In: Economics
Assume both Atlantis and Zanadu produce helmets and baseballs.
Using equal amounts of resources, Atlantis can produce 100 helmets
or 200 baseballs, whereas Zanadu can produce 100 helmets or 400
baseballs.
(a) Assume both Atlantis and Zanadu experience constant opportunity
costs in producing helmets and baseballs. Draw a correctly labeled
graph illustrating the production possibilities curves (PPCs) for
Atlantis and Zanadu, showing helmets on the horizontal axis and
baseballs on the vertical axis. Plot the numerical values provided
above on your graph.
(b) Calculate the opportunity cost of one helmet for Atlantis. Show
your work.
(c) Which country has an absolute advantage in the production of
baseballs?
(d) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of
baseballs? Explain.
(e) If Atlantis and Zanadu specialize based on comparative
advantage and trade, would they be able to gain from trade if the
terms of trade are 1 helmet for 3 baseballs? Explain.
b) Atlantis can produce 100 helmets or 200 baseballs
The opportunity cost of producing 1 helmet for Atlantis = 200/100 = 2 baseballs
c) Zanadu can produce a higher number of baseballs using the same resources. Therefore, Zanadu has an absolute advantage in the production of baseballs
d) The opportunity cost of producing 1 baseball for Atlantis = 100/200 = 0.5 helmets
The opportunity cost of producing 1 baseball for Zanadu = 100/400 = 0.25 helmets
As the opportunity cost of producing baseballs is lower for Zanadu, Zanadu has a comparative advantage in the production of baseballs.
e) Terms of trade = 1 helmet for 3 baseballs.
The opportunity cost of 1 helmet for Atlantis = 2 baseballs
The opportunity cost of 1 helmet for Zanadu = 4 baseballs
As the terms of trade lie between the opportunity costs of the given economies, the terms of trade are beneficial and both the economies gain from trade.