In: Math
Absenteeism is a major problem for some companies and in some industries. Suppose a study was conducted on absenteeism in the warehousing industry. Observations on several variables that might be related to absenteeism were collected on 35 major warehouses in the Pacific Northwest.
Absent: The average number of absences per employee for the year (does not include vacation days or confirmed sick days)
Wage: The average annual wage paid to the warehouse employees (does not include manager salaries)
Pct U: Union membership. The percentage of employees who belong to a union at the warehouse.
Good R: 1 if the employee group self-reported a “good” relationship with management; 0 if the employee group self-reported otherwise.
Perform a complete multiple regression analysis to find a model that might be useful for predicting the average number of absences per employee for the year. Perform ALL steps as outlined in class. Use Minitab and show all your work. Use alpha = .10 for any required tests (and show all steps for any required test). STAPLE MULTIPLE PAGES and include all required computer output.
| Absent | Wage | Pct U | Good R | 
| 5.4 | 42000 | 57.1 | 1 | 
| 4.1 | 39350 | 41.5 | 1 | 
| 11.5 | 31000 | 52.6 | 0 | 
| 2.1 | 28000 | 65.1 | 0 | 
| 5.9 | 30000 | 68.8 | 1 | 
| 12.9 | 28000 | 46.4 | 0 | 
| 3.5 | 40000 | 38.9 | 1 | 
| 2.6 | 35820 | 17.2 | 1 | 
| 8.6 | 29500 | 12.9 | 0 | 
| 2.7 | 29500 | 18.1 | 0 | 
| 6.6 | 36500 | 64.4 | 1 | 
| 2.1 | 39600 | 63.7 | 1 | 
| 3.8 | 31200 | 12.2 | 1 | 
| 4.3 | 32000 | 11.8 | 0 | 
| 4.3 | 29600 | 25.8 | 0 | 
| 2.2 | 37560 | 53.2 | 1 | 
| 8.6 | 32000 | 22.8 | 0 | 
| 10.8 | 22980 | 49.8 | 0 | 
| 2.9 | 32000 | 39.1 | 0 | 
| 5.3 | 42320 | 32.6 | 1 | 
| 8.2 | 29500 | 67.7 | 0 | 
| 2.8 | 36500 | 10.8 | 1 | 
| 2.4 | 37970 | 25.5 | 1 | 
| 2.8 | 35180 | 31.8 | 1 | 
| 5 | 29630 | 35 | 0 | 
| 9.5 | 39800 | 41.9 | 1 | 
| 4.3 | 41000 | 52.9 | 1 | 
| 8.9 | 32890 | 64.4 | 0 | 
| 7.2 | 27500 | 69.7 | 0 | 
| 5.6 | 27500 | 61.8 | 1 | 
| 2.4 | 40826 | 52.1 | 1 | 
| 2.7 | 31970 | 57.4 | 0 | 
| 13.4 | 29990 | 15.2 | 0 | 
| 14.8 | 31450 | 38.7 | 0 | 
| 10.7 | 36900 | 69.4 | 1 | 
Regression Analysis: Absent versus Wage, Pct U, Good R
Analysis of Variance
Source      DF   Adj SS Adj
MS F-Value P-Value
Regression   3   91.837
30.612     2.61    0.069
Wage       1   
2.264   2.264    
0.19    0.664
Pct U      1   
8.673   8.673    
0.74    0.397
Good R     1   24.989
24.989     2.13    0.155
Error       31 363.750 11.734
Total       34 455.587
Model Summary
      S    R-sq
R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
3.42547 20.16%    
12.43%       3.16%
Coefficients
Term          
Coef   SE Coef T-Value P-Value   VIF
Constant      
8.82      5.55    
1.59    0.122
Wage      -0.000077
0.000176    -0.44    0.664 2.25
Pct U       
0.0260    0.0303    
0.86    0.397 1.01
Good R       
-2.55      1.75   
-1.46    0.155 2.27
Regression Equation
Absent = 8.82 - 0.000077 Wage + 0.0260 Pct U - 2.55 Good R
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations
                           
Std
Obs Absent   Fit Resid Resid
33   13.40 6.91   6.49   2.01 R
34   14.80 7.41   7.39   2.23 R
R Large residual
Regression Equation
Absent = 8.82 - 0.000077 Wage + 0.0260 Pct U - 2.55 Good R