The elements of fraud triangle are
opportunity, motivation, and rationalization. The elements can be
explained as follows:
- Opportunity: The
employees of a company are given an opportunity when the employees
have access to the assets and information that can enable the
employee to both commit and conceal the fraud. It is impossible to
expect the employee to work without giving access to information
and assets and this situation leads to inherent opportunity for an
employee to commit the fraud.
- Motivation: This
is a complex element of all which can be either financial or
nonfinancial. The pressure felt by an employee is the trigger that
makes the employee commit the fraud. For example, the manager may
inflate the items of financial statements under pressure to provide
better results than earlier.
- Rationalization:
This is rather a psychological factor wherein the employee
rationalizes committing fraud as correct owing to a variety of
reasons say, for example, underpayment of compensation. Usually,
the susceptibility of a person to this element depends upon the
ethical values of the employee. A dishonest person can rationalize
his acts of committing fraud while an honest person cannot do
so.
By adopting strong internal controls
and processes, any company may reduce the risk of the impact of the
fraud triangle on the employee of the company. The internal control
elements can reduce the chances of opportunity to the employees in
particular. Proper placement of internal controls will expose the
existing flaws to the management at earlier point of time thereby
enabling the company and its management to be proactive in
identifying such vulnerabilities and fix them as soon as
possible.
The two most important internal
control activities for preventing and controlling the fraud
triangle are as follows:
- Implementation and encouragement of
whistleblowing: Whistle blowing is a medium through which source
(whether internal or external) can confidentially report the
happening of a fraud which comes to their knowledge;
- Proper segregation of duties: The
segregation of duties should be in such a way that no single person
should be given access to both the custody of assets as well as
authorization to record transactions pertaining to such asset in
books of accounts. This will prevent an employee from both
committing and concealing a fraud in isolation to others thereby
killing their opportunity.