Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Interpret the following results: 1. Dr. Horton conducted a study and reported: p = .001, d...

Interpret the following results:

1. Dr. Horton conducted a study and reported: p = .001, d = .40. Dr. Theimer conducted a similar study and reported: p =.04, d = .40. Who had the larger effect and what is the most likely reason they had different p-values?

2. Dr. Lane reported that following a study on the effects of a new drug on obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), that the F for the drug was p = .03. Dr. Lane concluded that the new drug showed promise in reducing the symptoms of OCD. Was Dr. Lane justified in saying this, and why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

In the testing of hypothesis alternative hypothesis shows the what is study interest of the researcher.

Decision Rule:

The p-value is the probability of what is the chances of null hypothesis would be true.

i.e. the higher the p-value then higher the chances of accepting the null hypothesis.

If p-value greater than the level of significance then we accept the null hypothesis.

level of significance value is on your choice how many errors in result you accept.

in most of the study 5% or 1% level of significance used.

Qus:1

Dr. Horton and Dr. Theimer conducted the similar study.

but Dr.Horton get the good results than Dr.Theimer

because the p-value is less than Theimer i.e. chances of rejecting the null hypothesis is increases in Dr.Hortan's test.

So Dr.Horton create good results.

Results are different because the doing same study but uses different samples for this and different instruments so accuracy is changed as sample changed then p-value also changed.

Qus:2

Testing of Hypothesis:

H0: The effects of a new drug on the obsessive-compulsive disorder do not effective.

against,

H1: The effects of a new drug on the obsessive-compulsive disorder is effective.

Decision Rule:

If p-value greater than the level of significance then we accept the null hypothesis.

If Dr. Lane consider the level of significance 5% then,

p-value 0.03 < 0.05 (level of significance)

i.e. we reject null hypothesis H0.

i.e. The effects of a new drug on the obsessive-compulsive disorder is effective.

So, Dr. Lane justified this new drug is useful.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Luck >>>>>>>>>>>>


Related Solutions

1. Interpret the results of the studies below. a) A study was run to estimate the...
1. Interpret the results of the studies below. a) A study was run to estimate the difference between UC students and CSU students in the proportion that work full-time. A random sample of 200 UC students had 42 that worked full-time. A random sample of 300 CSU students had 96 that worked full-time. Researchers found a 95% confidence interval of -0.187<PUC-PCSU<-0.033. b) A study was run to determine if a new machine at a factory was less likely to produce...
1.Interpret the following results of multiple regression. Interpret each statistic (b and beta) for each independent...
1.Interpret the following results of multiple regression. Interpret each statistic (b and beta) for each independent variable and the intercept. Provide a complete interpretation using the five-step model of hypothesis testing. Regression: The Relationship Between Number of Math Courses Taken, High School Grade Point Average, College Grade Point Average and Score on Stat Final                Variables Entered/Removed(b) Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method 1 Number of Math Courses taken, High School Grade Point Average, College Grade Point Average(a) . Enter...
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the...
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the occurrence of sodium and chloride on the surface of water currents in Rhode Island. The following data presents the concentration of chloride designated ? (in milligrams per liter) and the taxiway area in the basin as ? (in percentage). ? 4.4 6.6 9.7 10.6 10.8 10.9 ? 0.19 0.15 0.57 0.70 0.67 0.63 ? 11.8 12.1 14.3 14.7 15.0 17.3 ? 0.47 0.70 0.60...
What is wrong with relying on P values to interpret findings in a study.
What is wrong with relying on P values to interpret findings in a study.
1.Interpret the following results of analysis of variance. Interpret each statistic including post-hoc comparisons. Provide a...
1.Interpret the following results of analysis of variance. Interpret each statistic including post-hoc comparisons. Provide a complete interpretation using the five-step model of hypothesis testing. Oneway: Relationship Between Lab Section and Score on Stat Final                                                                                Descriptives Score on Stat Final N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum Lower Bound Upper Bound 1 22 40.68 13.892 2.962 34.52 46.84 14 65 2 22 32.59 12.015 2.562 27.26 37.92 7 55 3 24 29.83 12.910...
1 point) A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported the results...
1 point) A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported the results of an experiment where 40 overweight individuals followed the Weight Watchers diet for one year. Their weight changes at the end of the year had a mean of ?¯=3.1x¯=3.1 kg with a standard deviation of ?=4.7s=4.7 kg. We want to use this data to test the claim that the diet has an effect, that is, that the weight change is higher than 0. 1....
1 point) A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported the results...
1 point) A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported the results of an experiment where 40 overweight individuals followed the Weight Watchers diet for one year. Their weight changes at the end of the year had a mean of x¯=3.1x¯=3.1 kg with a standard deviation of s=5.1s=5.1 kg. We want to use this data to test the claim that the diet has an effect, that is, that the weight change is higher than 0. 1....
In a study conducted of proctored and non- proctored algebra tests, researches obtained the following results:...
In a study conducted of proctored and non- proctored algebra tests, researches obtained the following results: Proctored: n=30, x=74.30, s= 12.87 Non Proctored: n=32, x= 74.26, s= 18.15 Use 0.01 to test the claim that students taking non proctored tests get a higher mean that those taking proctored tests.
1. Use the following table to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).             and Interpret the results...
1. Use the following table to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).             and Interpret the results in words. Credibility X Persuasion Y 59 64 54 60 59 63 58 72 71 78 55 69 55 69 54 67 2.Explain Type I error
1. STATISTICAL RESULTS: Report and statistically interpret the results with an appropriate tabular format and text....
1. STATISTICAL RESULTS: Report and statistically interpret the results with an appropriate tabular format and text. See the Output B. [6 pt] 2. DISCUSSION: Discuss what the results imply. [2 pt] Output A. Descriptive statistics Statistics Exam Performance (%) Exam Anxiety N Valid 103 103 Missing 0 0 Mean 56.57 74.3437 Median 60.00 79.0440 Std. Deviation 25.941 17.18186 Minimum 2 1.00 Maximum 100 100.00 Output B. Simple Linear Regression Results Correlations Exam Performance (%) Exam Anxiety Pearson Correlation Exam Performance...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT