Question

In: Accounting

On January 1, 2005, Technocraft, Inc., acquired a patent that was used for manufacturing semiconductor-based electronic...

On January 1, 2005, Technocraft, Inc., acquired a patent that was used for manufacturing semiconductor-based electronic circuitry. The patent was originally recorded in Technocraft's ledger at its cost of $1,779,000. Technocraft has been amortizing the patent over an expected economic life of 10 years. Residual value was assumed to be zero. Technocraft sued another company for infringing on its patent. On January 1, 2012, Technocraft spent $180,000 on this suit and won a judgment to recover the $180,000 plus damages of $500,000. The sued company paid the $680,000. 1.Prepare the journal entry to record the award of $680,000 on January 1, 2012. 2. Indicate the entry you would have made had Technocraft lost the suit. (Assume that the patent would be valueless if Technocraft had lost the suit.) 3.What are the financial statement effects of capitalizing or expensing the cost of defending the patent? 4.Prepare the necessary journal entry on December 31, 2011. 5.Prepare the necessary journal entry on January 1, 2012, to record the expenditure of $180,000 to defend the patent.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution :

Desciption of Patents and concpets : ( some of the answers can be derived from the explanation)

Patent is a right conferred upon application to and approval by the federal government for the exclusive use of an invention.Patents may be purchased or developed internally The initial capitalised cost of a purchased patent is normally the fair value of the consideration given.

Subsequent to the grant of a patent, the owner need to defends a suit for patent infridgement..

The unrecovered costs of successful litigation are capitalized because they will benefit future periods. The costs of unsuccessful litigation are expensed out. it also indicates that the unamortized cost of the patent has no value and should be recognised as a loss.

1. Cash/Bank A/c .... Dr 680,000 ( reciept of money)

To Litigation (legal) Expenses 180,000 ( recovery of expenses already paid for )

To Revenue A/c 500,000 ( being damage claim recieved and recognised as revenue to be transferred to profit and loss)

2. If the patent would be valueless, the litigation expenses would be need to be expensed off. Also the balance amount on the patents account need to be written off since the value of the asset is now zero.

Book value of the patent as on 12/31/2011 = 1779000 * 3/10 = 533,400 ( from 2005 to 2011 for each of the years 177900 was expensed off).

Profit & Loss A/c .... dr 713,400 ( 533,400 + 180,000)

To Litigation expense 180,000 ( being expense transferred as loss)

To Patents ( Being assets written off)

3 & 4. If the defence was successful, the cost should be capitalised and written off over the remianing life of the patent. Patent A/c ..... Dr 180,000 To Litigation Expenses 180,000

If the defence was unsuccesful, the cost of defence along with the patent should be written off. refer journal entry1.

Altthough the judgement of the lawsuit was on 1st January ( assuming December is the year end ) , this event is subsequent item and the transaction needs to be recorded.


Related Solutions

Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $41,300 cash. The patent was estimated...
Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $41,300 cash. The patent was estimated to have a useful life of 10 years with no residual value. On December 31, 2018, before any adjustments were recorded for the year, management determined that the remaining useful life was 7 years (with that new estimate being effective as of January 1, 2018). On June 30, 2019, the patent was sold for $26,300. Required: Prepare the journal entry to record the acquisition...
Kingston, Inc., acquired a patent on January 1, 2016 for $40,000 cash. The patent was estimated...
Kingston, Inc., acquired a patent on January 1, 2016 for $40,000 cash. The patent was estimated to have a useful life of 10 years with no residual value, and the firm decided to use straight-line amortization. On January 1, 2017, management determined that the remaining useful life was actually only 6 years. On June 30, 2018, the patent was sold for $25,000. 1.Show the journal entry to record the acquisition of the patent on January 1, 2016 (3 points). 2....
Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $40,900 cash. The patent was estimated...
Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $40,900 cash. The patent was estimated to have a useful life of 10 years with no residual value. On December 31, 2018, before any adjustments were recorded for the year, management determined that the remaining useful life was 7 years (with that new estimate being effective as of January 1, 2018). On June 30, 2019, the patent was sold for $25,900. Required: Prepare the journal entry to record the acquisition...
Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $40,500 cash. The patent was estimated...
Martinez, Inc. acquired a patent on January 1, 2017 for $40,500 cash. The patent was estimated to have a useful life of 10 years with no residual value. On December 31, 2018, before any adjustments were recorded for the year, management determined that the remaining useful life was 7 years (with that new estimate being effective as of January 1, 2018). On June 30, 2019, the patent was sold for $25,500. Required: Prepare the journal entry to record the acquisition...
On January 1, 2020 (the first day of its fiscal year) Vaughn Ltd. acquired a patent...
On January 1, 2020 (the first day of its fiscal year) Vaughn Ltd. acquired a patent which gave the company the right to use a production process. The process met the six criteria for capitalization as an intangible asset. Below is a listing of the events relating to the patent over the five fiscal years from 2020 through 2024: 2020: ● on January 1, acquired the patent for the production process from its inventory for a cash payment of $12,800,000,...
On January 1, 2020 (the first day of its fiscal year) Wildhorse Ltd. acquired a patent...
On January 1, 2020 (the first day of its fiscal year) Wildhorse Ltd. acquired a patent which gave the company the right to use a production process. The process met the six criteria for capitalization as an intangible asset. Below is a listing of the events relating to the patent over the five fiscal years from 2020 through 2024: 2020: ● on January 1, acquired the patent for the production process from its inventory for a cash payment of $17,400,000,...
On January 1, 2011, John Doe Enterprises (JDE) acquired a 55% interest in Bubba Manufacturing, Inc....
On January 1, 2011, John Doe Enterprises (JDE) acquired a 55% interest in Bubba Manufacturing, Inc. (BMI). JDE paid for the transaction with $3 million cash and 500,000 shares of JDE common stock (par value $1.00 per share). At the time of acquisition, BMI's book value was $16,970,000. On January 1, JDE stock had a market value of $14.90 per share and there was no control premium in this transaction. Any consideration transferred over book valu is assigned to goodwill....
Granite Enterprises acquired a patent from Southern Research Corporation on January 1, 2021, for $4.6 million....
Granite Enterprises acquired a patent from Southern Research Corporation on January 1, 2021, for $4.6 million. The patent will be used for five years, even though its legal life is 20 years. Rocky Corporation has made a commitment to purchase the patent from Granite for $110,000 at the end of five years. Compute Granite's patent amortization for 2021, assuming the straight-line method is used. Multiple Choice $920,000. $460,000. $449,000. $898,000.
On January 1, 2016, Parker, Inc., a U.S.-based firm, acquired 100 percent of Suffolk PLC located...
On January 1, 2016, Parker, Inc., a U.S.-based firm, acquired 100 percent of Suffolk PLC located in Great Britain for consideration paid of 52,000,000 British pounds (£), which was equal to fair value. The excess of fair value over book value is attributable to land (part of property, plant, and equipment) and is not subject to depreciation. Parker accounts for its investment in Suffolk at cost. On January 1, 2016, Suffolk reported the following balance sheet: Cash $ 2,000,000 Accounts...
On January 1, 2016, Parker, Inc., a U.S.-based firm, acquired 100 percent of Suffolk PLC located...
On January 1, 2016, Parker, Inc., a U.S.-based firm, acquired 100 percent of Suffolk PLC located in Great Britain for consideration paid of 52,000,000 British pounds (£), which was equal to fair value. The excess of fair value over book value is attributable to land (part of property, plant, and equipment) and is not subject to depreciation. Parker accounts for its investment in Suffolk at cost. On January 1, 2016, Suffolk reported the following balance sheet: Cash $ 2,000,000 Accounts...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT