000      0.4000
Administrative Wages 520000      0.6538      0.3462
Office Salaries 430000      0.7000      0.3000
Factor      1.9538      1.0462

Hence by apportioning the given information we can determine the factors of state P and Q now by converting the same in percentage terms we can determine the payroll factor as stated below:

Total Factor      3.0000
A B C = A/B
State P      1.9538      3.0000 0.6513 Payroll Factor State P
State Q      1.0462      3.0000 0.3487 Payroll Factor State Q

Payroll Factor

State P = 0.6513 or 65.13%

State Q = 0.3487 = 34.87%


Related Solutions

Conestoga Corporation operates manufacturing facilities in State P and State Q. In addition, the corporation owns...
Conestoga Corporation operates manufacturing facilities in State P and State Q. In addition, the corporation owns nonbusiness rental property in State Q. Conestoga incurred the following compensation expenses:    State P    State Q     Total Manufacturing wages $650,000 $450,000 $1,110,000 Administrative wages 340,000 180,000 520,000 Officers' salaries 320,000 100,000 430,000 Sixty percent of the time is spent by the administrative staff located in State Q and 30% of the time spent by officers located in State Q are devoted to the operation,...
FOR EAICH PAIR OF PROPOSITIONS P AND Q STATE WHETHER ON NOT p=q p=(s→(p ∧¬r)) ∧...
FOR EAICH PAIR OF PROPOSITIONS P AND Q STATE WHETHER ON NOT p=q p=(s→(p ∧¬r)) ∧ ((p→(r ∨ q)) ∧ s), Q=p ∨ t
ABC Manufacturing Corp. is a private company that operates three manufacturing facilities. Each manufacturing facility produces...
ABC Manufacturing Corp. is a private company that operates three manufacturing facilities. Each manufacturing facility produces one of the three product lines ABC sells. ABC purchased the facilities using nonrecourse debt. (Nonrecourse debt is a loan that is secured by a pledge of collateral, in this case the facility, but for which the borrower is not personally liable. If the borrower defaults, the lender can seize the collateral, but the lender’s recovery is limited to the collateral.) Each facility is...
A corporation operates snow sports facilities in Canada. The corporation has an opportunity to lease a...
A corporation operates snow sports facilities in Canada. The corporation has an opportunity to lease a location in the mountains for 10 years for $60,000 per year to open a new snow sports location. They will also have access to trails in the provincial park at an additional cost of $24,000 per year for trail maintenance. To secure the lease they paid a non-refundable deposit of $10,000 last year. The corporation will be required to purchase snowshoes, cross-country skis and...
a) Northwest Inc. operates manufacturing facilities in Portland Oregon and Vancouver, Canada. In the current year,...
a) Northwest Inc. operates manufacturing facilities in Portland Oregon and Vancouver, Canada. In the current year, the Portland plant generated $3.1 million net domestic taxable income and the Vancouver plant generated $4.8 million net foreign taxable income. The Vancouver plant is not held through a Canadian subsidiary. What is Northwest's current year taxable income? b) In the example above, how much U.S. tax could Northwest save in the current year if it held its Vancouver plant through a Canadian subsidiary?...
4. Todor owns a U.S. corporation that operates a subsidiary corporation in Bulgaria. Because of the...
4. Todor owns a U.S. corporation that operates a subsidiary corporation in Bulgaria. Because of the world wide tax approach adopted in the United States, all income of the Bulgarian subsidiary is potentially taxed twice, once in Bulgaria and again in the United States. Name and provide a brief description of the adjustments available on the U.S. return of the parent corporation which mitigate the impact of this potential double tax on all Bulgarian income?
A monopolist operates in a market of demand q = 10−p with a total cost of...
A monopolist operates in a market of demand q = 10−p with a total cost of C(Q, e) = (3/2)e^2 +(5−e)Q, where e represents effort. a. Calculate the price, effort, quantity, and welfare that results from an unregulated monopoly. b. A regulator establishes that price must equal marginal cost. The monopolist is free to select the level of effort. Calculate price, effort, quantity, and welfare in this situation. c. A regulator decides to force price equal to marginal cost and...
(c) (¬p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) and p (d) (p → q) ∨ p...
(c) (¬p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) and p (d) (p → q) ∨ p and T I was wondering if I could get help proving these expressions are logically equivalent by applying laws of logic. Also these 2 last questions im having trouble with. Rewrite the negation of each of the following logical expressions so that all negations immediately precede predicates. (a) ¬∀x(¬P(x) → Q(x)) (b) ¬∃x(P(x) → ¬Q(x))
ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States....
ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying useable years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2015 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of...
ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States....
ABC Energy Corp. (the “Company”), an SEC registrant, operates three manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company manufactures various household cleaning products at each facility, which are sold to retail customers. The U.S. government granted the Company emission allowances (EAs) of varying useable years (i.e., the years in which the allowance may be used) to be used between 2015 and 2030. Upon receipt of the EAs, the Company recorded the EAs as intangible assets with a cost basis of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT