In: Accounting
Daryl Kearns saved $240,000 during the 30 years that he worked
for a major corporation. Now he has retired at the age of 60 and
has begun to draw a comfortable pension check every month. He wants
to ensure the financial security of his retirement by investing his
savings wisely and is currently considering two investment
opportunities. Both investments require an initial payment of
$160,000. The following table presents the estimated cash inflows
for the two alternatives:
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | |||||||||
Opportunity #1 | $ | 44,000 | $ | 47,200 | $ | 63,200 | $ | 80,000 | ||||
Opportunity #2 | 81,600 | 86,400 | 16,000 | 16,000 | ||||||||
Mr. Kearns decides to use his past average return on mutual fund
investments as the discount rate; it is 8 percent. (PV of $1 and
PVA of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables
provided.)
Required
Compute the net present value of each opportunity. Which should Mr. Kearns adopt based on the net present value approach?
Compute the payback period for each opportunity. Which should Mr. Kearns adopt based on the payback approach?
Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.
Compute the net present value of each opportunity. Which should Mr. Kearns adopt based on the net present value approach? (Round your intermediate calculations and final answer to two decimal places.)
|
Compute the payback period for each opportunity. Which should Mr. Kearns adopt based on the payback approach?
|
Requirement-a:
Calculation of Net Present Value of Opportunity 1 (Amounts in $)
Year | Cash Inflows (i) | PVF @ 8% (ii) | PV of Cash Inflows (i*ii) |
1 | 44,000 | 0.92593 | 40,740.92 |
2 | 47,200 | 0.85734 | 40,466.45 |
3 | 63,200 | 0.79383 | 50,170.06 |
4 | 80,000 | 0.73503 | 58,802.40 |
Present Value of Cash Inflows | 190,179.83 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | 160,000.00 | ||
Net Present Value | 30,179.83 |
Therefore the net present value of opportunity 1 is $30,179.83.
Calculation of Net Present Value of Opportunity 2 (Amounts in $)
Year | Cash Inflows (i) | PVF @ 8% (ii) | PV of Cash Inflows (i*ii) |
1 | 81,600 | 0.92593 | 75,555.89 |
2 | 86,400 | 0.85734 | 74,074.18 |
3 | 16,000 | 0.79383 | 12,701.28 |
4 | 16,000 | 0.73503 | 11,760.48 |
Present Value of Cash Inflows | 174,091.83 | ||
Less: Initial Investment | 160,000.00 | ||
Net Present Value | 14,091.83 |
Therefore the net present value of opportunity 2 is $14,091.83.
As the net present value of opportunity 1 is higher than the second one, thus, Daryl Kearns should chose opportunity 1.
Requirement-b:
Calculation of Payback Period for Opportunity 1 (Amounts in $)
Year | Cash Inflows | Cumulative Cash Inflows |
1 | 44,000 | 44,000 |
2 | 47,200 | 91,200 |
3 | 63,200 | 154,400 |
4 | 80,000 | 234,400 |
Payback period = 3 yrs + [(160,000-154,400)/80,000]
= 3 yrs + 0.07
= 3.07 years
Calculation of Payback Period for Opportunity 2 (Amounts in $)
Year | Cash Inflows | Cumulative Cash Inflows |
1 | 81,600 | 81,600 |
2 | 86,400 | 168,000 |
3 | 16,000 | 184,000 |
4 | 16,000 | 200,000 |
Payback period = 1 yr + [(160,000-81,600)/86,400]
= 1 yr + 0.91
= 1.91 years
As the payback period is shorter for opportunity 2, Daryl Kearns should chose opportunity 2.
Please rate positively if this helped you,
All the best!