In: Accounting
a. Assume that Firms U and L are in the same risk class, and that both have EBIT = $500,000. Firm U uses no debt financing, and its cost of equity is rsU = 14%. Firm L has $1 million of debt outstanding at a cost of rd = 8%. There are no taxes. Assume that the MM assumptions hold, and then:
(1) Find V, S, rs, and WACC for Firms U and L.
(2) Graph (a) the relationships between capital costs and leverage as measured by D/V, and (b) the relationship between value and D.
b. Using the data given in Part b, but now assuming that Firms L and U are both subject to a 40 percent corporate tax rate, repeat the analysis called for in b(1) and b(2) under the MM with-tax model.
c. Suppose that Firms U and L are growing at a constant rate of 7% and that the investment in net operating assets required to support this growth is 10% of EBIT. Use the compressed adjusted present value (APV) model to estimate the value of U and L. Also estimate the levered cost of equity and the weighted average cost of capital.
d. Suppose the expected free cash flow for Year 1 is $250,000 but it is expected to grow faster than 7% during the next 3 years: FCF2 = $290,000 and FCF3 = $320,000, after which it will grow at a constant rate of 7%. The expected interest expense at Year 1 is $80,000, but it is expected to grow over the next couple of years before the capital structure becomes constant: Interest expense at Year 2 will be $95,000, at Year 3 it will be $120,000 and it will grow at 7% thereafter. What is the estimated horizon unlevered value of operations (i.e., the value at Year 3 immediately after the FCF at Year 3)? What is the current unlevered value of operations? What is the horizon value of the tax shield at Year 3? What is the current value of the tax shield? What is the current total value? The tax rate and unlevered cost of equity remain at 40% and 14%, respectively.
e. Suppose there is a large probability that L will default on its debt. For the purpose of this example, assume that the value of L's operations is $4 million (the value of its debt plus equity). Assume also that its debt consists of 1-year, zero coupon bonds with a face value of $2 million. Finally, assume that L's volatility, σ is 0.60 and that the risk-free rate rRF is 6%.
f. What is the value of L's stock for volatilities between 0.20 and 0.95?
David Lyons, CEO of Lyons Solar Technologies, is concerned about his firm's level of debt financing. The company uses short-term debt to finance its temporary working capital needs, but it does not use any permanent (long-term) debt. Other solar technology companies average about 30% debt, and Mr. Lyons wonders why they use so much more debt and how it affects stock prices. To gain some insights into the matter, he poses the following questions to you, his recently hired assistant.
a. (1) | ||||||
Proposition I. | ||||||
1. The weighted average cost of capital is independent of the firm's capital structure. | ||||||
2. The WACC of a firm with debt is equal to the unlevered cost of equity. | ||||||
Proposition II. | ||||||
The cost of equity, rsL = rsU + Risk premium = rsU + (rsU -rd)(D/S) |
MM without Taxes | ||||||
D | V | S | D/V | rd | rs | WACC |
0.0 | $3.50 | $3.50 | 0.00% | 8.00% | 14.00% | 14.00% |
0.5 | $3.50 | $3.00 | 14.29% | 8.00% | 15.00% | 14.00% |
1.0 | $3.50 | $2.50 | 28.57% | 8.00% | 16.40% | 14.00% |
1.5 | $3.50 | $2.00 | 42.86% | 8.00% | 18.50% | 14.00% |
2.0 | $3.50 | $1.50 | 57.14% | 8.00% | 22.00% | 14.00% |
a. (2)
b. | |
Modigliani and Miller with CorporateTaxes | |
The MM results are different once corporate taxes are added in. | |
Proposition I ( with corporate taxes) | |
Value of levered firm is the unlevered value plus the debt tax shield: VL = VU + TD | |
Proposition II (with corporate taxes) | |
The cost of equity to a levered firm is the unlevered cost of equity plus a risk premium: | |
rsL = rsU + (rsU - rd)(1-T)(D/S) |
Effects of Leverage: MM Models | |||||||
MM with Corporate Taxes | |||||||
Tc = | 40.00% | ||||||
D | V | S | D/V | rd | rd x (1-T) | rs | WACC |
0.0 | $2.14 | $2.14 | 0.00% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 14.00% | 14.00% |
0.5 | $2.34 | $1.84 | 21.37% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 14.98% | 12.80% |
1.0 | $2.54 | $1.54 | 39.37% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 16.34% | 11.80% |
1.5 | $2.74 | $1.24 | 54.74% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 18.35% | 10.93% |
2.0 | $2.94 | $0.94 | 68.03% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 21.66% | 10.19% |
2.5 | $3.14 | $0.64 | 79.62% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 28.06% | 9.54% |
3.0 | $3.34 | $0.34 | 89.82% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 45.76% | 8.97% |
3.5 | $3.54 | $0.04 | 98.87% | 8.00% | 4.80% | 329.00% | 8.46% |
c. | |||||||
Relevant information from part c. | |||||||
EBIT | 500,000 | ||||||
Tax rate | 40% | ||||||
Unlevered cost of equity | 14% | = WACC if there is no debt | |||||
Cost of debt | 8% | ||||||
Additional information | |||||||
Required reinvestment | 50,000 | ||||||
growth rate | 7% | ||||||
FCF Calculation | |||||||
NOPAT | = | EBIT | x | (1-T) | |||
NOPAT | = | 500,000 | x | 60% | |||
NOPAT | = | 300,000 | |||||
FCF--7% growth | = | NOPAT | - | Required net reinvestment at 7% growth | |||
FCF--7% growth | = | 300,000 | - | 50,000 | |||
FCF--7% growth | = | 250,000 | |||||
FCF -- 0% growth | = | NOPAT | |||||
FCF -- 0% growth | = | 300,000 |
APV with growth: rTS = rsU. | growth = | 7.00% | ||||
T = | 40.00% | |||||
D | V | S | D/V | Tax shield | rsL | WACC |
$4,028,571 | $3,028,571 | 24.823% | $457,143 | 15.981% | 13.206% | |
- | 3,571,429 | 3,571,429 | 0.00% | - | 14.00% | 14.00% |
500,000 | 3,800,000 | 3,300,000 | 13.16% | 228,571 | 14.91% | 13.58% |
1,000,000 | 4,028,571 | 3,028,571 | 24.82% | 457,143 | 15.98% | 13.21% |
1,500,000 | 4,257,143 | 2,757,143 | 35.23% | 685,714 | 17.26% | 12.87% |
2,000,000 | 4,485,714 | 2,485,714 | 44.59% | 914,286 | 18.83% | 12.57% |
2,500,000 | 4,714,286 | 2,214,286 | 53.03% | 1,142,857 | 20.77% | 12.30% |
3,000,000 | 4,942,857 | 1,942,857 | 60.69% | 1,371,429 | 23.26% | 12.06% |
3,500,000 | 5,171,429 | 1,671,429 | 67.68% | 1,600,000 | 26.56% | 11.83% |
1.
The gain from the tax shield will be lower using the APV model than under MM because the APV model discounts the interest tax shield at the unlevered cost of equity, which is larger than the cost of debt. The MM model discounts the tax shield at the cost of debt.
2.
The gain from debt is larger with growth than without growth.
3.
The value of the firm, whether levered or not, will be larger with growth, provided ROIC is greater than WACC. Although we don't show it here, ROIC is greater than WACC, so the value of the firm increases with growth.
The increase in the firm's value as a result of $1,000,000 in debt over its unlevered value is: | ||||
Increase in value = | 12.80% | of the unlevered value | ||
MM versus APV rsL and WACC | ||||
rd | 8.0% | |||
rsU | 14.00% | |||
Tax Rate | 40% | |||
D/V | 50% | |||
D/S | 1 | |||
MM rsL | 17.60% | |||
MM WACC | 11.20% | |||
APV rsL | 20.00% | |||
APV WACC | 12.40% | |||
MM rsL | MM WACC | APV rsL | APV WACC | |
D/V | 17.60% | 11.20% | 20.00% | 12.40% |
0% | 14.00% | 14.00% | 14.00% | 14.00% |
10% | 14.40% | 13.44% | 14.67% | 13.68% |
20% | 14.90% | 12.88% | 15.50% | 13.36% |
30% | 15.54% | 12.32% | 16.57% | 13.04% |
40% | 16.40% | 11.76% | 18.00% | 12.72% |
50% | 17.60% | 11.20% | 20.00% | 12.40% |
60% | 19.40% | 10.64% | 23.00% | 12.08% |
70% | 22.40% | 10.08% | 28.00% | 11.76% |
80% | 28.40% | 9.52% | 38.00% | 11.44% |
d. | ||||||
Inputs: | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Tax Rate = | 40% | Free Cash Flow | $250.00 | $290.00 | $320.00 | |
rsU = | 14.00% | Interest expense | $80.00 | $95.00 | $120.00 | |
gL = | 7% | |||||
Estimate the unlevered value of operations | ||||||
Unlevered Horizon Value = | (Free Cash Flow)(1+g) | |||||
rsU - g | ||||||
Unlevered Horizon Value = | $4,891.43 | thousand | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Free Cash Flow | $250.00 | $290.00 | $320.00 | |||
Unlevered Horizon Value | $4,891.43 | |||||
Total | $250.00 | $290.00 | $5,211.43 | |||
Unlevered Value = PV at rsU = | $3,960.01 | thousand | ||||
Estimate the value of the tax shield | ||||||
Tax Shield Horizon Value = | ( Tax Shield)(1+g) | |||||
rsU - g | ||||||
TS. Horizon Value = | $733.71 | thousand | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Interest tax shield | $32.00 | $38.00 | $48.00 | |||
Tax shield horizon value | $733.71 | |||||
Total | $32.00 | $38.00 | $781.71 | |||
Tax Shield Value = PV at rsU = | $584.94 | thousand | ||||
Estimate the total value of operations | ||||||
Vops = Tax shield value + Unlevered value = | $4,544.95 | thousand | ||||
e. | ||||||
If L's debt is risky, then its equity is like a call option and can be valued with the Black-Scholes Option | ||||||
Pricing Model (OPM). See Chapter 6 for details of the OPM. | ||||||
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model | ||||||
Total Value of Firm | 4.00 | Analogous to the stock price from the BSOPM | ||||
Face Value of Debt | 2.00 | Analogous to the exercise price | ||||
Risk Free rate | 0.06 | |||||
Maturity of debt (years) | 1.00 | Analogous to time to expiration of option | ||||
Standard Dev. | 0.60 | This is the standard dev. of the total value of the firm, not just the stock. | ||||
d1 | 1.5552 | |||||
d2 | 0.9552 | |||||
N(d1) | 0.9401 | |||||
N(d2) | 0.8303 | |||||
Call Price = Equity Value | $ 2.1964 | |||||
Debt Value | = | Total Value | - | Equity Value | ||
= | 4.00 | - | $ 2.1964 | (all in millions) | ||
= | $ 1.8036 | |||||
Debt yield | = | (Face Value | /Market Value)(1/N)-1 | |||
Debt yield | = | 10.888% | ||||
The value of L's equity must be $2.20 million. The value of its debt must be what is left over: $1.80 million. | ||||||
This gives a yield of 10.88% for the debt. | ||||||
f. | ||||||
Value of Stock and Debt for Different Volatilities | ||||||
Equity | Debt | Debt yield | ||||
Volatility | $ 2.20 | $ 1.80 | 10.888% | |||
0.20 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 6.18% | |||
0.25 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 6.20% | |||
0.30 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 6.27% | |||
0.35 | 2.12 | 1.88 | 6.48% | |||
0.40 | 2.13 | 1.87 | 6.89% | |||
0.45 | 2.14 | 1.86 | 7.53% | |||
0.50 | 2.16 | 1.84 | 8.41% | |||
0.55 | 2.17 | 1.83 | 9.54% | |||
0.60 | 2.20 | 1.80 | 10.89% | |||
0.65 | 2.22 | 1.78 | 12.46% | |||
0.70 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 14.24% | |||
0.75 | 2.28 | 1.72 | 16.23% | |||
0.80 | 2.31 | 1.69 | 18.40% | |||
0.85 | 2.34 | 1.66 | 20.77% | |||
0.90 | 2.38 | 1.62 | 23.33% | |||
0.95 | 2.41 | 1.59 | 26.08% |