Question

In: Economics

Redistribution of income or wealth will be a dis-incentive to people working hard. This brings back...

Redistribution of income or wealth will be a dis-incentive to people working hard. This brings back memory of why the old communist blocks failed and free market continue to thrive till today. This is only possible in command economy where government have exclusive authority over the factor of production. I definitely agree with Amanda on that "People who earn lots of money often work harder or have innovative ideas etc ."

When income is redistributed, tendency abound for bandwagon effect to become the order of the day, since the generality of people will take that whether they work or not, everyone gets the same reward. At some point, those hard working and diligent among the society will have no motivation to up their game, while innovation and productivity will suffer including the economy at large.

In 175 words do you agree or not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Yes I do agree . Incentive is a thing that motivates or encourages you to do something . A prize or gold medal is the motivation for a runner , similarly economic success , wealth etc act as motivation for most enterpreneurs , managers , executives etc . Communist blocks failed due to lack of productivity . In command economy the government owns all factors of production and uses it in the best way possible . People when once come to know that whether they work or not everyone gets same reward the obvious tendency would be to not work and choose leisure instead . This is common rationality . Equity and efficiency are two opposite poles . The trade off for equity is efficiency or productivity . As in case of higher tax rates , here also hard working people do not want to invest their hard work . The economy at large will face low production , income and growth . So in every economy there should be a balance between equity and efficiency .


Related Solutions

Is it the inequality of income and wealth that people should be concerned with, or should...
Is it the inequality of income and wealth that people should be concerned with, or should people be concerned about something else (e.g. minimal welfare, opportunity, etc.)? Why or why not?  
“YOU’RE THE ECONOMIST: Pulling Back the Curtain on Income and Wealth Distribution” in Chapter 12. (1)...
“YOU’RE THE ECONOMIST: Pulling Back the Curtain on Income and Wealth Distribution” in Chapter 12. (1) What would happen to the Lorenz curve if it also included wealth distribution? (2) Do you think income and wealth are fairly or unfairly distributed? Should we be concerned with this issue? If you think we should be concerned with growing income and wealth inequality, what remedies would you recommend?
Income is a steady stream of money that people receive, while wealth is a stock of...
Income is a steady stream of money that people receive, while wealth is a stock of money that people have accumulated. For example, a paycheck represents income, while money in a savings account represents wealth. Would you rather: 1. Have $1 million dollars in an account, but no steady income, or 2. Have a steady income of $3000 per month, but no wealth? In which situation do you think you would be more careful about your spending?
We discussed the differences between income and wealth. In what ways might the lives of people...
We discussed the differences between income and wealth. In what ways might the lives of people who have income but little or no wealth be different from those who have both income and wealth?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT