Explain inductive arguments and their importance to the field of science.Next, demonstrate the problem of induction...

Explain inductive arguments and their importance to the field of science.Next, demonstrate the problem of induction as presented by David Hume.This must include a discussion of the principle of the uniformity of nature.Why is this problematic for the field of science?Can science overcome this problem Why or why not?

Expert Solution

Inductive reasoning is very much important in the field of science because it involves logical arguments. It incorporates concepts of generalizations based on scientific observations. Such types of reasoning and arguments are mostly used for making various hypothesis.

It also assists in development of various scientific theories. Different different patterns remain the base of inductive reasoning. Those patterns form the base of logical reasoning. Inductive reasoning also helps us in determining and predicting the next step of the sequence.

David Hume claimed the fact that inductive reasoning may lead us in a state of confusion. It may also lead to a state of dilemma because we can not be fully assured about our beliefs. It can be understood through an example.

Suppose there are two boys and their grandfathers are bald. We know that baldness is common in old age. If we start trusting the pattern that all the grandfathers will be bald, then this may lead to a wrong information. We need to test our beliefs through minute and detailed observations.

We need to testify our statements through various practical experiments. We need to identify the areas in which the patterns are followed without any doubts. For example, laws of physics will be be same in every condition. When we become able to make a distinguish among reliable and non reliable incidents then only better predictions can be made with the involvement of critical thinking and appropriate reasoning.

Hayet Jeridi answered 2 months ago

explain the differences between deductive and inductive arguments? and what the scientific argumentor processare inductive? what...

explain the differences between deductive and inductive arguments? and what the scientific argumentor processare inductive? what kind are deductive?

Select the statement that is true of inductive arguments. a.) Hypothetical arguments are considered to be...

Select the statement that is true of inductive arguments. a.) Hypothetical arguments are considered to be inductive arguments. b.) Inductive arguments never intend logical certainty, only probability. c.) Inductive reasoning is rarely used because most reasoning is deductive. d.) Inductive arguments are less reasonable than deductive arguments.

Discuss some of the differences between causal arguments and both inductive generalizations and analogous arguments. Also...

Discuss some of the differences between causal arguments and both inductive generalizations and analogous arguments. Also discuss the difference between making a causal argument and establishing true causation, if there is any. Can you provide an example?

Explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments and further give three inference rules (e.g., Modus,...

Explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments and further give three inference rules (e.g., Modus, Ponens), illustrating them with examples.

`` 1.What is induction? 2.How does one assess the goodness or badness of an inductive argument?...

`` 1.What is induction? 2.How does one assess the goodness or badness of an inductive argument? 3. How are controlled an example of induction?

Generalizations are types of Inductive arguments that: Makes its conclusion about a thing, concept, or group,...

Generalizations are types of Inductive arguments that: Makes its conclusion about a thing, concept, or group, based on a sample of results from its whole. Makes comparisons between two or more things with the intent of conveying similarities between them. Implies that because one thing happens, a result will then occur, often when these connections are not absolutely guaranteed. None of these choices.

Explain the inductive affect in acids and bases

Discuss the arguments used to justify trade restrictions and critically appraise them. Explain the importance of...

Discuss the arguments used to justify trade restrictions and critically appraise them. Explain the importance of a country’s balance of payments accounts. Analyze the relationship between a current account deficit/surplus and a capital account deficit/surplus. Discuss the factors that determine exchange rates. Explain why the value of the dollar fluctuates and the importance of understanding this.

find and post examples of deductive and inductive arguments. for each example, evaluate its logical strength

*find and post examples of deductive and inductive arguments. *for each example, evaluate its logical strength

WEEK #6: VALIDITY, STRENGTH, AND DETERMINING WHETHER ARGUMENTS ARE INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE ASSIGNMENT 1: A. Determine...

WEEK #6: VALIDITY, STRENGTH, AND DETERMINING WHETHER ARGUMENTS ARE INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE ASSIGNMENT 1: A. Determine whether the following deductive arguments are valid or invalid. 1. New York City is either in the U.S.A. or France. But it's not in France. It follows that New York City is in France. 2. If the moon is made of green snot, then there are boogers on the moon. The moon is made of green snot; therefore, there are boogers on the moon....

Question