Question

In: Finance

1. Why do firms issue debt instead of only issuing equity? 2. Why do firms focus...

1. Why do firms issue debt instead of only issuing equity?

2. Why do firms focus on capital structure?

3. What do you think of a high profit firm like Microsoft with over 200 billion of cash and marketable securities on its balance sheet, would issue debt?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Generally, there are three reasons why firms issue debt instead of only issuing equity:-

a. Restrict the ownership be diluted

b. Interest acts as a taxshield

c. Return on equity gets increased

Lets discuss all the above reasons one by one.

a.The firms issue equity once they need to raise fund. Issuing equity means dilution of ownership of a firm. For example, before issuing an equity, 100% control is entitled to the firm itself, but after issuing an equity, the ownership is distributed to different shareholders who have the rights to vote on the decision taken by the firms. There is a possibility that company may loose control (< 50%) if continously diluted ownership to raise fund. That is why, firms issue debt to raise fund.

b. Once firms raise debt, they need to pay interest. Because of this interest expense, the firms need to pay less taxes. Lets try to understand this by the below example:

PARTICULARS Rs. Particulars Rs.
Total Revenue 60000 Total Revenue 60000
Total Expenses 40000 Total Expenses 40000
Profir Before Tax 20000 Gross Profit 20000
Tax (@30%) 6000 Interest Expense 5000
Profit After tax 14000 Profit Before Tax 15000
Tax @ 30% 4500
Profit After Tax & Interest 10500

First Case: Firm is paying Rs.6000 as a tax, since the firm has no debt

Second Case: Firm is paying Rs. 4500 as a tax, since the firm has issued debt.Thus interest acts as a Taxshield.

c. Return on Equity is a vey important parameter for shareholers. Return on equity means how much a firm is generating profits from its Shareholder's investment in the firm. It is a Profitability measurement ratio. Lets try to understand this by the following example:

Particulars Rs. Particulars Rs.
Total Net Income 2000 Total Net Income 2000
Equity 1000 Equity 500
Debt 0 Debt 500
Return on Equity 2000/1000= 200 % Net income after Payment of Debt 2000-500= 1500
Return on Equity 1500/500= 300%

First Case: The firm has no debt. So the entire capital has been rasied from equity (Rs. 1000). Therefore the return on equity is 200%

Second Case: The firm has issued Equity of Rs.500 and debt of Rs.500. Therefore, Return on Equity is 300%

Therefore, in the second case the firm is performing well in compare to the first case.


Related Solutions

1. Why do firms issue debt instead of only issuing equity? 2. Why do firms focus...
1. Why do firms issue debt instead of only issuing equity? 2. Why do firms focus on capital structure? 3. What do you think of a high profit firm like Microsoft with over 200 billion of cash and marketable securities on its balance sheet, would issue debt?
Explain why a startup might choose to issue equity instead of debt. Describe the nature of...
Explain why a startup might choose to issue equity instead of debt. Describe the nature of the equity. [Hint: When you supply financing (debt or equity) to a firm, what make it pay you back?]
Question: Why would a company choose to issue bonds instead of issuing stock?
  Question: Why would a company choose to issue bonds instead of issuing stock?
Why do firms have different debt to equity ratios across industries? What is one of the...
Why do firms have different debt to equity ratios across industries? What is one of the factors, which determines a firm’s target debt-equity ratio? (Please provide figures for a specific industry benchmark along with some key players in that market) 400-500
1. After big stock price run ups, debt ratio falls, but firms tend to issue equity...
1. After big stock price run ups, debt ratio falls, but firms tend to issue equity instead of debt. This observation is not consistent with the trade-off theory of capital structure. True False 2. A conservative current asset investment policy implies that relatively large amounts of cash and inventories are carried, and sales are stimulated by the use of credit policy that provides liberal financing to customers and a corresponding high level of accounts receivable. True False 3. In the...
Why would a company fund its operations by issuing equity rather than debt?
Why would a company fund its operations by issuing equity rather than debt?
Explain the long-term underperformance of firms issuing equity
Explain the long-term underperformance of firms issuing equity
By Definition, the pecking order Theory states that firms prefer to issue debt rather than equity...
By Definition, the pecking order Theory states that firms prefer to issue debt rather than equity if internal finance is insufficient, e.g. due to assymetric information and related (mis)Interpretation by Investors. What does "assymetric Information and Investor misinterpretation actually mean in this context?" I would be very greatful for a thoroughly explained answer.
Why are firms likely to prefer INTERNALLY generated equity to issuing new shares of common? Identify...
Why are firms likely to prefer INTERNALLY generated equity to issuing new shares of common? Identify and briefly explain two reasons.
Management tends to focus on residual risk instead of inherent risk. Why do you think this...
Management tends to focus on residual risk instead of inherent risk. Why do you think this is so? Why should internal auditors consider both inherent risk and residual risk when planning an assurance engagement?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT