Question

In: Economics

Describe each actor’s dominant strategy in each scenario. Indicate whether there is a Nash Equilibrium Suppose...

  1. Describe each actor’s dominant strategy in each scenario. Indicate whether there is a Nash Equilibrium
    1. Suppose that Angelina and Brad own the only two professional photography stores in town. Each must choose between a low price and a high price for senior photo packages. The annual economic profit from each strategy is indicated in the table below:

Angelina

Low price                           High price


Brad

Low price

Angelina’s profit = $20,000
Brad’s profit = $20,000

Angelina’s profit = $4,000
Brad’s profit = $23,000

High price

Angelina’s profit = $25,000
Brad’s profit = $5,000

Angelina’s profit = $22,000
Brad’s profit = $22,000

  1. Suppose that Robert and Howard own the only two movie studios in California. Each producer must choose between a low budget and a high budget strategy for his next film. The economic profit from each strategy is indicated in the table below

Howard

Low budget             High budget


Robert

Low budget

Howard’s profit = $19,000
Robert’s profit = $19,000

Howard’s profit = $4,000
Robert’s profit = $24,000

High budget

Howard’s profit = $25,000
Robert’s profit = $5,000

Howard’s profit = $21,000
Robert’s profit = $21,000

  1. Suppose that two coal mining companies – Allied and Barclay – own adjacent land suitable for excavating coal mines. The profits that each firm earns depends on both the number of mines it excavates and the number of mines excavated by the other firm. The table below lists each firm’s individual profits:

Allied

Excavate one mine              Excavate two mines


Barclay

Excavate one mine

Allied’s profit = $9 million
Barclay’s profit = $9 million

Allied’s profit = $11 million
Barclay’s profit = $6 million

Excavate two mines

Allied’s profit = $6 million
Barclay’s profit = $11 million

Allied’s profit = $7 million
Barclay’s profit = $7 million

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. Given that Brad choose low price, Angelina's best response is low price($20,000).
Given that Brad choose high price, Angelina's best response is low price($25,000).
So, Angelina's dominant strategy is low price as it is always chosen by her.

Given that Angelina choose low price, Brad's best response is low price($20,000).
Given that Angelina choose hgh price, Brad's best response is low price($23,000).
So, Brad's dominant strategy is low price as it is always chosen by him.

The NE is (Low price, Low price) = (Angelina’s profit = $20,000; Brad’s profit = $20,000) as their best response occur simultaneously at this set.

b. Given that Robert choose low budget, Harvard's best response is low budget(19,000).
Given that Robert choose high budget, Harvard's best response is low budget(25,000).
So, Robert's dominant strategy is low budget as it is always chosen by him.

Given that Harvard choose low budget, Robert's best response is low budget(19,000).
Given that Harvard choose high budget, Robert's best response is low budget(24,000).
So, Harvard's dominant strategy is low budget as it is always chosen by him.

The NE is (Low budget, Low budget) = (Harvard's profit = $19,000; Robert's profit = $19,000) as their best response occur simultaneously at this set.

c. Given that Barclay excavate one mine, Allied's best response is to excavate 2 mines($11 million).
Given that Barclay excavate two mines, Allied's best response is to excavate 2 mines($7 million).
So, Allied's dominant strategy is to excavate two mines.

Given that Allied excavate one mine, Barclay's best response is to excavate 2 mines($11 million).
Given that Allied excavate two mines, Barclay's best response is to excavate 2 mines($7 million).
So, Barclay's dominant strategy is to excavate two mines.

The NE is (Excavate two mines, Excavate two mines) = (Allied’s profit = $7 million; Barclay’s profit = $7 million) as their best response occur simultaneously at this set.


Related Solutions

1.What is Nash equilibrium? How does it differ from a dominant strategy? 2. Which of the...
1.What is Nash equilibrium? How does it differ from a dominant strategy? 2. Which of the following could be considered a monopolistic competitor? a. a local corn farmer b. the Tennessee Valley Authority, a large electricity producer c. pizza delivery d. a grocery store e. Kate Spade, fashion designer
8. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Andrew and Beth are playing a...
8. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Andrew and Beth are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Andrew chooses Right and Beth chooses Right, Andrew will receive a payoff of 4 and Beth will receive a payoff of 6. Beth Left...
Evaluate whether the statement is true or false. Explain why. a. Dominant strategy equilibrium is a...
Evaluate whether the statement is true or false. Explain why. a. Dominant strategy equilibrium is a Nash equilibrium. b. A Nash equilibrium is Pareto efficient. c. Every subgame perfect Nash equilibrium is a Nash equilibrium.
Discuss the Nash equilibrium and Mixed Strategy Nash equilibrium. a) Provide the definitions. b) Provide two...
Discuss the Nash equilibrium and Mixed Strategy Nash equilibrium. a) Provide the definitions. b) Provide two games, and illustrate the Nash equilibrium / equilibria and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium / equilibria for those games.
Argue that a strategy in a pure strategy Nash equilibrium must be (normal form) rationalizable.
Argue that a strategy in a pure strategy Nash equilibrium must be (normal form) rationalizable.
Prove that in a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of a finite strategic game, all the pure...
Prove that in a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of a finite strategic game, all the pure strategies that are assigned positive probabilities must have the same expected payoff.
For each of the following brief scenarios, indicate whether the HIGHEST ranking supervisor (in the scenario)...
For each of the following brief scenarios, indicate whether the HIGHEST ranking supervisor (in the scenario) acted in an appropriate manner and give reasons as to why or why not. 1. The purchasing manager for a firm had been bragging in the factory break room about the great deal that he got for the firm on some paper for the printing department of the organization. In the meantime, the manager of the printing department was discovering that the quality of...
For each of the following brief scenarios, indicate whether the HIGHEST ranking supervisor (in the scenario)...
For each of the following brief scenarios, indicate whether the HIGHEST ranking supervisor (in the scenario) acted in an appropriate manner and give reasons as to why or why not. 1. The Vice-President of Manufacturing notices that the manager of the Assembly Department has had an unfavorable direct labor variance of $40 to $80 for each of the past six months. The budgeted amount for direct labor in the Assembly Department each month is $50,000. The VP of Manufacturing assigns...
For each scenario, indicate whether it is an example of making a probability statement (about samples,...
For each scenario, indicate whether it is an example of making a probability statement (about samples, using knowledge about a population or parameters) or of inference (about a population or parameter, using data), briefly explaining why (1 sentence). (Example format: “Inference, because ___.”) a) Using a percentile chart, we figure out how likely it is one of the next 20 babies born in this hospital will be above the 99th percentile for weight. b) Through census data we know the...
Advantages of outsourcing Indicate whether each scenario in the following table is an example of outsourcing....
Advantages of outsourcing Indicate whether each scenario in the following table is an example of outsourcing. Scenario Outsourcing Not Outsourcing A French pharmaceutical company closes its own accounts payable department and hires a Swiss accounting firm to take care of this aspect of its business. The Skype office in the United States contracts an independently operated call center in India to handle telephone customer service. Apple decides to internally manufacture displays for iPhone products rather than working with Japanese and...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT