Question

In: Economics

Exercise 2. Two plants A firm has two plants, both with increasing marginal costs. Plant 1...

Exercise 2. Two plants

A firm has two plants, both with increasing marginal costs. Plant 1 is more efficient than plant 2. Specifically, the cost function in plant 1 is c1(y1)=2y12, while the cost function in plant 2 is c2(y2)=3y22. Output produced in plant 1, y1, is identical to output produced in plant 2, y2. For any overall output level Y=y1+y2the firm wants to minimize costs.

  1. What is the marginal cost in plant 1? Find ∂c1/∂y1.

  1. What is the marginal cost in plant 2? Find ∂c2/∂y2.

  1. The firm needs to produce a total of Y=10 units. If it decides to produce all of them in plant 1 (y1=100 and y2=0), what is the total cost?

  1. What is the optimal production level, y1*and y2*, that would minimize cost? What is the total cost now?

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. Total Cost of plani 1, c1(y1) = 2y12

Marginal cost in plant 1, MC1 = ∂c1/∂y1 = ∂(2y12)/∂y1 = 4y1

b. Total Cost of plani 2, c2(y2) = 3y22

Marginal cost in plant 2, MC2 = ∂c2/∂y2 = ∂(3y22)/∂y2 = 6y2

c. if it produces all of output in firm 1 and total output is Y = y1 = 10

(In the question, it is mentioned that y1=100 and y2=0, but as Y = y1+y2 = 10, then  y1 cannot be greater than 10. So, I have considered y1 = 10 in this case)

Then, the total cost of production is, c1(y1) = 2y12 = 2 * (10)2 = 2 * 100 = 200

d. Optimal production condition in 2 plant model for cost minimization is,

MC1 = MC2

or, 4y1 = 6y2

or, y1 = (3/2)y2

Now,  y1 + y2 = 10

or, (3/2)y2 + y2 = 10

or, (5/2)y2 = 10

or, y2* = 4

y1* = (3/2)y2* = (3/2)*4 = 6

Optimal production level for cost minimization is, y1* = 6 and y2* = 4

Total Cost of plant 1, c1(y1) = 2y12 = 2*62 = 2*36 = 72 unit

Total Cost of plant 2, c2(y2) = 3y22 = 3*42 = 3*16 = 48 unit

So, total cost is, TC(Y) = c1(y1) + c2(y2) = 72 + 48 = 120 unit


Related Solutions

Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution, or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution, or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
If two goods are perfect substitutes, both goods are produced with increasing marginal cost, and for...
If two goods are perfect substitutes, both goods are produced with increasing marginal cost, and for some reason the marginal cost of producing one of the two goods go up, but the marginal cost of producing the other good stay the same, what is the effect on the equilibrium prices of the two goods? Explain your answer carefully.
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA =...
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA = 4AA and MCB = AB, where AA and AB are the tons of emissions abated by firm A and B, respectively. a. Calculate the total cost if each firm is required to abate 50 tons of emissions. b. Would this policy be cost effective and why? c. What if the government set the total abatement to be 100 tons with tradable allowances, what is...
1) A book manufacturing company has two different production plants, plant A and plant B. 40%...
1) A book manufacturing company has two different production plants, plant A and plant B. 40% of books come from plant A. Of the books that come from plant A 30% are defective and 70% work as intended. Of the books from plant B 10% are defective and 90% work as intended. On top of this 10% of the defective books from plant A explode. A) Draw a tree diagram of this data. B) What is the probability of randomly...
1. You are given a firm under perfect competition. The firm has two plants. It is...
1. You are given a firm under perfect competition. The firm has two plants. It is faced with the problem of allocating a given total output between the two plants that it owns. (a) How should the firm allocate its total output among the two plants. (b) Graphically illustrate the allocation.
Assume that there are two electric power plants (firm 1 and firm 2) emitting sulfur dioxide,...
Assume that there are two electric power plants (firm 1 and firm 2) emitting sulfur dioxide, an air pollutant. They can reduce emissions at the following total costs, where q1 is tons of emissions abatement by firm 1, and q2 is tons of abatement by firm 2: TC1=6q1^2 TC2=2q2^2 Assume that unregulated emissions are 40 tons for each firm, for a total of 80 tons. a. An environmental regulator must reduce the total emissions of sulfur dioxide by 20 tons....
Scenario 2: A firm is considering which of two devices to install to reduce costs. Both...
Scenario 2: A firm is considering which of two devices to install to reduce costs. Both devices have a useful live of 5 years and zero salvage value. The firm has a MARR of 12% per year and a reinvestment rate of 10% per year. Device A costs $10,000 dollars and is expected to save $3,000 annually. Device B costs $13,500 and will provide cost savings of $3,000 the first year, $3,500 the second year, $4,000 the third year, $4,500...
Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal...
Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 1 12 6 0 10 4 0 20 8 1. What are the total abatement costs for the firms and economy to reduce 50% of the emissions with command and control policies? 2. How will cap and trade improve the situation,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT