Question

In: Statistics and Probability

III. A study looked at n = 238 adolescents, all free of severe illness.22 Subjects wore...

III. A study looked at n = 238 adolescents, all free of severe illness.22 Subjects wore a wrist actigraph, which allowed the researchers to estimate sleep patterns. Those subjects classified as having low sleep efficiency had an average systolic blood pressure that was 5.8 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) higher than that of other adolescents. The standard deviation of the population difference is 21.6 mm Hg. Based on these results, test whether this difference is significant at the 0.01 level. State a conclusion.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Null hypothesis:- mean difference is not significant

Alternate hypothesis:- mean difference is significant (testing claim)

we have sample size n = 238, mean difference = 5.8 and standard deviation for difference = 21.6

Formula test statistics is given as

setting the values, we get

this gives us

degree of freedom = n-1 = 238-1 = 237

Using excel function tdist or t distribution with t value 4.413 and df = 237 for one tailed hypothesis, we get

p value = 0.000024

So, it is clear that the p value is less than 0.01 significance level, rejecting the null hypothesis as result is significant.

Thus, we can conclude that at 0.01 level of significance, the difference between mean is significant.

We have sufficient evidecen to conclude that the mean differene is significant at 0.01 level of significance.


Related Solutions

n a study of speed​ dating, male subjects were asked to rate the attractiveness of their...
n a study of speed​ dating, male subjects were asked to rate the attractiveness of their female​ dates, and a sample of the results is listed below ​(1=not ​attractive; 10=extremely ​attractive). Construct a confidence interval using a 99​% confidence level. What do the results tell about the mean attractiveness ratings of the population of all adult​ females? 5​, 7​, 2​, 9​, 4​, 6​, 7​, 8​, 7​, 10​, 6​, 8    What is the confidence interval for the population mean μ​?...
n a study of 420,112 cell phone​ users, 110 subjects developed cancer of the brain or...
n a study of 420,112 cell phone​ users, 110 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system. Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That​ is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of​ 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great​ importance, use a...
Question 6 options: In a study of n=76 subjects that were placed on a low-fat diet,...
Question 6 options: In a study of n=76 subjects that were placed on a low-fat diet, their sample mean weight loss was 2.2 kg. with a sample standard deviation of 6.1 kg. What is the test statistic for testing the mean weight loss is GREATER than 0? Note: Enter X.XX AT LEAST ONE DIGIT BEFORE THE DECIMAL, TWO AFTER and round up. Thus, 27 is entered as 27.00, 3.5 is entered as 3.50, 0.3750 is entered as 0.38 | |...
Question 6 options: In a study of n=76 subjects that were placed on a low-fat diet,...
Question 6 options: In a study of n=76 subjects that were placed on a low-fat diet, their sample mean weight loss was 2.2 kg. with a sample standard deviation of 6.1 kg. What is the test statistic for testing the mean weight loss is GREATER than 0? Note: Enter X.XX AT LEAST ONE DIGIT BEFORE THE DECIMAL, TWO AFTER and round up. Thus, 27 is entered as 27.00, 3.5 is entered as 3.50, 0.3750 is entered as 0.38 | |...
Study these definitions and prove or disprove the claims. (In all cases, n ∈ N.) Definition....
Study these definitions and prove or disprove the claims. (In all cases, n ∈ N.) Definition. f(n)→∞ifforanyC>0,thereisnC suchthatforalln≥nC,f(n)≥C.Definition. f(n)→aifforanyε>0,thereisnε suchthatforalln≥nε,|f(n)−a|≤ε. (a) f(n)=(2n2 +3)/(n+1). (i)f(n)→∞. (ii)f(n)→1. (iii)f(n)→2. (b) f(n)=(n+3)/(n+1). (i)f(n)→∞. (ii)f(n)→1. (iii)f(n)→2. (c) f(n) = nsin2(1nπ). (i) f(n) → ∞. (ii) f(n) → 1. (iii) f(n) → 2.
Even if you see ALL OF THE SUBJECTS in our theoretical blood glucose study have LOWER...
Even if you see ALL OF THE SUBJECTS in our theoretical blood glucose study have LOWER blood glucose after they take the medication, does that mean that the blood glucose worked? What other factors could be influencing a lower blood glucose among all the participants? Would those factors be confounders? Effect mediators? If you had to take into consideration all of those other factors, would you still do a t test?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT