Supply side economics advocates that production is the prime
driver of economic growth. It focusses on policies to augment
production of the economy. It also advocates that tax cuts can
induce the people to save and invest more ion the economy. It
largely calls for a free market with very little govt intervention
which is opposite to Keynesian economics focusing on demand-side of
economy.
Why Supply side economics has not reduced income inequality
?
- THE FAULTY TRICKLE DOWN THEORY - The supply
side economics rests on an important pillar i.e Trickle down
effect. It assumed that the corporate tax cuts to big corporates
would leave them with more income which they will save and invest
back to the economy. This will create a trickle down effect and the
benefit will be passed on to lower sections of society. However,
this has not been true as the corporates keep on building their own
wealth and their needs become insatiatble , further lowering
trickle down effect. Hence, rich become more richer and poor more
poorer.
- WRONG USE OF FISCAL POLICY- Supply side
economics largely advocates a fiscal policy with the tool of tax
cut to higher brackets ignoring other tools such as govt spending
(as it assumes very low govt intervention in market) . This caters
only for the supply side/production activities and leaving the
demand side unadressed. Putting more money into the hands of
consumer would automatically increase production due to more demand
but this aspect is ignored here . Therefore, it creates income
inequalities by only catering to the income of sellers and not the
buyers.