In: Economics
Solution: The New classical economists build
their macroeconomic theories on the assumption that wages and
prices are flexible. They believe that prices “clear”
markets—balance supply and demand—by adjusting quickly. New
Keynesian economists, however, believe that market-clearing models
cannot explain short-run economic fluctuations, and
so they advocate models with “sticky” wages and prices.
The new classical model expalanation of business
cycles
The new classical macroeconomics argues that business cycles occur
in reaction to specific shocks, including, inter alia, technology
shocks and fiscal shock, basically within a traditional market
clearing framework.
However, the new classical macroeconomics argues that the monetary
shock predicted has no real impact on the actual variables. We also
remember that wages and rates are perfectly flexible, ensuring two
classic outcomes, that is to say, instant full employment and
long-term money neutrality.
Many macroeconomists accept that monetary policy will affect
unemployment and production, at least in the short term, the new
classical economy developed by Robert Lucas, Thomas Sargent and
Robert Barro emphasizes the role of flexible wages and prices, but
introduces a new element, called rational expectations, to explain
short-term economic volatility or the emergence of market
cycles.
New classical macroeconomics holds that I wages and prices are
flexible, and (ii) people use all available information in order to
make decisions on the basis of which they shape their expectations.
The government can't 'fool' the people under the theory, as people
are well educated and have access to the same information as
government.
The forecasts are objective according to rational expectations and
are based on all available information. That means people are
making impartial forecasts. The central premise in new classical
macroeconomics is that the government can not manipulate people
with systemic economic policies because of reasonable
expectations.
The theory of rational expectations is focused on three
hypotheses:
Imagine the central bank planning to increase the rate of growth in
the money supply to stimulate demand and raise employment. The
expansionary strategy would be expected according to the principle
of rational expectations if the public expects the central bank to
allow open market operations in order to minimize unemployment as
they have seen it done in the past.
As expectations are realistic, employees and businesses agree
that an expansionary strategy would move the AD curve from AD1 to
AD2 to the right and expect the aggregate price level to rise to
P2. Workers should demand higher wages, so that as the price level
increases, their actual earnings remain the same. So there is no
extra labour, and no extra production is made.
The AS curve then moves left to AS2 and intersects with AD2 at
point 2, a point of equilibrium where aggregate production is at
the natural rate level Yn and the price level is increasing to
P2.
The new keynesian model explanation of business model
New classical economists build their macroeconomic theories on
the assumption that wages and prices are flexible. They believe
that prices “clear” markets—balance
supply and demand—by adjusting quickly. New Keynesian economists,
however, believe that market-clearing models cannot explain
short-run economic fluctuations, and
so they advocate models with “sticky” wages and prices.
The new classical model in business cycles
The new classical macroeconomics argues that business cycles occur
in reaction to specific shocks, including, inter alia, technology
shocks and fiscal shock, basically within a traditional market
clearing framework.
However, the new classical macroeconomics argues that the monetary
shock predicted has no real impact on the actual variables. We also
remember that wages and rates are perfectly flexible, ensuring two
classic outcomes, that is to say, instant full employment and
long-term money neutrality.
Many macroeconomists accept that monetary policy will affect
unemployment and production, at least in the short term, the new
classical economy developed by Robert Lucas, Thomas Sargent and
Robert Barro emphasizes the role of flexible wages and prices, but
introduces a new element, called rational expectations, to explain
short-term economic volatility or the emergence of market
cycles.
New classical macroeconomics holds that I wages and prices are
flexible, and (ii) people use all available information in order to
make decisions on the basis of which they shape their expectations.
The government can't 'fool' the people under the theory, as people
are well educated and have access to the same information as
government.
The forecasts are objective according to rational expectations and
are based on all available information. That means people are
making impartial forecasts. The central premise in new classical
macroeconomics is that the government can not manipulate people
with systemic economic policies because of reasonable
expectations.
The theory of rational expectations is focused on three hypotheses:
I individuals and business firms learn from experience to predict
the effects of monetary and fiscal policy changes; (ii) act
immediately to preserve their economic interests; (iii) Both
resource and commodity markets are strictly competitive; That means
all markets are automatically open, even in the absence of
government intervention
Imagine the central bank planning to increase the rate of growth in
the money supply to stimulate demand and raise employment. The
expansionary strategy would be expected according to the principle
of rational expectations if the public expects the central bank to
allow open market operations in order to minimize unemployment as
they have seen it done in the past.
As expectations are realistic, employees and businesses agree
that an expansionary strategy would move the AD curve from AD1 to
AD2 to the right and expect the aggregate price level to rise to
P2. Workers should demand higher wages, so that as the price level
increases, their actual earnings remain the same. So there is no
extra labour, and no extra production is made.
The AS curve then moves left to AS2 and intersects with AD2 at
point 2, a point of equilibrium where aggregate production is at
the natural rate level Yn and the price level is increasing to
P2.
The new Keynesian theories give different reasons for stickiness in
wage prices. Other theories include the principle of productivity
compensation, low menu costs and aggregate externality of
production, and phased price change, among others.
Short-run fluctuations in production and employment are variations
from the natural unemployment rate of the economy — the rate that
is compatible with absolute price stability. Deviations from the
natural rate occur because of the slow adjustment of wages and
prices to rising macroeconomic climate.
This inflexibility (stickiness) is what makes the short run AS
curve sloping upwards rather than downwards. Consequently the
economy is experiencing volatility in short-run production and
employment.
In Keynesian models unemployment is caused by restrictive money
wage due to fixed-wage labor contracts and backward-looking price
expectations of the workers. As overall product demand decreases,
labour-demand also declines. But due to the rigidity of the money
wage it is not possible to keep the initial level of employment in
the short run.
There are three sources of price and wage
rigidities:
1. Imperfection of the product market, that is the nature of unfair competition and oligopoly;
2. Rigidity of quality of the product; and
3. External rigidities — variables that make the actual wage or
relative price of a product rigid when dealing with shifts in
aggregate demand.
The Southwest quadrant shows a job market. The only deviation from
the current classical model is that businesses are imperfectly
efficient, such that the marginal labor function product (MPL) is
followed by a marginal labor schedule revenue product (MRPL).
Companies select a standard of jobs where the MRPL exceeds the real
salary (w / p). The quadrant to the southeast
Shows a typical concave manufacturing mechanism connecting jobs and
production. The principle of evaluating jobs and production is
similar to that of the modern classical model.Households and
businesses determine how much labor to trade and generate on the
basis of real wage anticipations and understanding that real wages
are set in monopolistically competitive conditions. This
establishes the real wage and natural level of jobs (N *) and
production (y *) of the long-term equilibrium.
The quadrant in the northeast indicates the commodities sector that
has a regular AD plan. The AD schedule embodies the interest-rate
law of the monetary authority. Unless the monetary authority has a
fixed nominal interest rate goal, the nominal interest rate shall
remain unchanged over the duration of the AD schedule. If it has a
reaction "leaning against the wind," the nominal interest rate
rises as
the economy moves down the AD schedule.This also means that in such
a system the AD timetable is steeper. There is also a marginal
revenue (MR) and marginal costs (MC) schedule, in addition to the
AD schedule. Because of the decision on output and work exchange
and implied real wages, firms set a price level such that demand
expected is equal to production (y *) at which point MR is equal to
MC.
Finally, firms are bound by fixed prices for the remainder of the
time interval of price change, having set costs. That generates a
horizontal short run 28 aggregate supply schedule (SRAS) whereby
firms meet all demand for the duration of the price period at the
fixed price.