Question

In: Accounting

COLORADO CORPORATION On October 27, 2011, a freak snowstorm destroyed the work-in-process of the company, who...

COLORADO CORPORATION

On October 27, 2011, a freak snowstorm destroyed the work-in-process of the company, who promptly filed a claim with their insurance company for the lost work-in-process inventory, and raw materials inventory which were in the factory. Luckily, the finished goods are kept at a separate warehouse location, which was not damaged by the storm. As is normal, they put in a claim for lost profits as a result of the damage.

You have been sent to the scene on behalf of the insurance company to audit the claim being made by company. The company claims that the cost of work-in-process inventory destroyed by the storm was $50,000, and the cost of raw materials was $175,000.

From your conversations with factory personnel, you discover that the company was in process of manufacturing two custom jobs, Alpha and Gamma, both of which were started during 2011. Further discussion with the warehouse supervisor revealed that there was one job, Beta, complete and in the warehouse awaiting shipment at the time of the storm.

While the company’s onsite accounting records were destroyed, you were able to get the following information from off-site backup records, and through interviewing company personnel:

  1. The company applies overhead at the rate of 85% of direct labor cost.
  2. Cost of goods sold averages 75% of the company’s selling price.
  3. Sales to date as of the date of the storm totaled $1,598,000.
  4. The company pays its factory workers a rate of $12.90 per hour. A total of 25,760 direct labor hours were used during the year.
  5. Raw materials purchased year to date totaled $843,276.
  6. Total costs of job Beta amounted to $165,600.

Job cost records for Alpha and Gamma showed the following:

Alpha

Gamma

Direct materials

$ 21,980

$ 14,700

Direct labor

128 hrs

240 hrs

The December 31, 2010 financial statements showed the following inventory amounts:

Raw materials

$ 19,500

Finished goods

$ 68,900

Work in process

$ 14,600

Required:

  1. Calculate the cost of goods sold for the year.
  2. Calculate the cost of goods manufactured for the year.
  3. Compute the amount of applied overhead for each job in the WIP inventory (round to the nearest dollar).
  4. Evaluate the claim for damages submitted as follows:
  1. Determine the cost of work in process destroyed by the snowstorm.
  2. Determine the cost of raw materials destroyed by the snowstorm.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1.Cost of goods sold for the year is:-

Particular Amount
Sales 1598000
COGS% 75%
COGS Value 1198500

2.Cost of goods manufactured for the year is:-

Particular Amount
Closing finished goods 165600
Cost of goods sold 1198500
Less: Opening finished goods 68900
Cost of goods Manufactured 1295200

3.Amount of applied overhead for each job in the WIP inventory:-

Particular Hrs Rate Overhead rate Overhead applied
Alpha 128 12.9 85% $          1,403.52
Gamma 240 12.9 85% $          2,631.60

4.Cost of work in process destroyed by the snowstorm is:-

Particular Alpha Gamma
Direct Material $   21,980.00 $   14,700.00
Direct Labour $      1,651.20 $     3,096.00
(128*12.9) (240*12.9)
Overheads $      1,403.52 $     2,631.60
Total cost/ Destroyed value $   25,034.72 $   20,427.60

5.Cost of raw materials destroyed by the snowstorm is:-

Particular Amount
Opening Raw material $         19,500.00
Add: Purchases $       843,276.00
Less: Raw material used(Note1&2) $       711,299.92
Destroyed Raw material $       151,476.08

Note 1:-

Particular Amount
Cost of goods manufactured 1295200
Closing WIP 45462.32
Less: Opening WIP 14600
Total manufacturing cost 1326062.32

Note 2:-

Particular Amount
Total manufacturing cost 1326062.32
Less: DL 332304
Less: Overheads 282458.4
Ram material used 711299.92

Related Solutions

Work-in-process inventory, January 1, 2011 $ 51,000 Work-in-process inventory, December 31, 2011 $ 56,500 Conversion costs...
Work-in-process inventory, January 1, 2011 $ 51,000 Work-in-process inventory, December 31, 2011 $ 56,500 Conversion costs during the year $ 423,000 1. If direct materials used during the year were $143,000, what was cost of goods manufactured? 2. If the cost of goods manufactured for the year was $575,000, what was the amount of direct materials used during the year?
ABC Corporation owned a business warehouse that was destroyed by fire on October 1, 2020. On...
ABC Corporation owned a business warehouse that was destroyed by fire on October 1, 2020. On December 1, 2020 the corporation received an insurance payment of $900,000 for the loss. The corporation’s basis in the warehouse just prior to the loss was $500,000. The corporation would like to use the involuntary conversion rules to defer as much gain as possible. Assume the corporation built a new warehouse on the old site within the required timeframe and incurred construction costs of...
1. ABC Corporation owned a business warehouse that was destroyed by fire on October 1, 2020....
1. ABC Corporation owned a business warehouse that was destroyed by fire on October 1, 2020. On December 1, 2020 the corporation received an insurance payment of $900,000 for the loss. The corporation’s basis in the warehouse just prior to the loss was $500,000. The corporation would like to use the involuntary conversion rules to defer as much gain as possible. Assume the corporation built a new warehouse on the old site within the required timeframe and incurred construction costs...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 230,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $119,600 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.48 $ 0.52 December 31, 2017 0.51 0.54 January 31, 2018 0.53 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 130,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $54,600 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.38 $ 0.42 December 31, 2017 0.41 0.44 January 31, 2018 0.43 N/A harp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 310,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $186,000 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Foward Rate (to January 31, 2018) 10/1/2017 0.56 0.6 12/31/17 0.59 0.62 01/31/2018 0.61 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an annual interest rate of 12 percent (1 percent...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 310,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $186,000 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.56 $ 0.60 December 31, 2017 0.59 0.62 January 31, 2018 0.61 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 340,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $122,400 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.32 $ 0.36 December 31, 2017 0.35 0.38 January 31, 2018 0.37 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 100,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $39,000 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.35 $ 0.39 December 31, 2017 0.38 0.41 January 31, 2018 0.40 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to...
On October 1, 2017, Sharp Company (based in Denver, Colorado) entered into a forward contract to sell 200,000 rubles in four months (on January 31, 2018) and receive $98,000 in U.S. dollars. Exchange rates for the ruble follow: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to January 31, 2018) October 1, 2017 $ 0.45 $ 0.49 December 31, 2017 0.48 0.51 January 31, 2018 0.50 N/A Sharp's incremental borrowing rate is 12 percent. The present value factor for one month at an...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT