Question

In: Accounting

Firms U and L

a. Assume that Firms U and L are in the same risk class, and that both have EBIT = $500,000. Firm U uses no debt financing, and its cost of equity is rsU = 14%. Firm L has $1 million of debt outstanding at a cost of rd = 8%. There are no taxes. Assume that the MM assumptions hold, and then:

(1) Find V, S, rs, and WACC for Firms U and L.

(2) Graph (a) the relationships between capital costs and leverage as measured by D/V, and (b) the relationship between value and D.

b. Using the data given in Part b, but now assuming that Firms L and U are both subject to a 40 percent corporate tax rate, repeat the analysis called for in b(1) and b(2) under the MM with-tax model.

c. Suppose that Firms U and L are growing at a constant rate of 7% and that the investment in net operating assets required to support this growth is 10% of EBIT. Use the compressed adjusted present value (APV) model to estimate the value of U and L. Also estimate the levered cost of equity and the weighted average cost of capital.

 

d. Suppose the expected free cash flow for Year 1 is $250,000 but it is expected to grow faster than 7% during the next 3 years: FCF2 = $290,000 and FCF3 = $320,000, after which it will grow at a constant rate of 7%. The expected interest expense at Year 1 is $80,000, but it is expected to grow over the next couple of years before the capital structure becomes constant: Interest expense at Year 2 will be $95,000, at Year 3 it will be $120,000 and it will grow at 7% thereafter. What is the estimated horizon unlevered value of operations (i.e., the value at Year 3 immediately after the FCF at Year 3)? What is the current unlevered value of operations? What is the horizon value of the tax shield at Year 3? What is the current value of the tax shield? What is the current total value? The tax rate and unlevered cost of equity remain at 40% and 14%, respectively.

e. Suppose there is a large probability that L will default on its debt. For the purpose of this example, assume that the value of L's operations is $4 million (the value of its debt plus equity). Assume also that its debt consists of 1-year, zero coupon bonds with a face value of $2 million. Finally, assume that L's volatility, σ is 0.60 and that the risk-free rate rRF is 6%.

f. What is the value of L's stock for volatilities between 0.20 and 0.95?

David Lyons, CEO of Lyons Solar Technologies, is concerned about his firm's level of debt financing. The company uses short-term debt to finance its temporary working capital needs, but it does not use any permanent (long-term) debt. Other solar technology companies average about 30% debt, and Mr. Lyons wonders why they use so much more debt and how it affects stock prices. To gain some insights into the matter, he poses the following questions to you, his recently hired assistant.

 

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. (1)            
Proposition I.            
1. The weighted average cost of capital is independent of the firm's capital structure.
2. The WACC of a firm with debt is equal to the unlevered cost of equity.  
             
Proposition II.            
The cost of equity, rsL = rsU + Risk premium = rsU + (rsU -rd)(D/S)  

 

MM without Taxes          
D V S D/V rd rs WACC
0.0 $3.50 $3.50 0.00% 8.00% 14.00% 14.00%
0.5 $3.50 $3.00 14.29% 8.00% 15.00% 14.00%
1.0 $3.50 $2.50 28.57% 8.00% 16.40% 14.00%
1.5 $3.50 $2.00 42.86% 8.00% 18.50% 14.00%
2.0 $3.50 $1.50 57.14% 8.00% 22.00% 14.00%

a. (2)

 

b.  
Modigliani and Miller with CorporateTaxes
The MM results are different once corporate taxes are added in.
   
Proposition I ( with corporate taxes)
Value of levered firm is the unlevered value plus the debt tax shield: VL = VU + TD
   
Proposition II (with corporate taxes)
The cost of equity to a levered firm is the unlevered cost of equity plus a risk premium:
rsL = rsU + (rsU - rd)(1-T)(D/S)

 

Effects of Leverage: MM Models            
               
MM with Corporate Taxes            
Tc =  40.00%            
D V S D/V rd rd x (1-T) rs WACC
0.0 $2.14 $2.14 0.00% 8.00% 4.80% 14.00% 14.00%
0.5 $2.34 $1.84 21.37% 8.00% 4.80% 14.98% 12.80%
1.0 $2.54 $1.54 39.37% 8.00% 4.80% 16.34% 11.80%
1.5 $2.74 $1.24 54.74% 8.00% 4.80% 18.35% 10.93%
2.0 $2.94 $0.94 68.03% 8.00% 4.80% 21.66% 10.19%
2.5 $3.14 $0.64 79.62% 8.00% 4.80% 28.06% 9.54%
3.0 $3.34 $0.34 89.82% 8.00% 4.80% 45.76% 8.97%
3.5 $3.54 $0.04 98.87% 8.00% 4.80% 329.00% 8.46%

c.              
Relevant information from part c.            
EBIT    500,000          
Tax rate   40%          
Unlevered cost of equity 14% = WACC if there is no debt      
Cost of debt   8%          
               
Additional information            
Required reinvestment  50,000          
growth rate   7%          
               
FCF Calculation              
NOPAT  = EBIT x (1-T)      
NOPAT  =  500,000 x 60%      
NOPAT  =  300,000          
               
FCF--7% growth   = NOPAT - Required net reinvestment at 7% growth
FCF--7% growth   =  300,000 -  50,000    
FCF--7% growth   =  250,000        
               
 FCF -- 0% growth     NOPAT         
 FCF -- 0% growth     300,000        

APV with growth: rTS = rsU.   growth =  7.00%    
T =  40.00%          
D V S D/V Tax shield rsL WACC
  $4,028,571 $3,028,571 24.823% $457,143 15.981% 13.206%
 -   3,571,429  3,571,429 0.00%  -  14.00% 14.00%
 500,000  3,800,000  3,300,000 13.16%  228,571 14.91% 13.58%
 1,000,000  4,028,571  3,028,571 24.82%  457,143 15.98% 13.21%
 1,500,000  4,257,143  2,757,143 35.23%  685,714 17.26% 12.87%
 2,000,000  4,485,714  2,485,714 44.59%  914,286 18.83% 12.57%
 2,500,000  4,714,286  2,214,286 53.03%  1,142,857 20.77% 12.30%
 3,000,000  4,942,857  1,942,857 60.69%  1,371,429 23.26% 12.06%
 3,500,000  5,171,429  1,671,429 67.68%  1,600,000 26.56% 11.83%

1.

The gain from the tax shield will be lower using the APV model than under MM because the APV model discounts the interest tax shield at the unlevered cost of equity, which is  larger than the cost of debt. The MM model discounts the tax shield at the cost of debt.

2.

The gain from debt is larger with growth than without growth.

3.

The value of the firm, whether levered or not, will be larger with growth, provided ROIC is greater than WACC. Although we don't show it here, ROIC is greater than WACC, so the value of the firm increases with growth.

The increase in the firm's value as a result of $1,000,000 in debt over its unlevered value is:
         
Increase in value =  12.80% of the unlevered value
         
MM versus APV rsL and WACC      
         
rd 8.0%      
rsU 14.00%      
Tax Rate 40%      
D/V 50%      
D/S 1      
MM rsL 17.60%      
MM WACC 11.20%      
APV rsL 20.00%      
APV WACC 12.40%      
         
  MM rsL MM WACC APV rsL APV WACC
D/V 17.60% 11.20% 20.00% 12.40%
0% 14.00% 14.00% 14.00% 14.00%
10% 14.40% 13.44% 14.67% 13.68%
20% 14.90% 12.88% 15.50% 13.36%
30% 15.54% 12.32% 16.57% 13.04%
40% 16.40% 11.76% 18.00% 12.72%
50% 17.60% 11.20% 20.00% 12.40%
60% 19.40% 10.64% 23.00% 12.08%
70% 22.40% 10.08% 28.00% 11.76%
80% 28.40% 9.52% 38.00% 11.44%

 

d.            
Inputs:     1 2 3  
Tax Rate = 40% Free Cash Flow $250.00 $290.00 $320.00  
rsU = 14.00% Interest expense $80.00 $95.00 $120.00  
gL = 7%          
             
Estimate the unlevered value of operations        
             
Unlevered Horizon Value = (Free Cash Flow)(1+g)      
rsU - g      
             
  Unlevered Horizon Value = $4,891.43 thousand      
             
      1 2 3  
Free Cash Flow     $250.00 $290.00 $320.00  
Unlevered Horizon Value       $4,891.43  
Total     $250.00 $290.00 $5,211.43  
             
Unlevered Value = PV at rsU = $3,960.01 thousand      
             
             
Estimate the value of the tax shield          
             
Tax Shield Horizon Value = ( Tax Shield)(1+g)      
rsU - g      
             
TS. Horizon Value = $733.71 thousand      
             
      1 2 3  
Interest tax shield     $32.00 $38.00 $48.00  
Tax shield horizon value       $733.71  
Total     $32.00 $38.00 $781.71  
             
Tax Shield Value = PV at rsU = $584.94 thousand      
             
Estimate the total value of operations          
             
    Vops = Tax shield value + Unlevered value = $4,544.95 thousand    
             
e.            
If L's debt is risky, then its equity is like a call option and can be valued with the Black-Scholes Option   
Pricing Model (OPM). See Chapter 6 for details of the OPM.      
             
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model          
Total Value of Firm 4.00 Analogous to the stock price from the BSOPM  
Face Value of Debt 2.00 Analogous to the exercise price    
Risk Free rate   0.06        
Maturity of debt (years) 1.00 Analogous to time to expiration of option  
Standard Dev.   0.60 This is the standard dev. of the total value of the firm, not just the stock.
d1   1.5552        
d2   0.9552        
N(d1)   0.9401        
N(d2)   0.8303        
Call Price = Equity Value  $ 2.1964        
             
Debt Value = Total Value - Equity Value    
  = 4.00 -  $ 2.1964 (all in millions)
  =  $ 1.8036        
             
 Debt yield  = (Face Value /Market Value)(1/N)-1    
 Debt yield  = 10.888%        
             
The value of L's equity must be $2.20 million. The value of its debt must be what is left over: $1.80 million.  
This gives a yield of 10.88% for the debt.        
             
f.            
Value of Stock and Debt for Different Volatilities        
  Equity Debt Debt yield      
Volatility  $ 2.20  $ 1.80 10.888%      
0.20 2.12 1.88 6.18%      
0.25 2.12 1.88 6.20%      
0.30 2.12 1.88 6.27%      
0.35 2.12 1.88 6.48%      
0.40 2.13 1.87 6.89%      
0.45 2.14 1.86 7.53%      
0.50 2.16 1.84 8.41%      
0.55 2.17 1.83 9.54%      
0.60 2.20 1.80 10.89%      
0.65 2.22 1.78 12.46%      
0.70 2.25 1.75 14.24%      
0.75 2.28 1.72 16.23%      
0.80 2.31 1.69 18.40%      
0.85 2.34 1.66 20.77%      
0.90 2.38 1.62 23.33%      
0.95 2.41 1.59 26.08%      

 


Related Solutions

Question 36 There are two firms: Firm U and Firm L. Both firms have $50M total...
Question 36 There are two firms: Firm U and Firm L. Both firms have $50M total assets and $8M EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes). Firm U is an unleveraged firm without debt. Firm L is a leveraged firm with 50% of debt and 50% of common equity. The pre-tax cost of debt for Firm L is 10%. Both firms have 40% corporate tax rate. Calculate the return on equity (ROE) for firm U. 9.6% 13.2% 16.0% 19.2% Question 37...
Assume that two firms, U and L, are identical in all respects except for one: Firm...
Assume that two firms, U and L, are identical in all respects except for one: Firm U is debt-free, whereas Firm L has a capital structure that is 50% debt and 50% equity by market value. Further suppose that the assumptions of M&M's "irrelevance" Proposition I hold (no taxes or transaction costs, no bankruptcy costs, etc.) and that each firm will have income before interest and taxes of $800,000. If the required return on assets, rA, for these firms is...
Assume the following data for two firms (U = unlevered firm) and (L = levered firm)....
Assume the following data for two firms (U = unlevered firm) and (L = levered firm). Assume the two firms are in the same risk class when it comes to business risk. Both firms have EBIT = €1000 000. Firm U has zero debt and its required rate of return (KsU = 12%). Firm L has €2000 000 debt and pays 10% interest rate. Based on the data provided, answer the following questions and show all your computations and interpret...
Companies U and L
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L has $10 million of 5% bonds outstanding. Both firms have an EBIT of $2 million. Assume that all of the MM assumptions are met.a. Suppose that both firms are subject to a 40% federal-plus-state corporate tax rate, investors in both firms face a tax rate of Td = 28% on debt income and Ts = 20% (on average) on stock income, and the appropriate...
Consider two firms L and U which are identical in all aspects except for capital structure....
Consider two firms L and U which are identical in all aspects except for capital structure. The EBIT and cost of capital for each firm is Sh. 900,000 and 10% respectively. U is an all-equity financed firm while L has 7.5% of Sh.4, 000,000 debt. a. Estimate the value of levered firm (L) and Unlevered firm (U) using Net Income (NI) approach; b. Establish whether there is an arbitrage opportunity c. Estimate the arbitrage profits if any by considering an...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L has $8 million of 6% bonds outstanding. Assume: (1) All of the MM assumptions are met. (2) Both firms are subject to a 25% federal-plus-state corporate tax rate. (3) EBIT is $3 million. (4) The unlevered cost of equity is 9%. What value would MM now estimate for each firm? (Hint: Use Proposition I.) Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer of...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L has $8 million of 5% bonds outstanding. Assume that: (1) All of the MM assumptions are met. (2) Both firms are subject to a 35% federal-plus-state corporate tax rate. (3) EBIT is $2 million. (4) The unlevered cost of equity is 10%. What value would MM now estimate for each firm? (Hint: Use Proposition I.) Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer...
Let L be a linear map between linear spaces U and V, such that L: U...
Let L be a linear map between linear spaces U and V, such that L: U -> V and let l_{ij} be the matrix associated with L w.r.t bases {u_i} and {v_i}. Show l_{ij} changes w.r.t a change of bases (i.e u_i -> u'_i and v_j -> v'_j)
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L has $10 million of 6% bonds outstanding. Assume: (1) All of the MM assumptions are met. (2) Both firms are subject to a 25% federal-plus-state corporate tax rate. (3) EBIT is $5 million. (4) The unlevered cost of equity is 12%. a.) What value would MM now estimate for each firm? (Hint: Use Proposition I.) Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L...
Companies U and L are identical in every respect except that U is unlevered while L has $8 million of 5% bonds outstanding. Assume: (1) All of the MM assumptions are met. (2) Both firms are subject to a 25% federal-plus-state corporate tax rate. (3) EBIT is $2 million. (4) The unlevered cost of equity is 12%. What value would MM now estimate for each firm? (Hint: Use Proposition I.) Enter your answers in millions. For example, an answer of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT