If United Airlines choose the strategy to not advertise,
American Airlines would choose to advertise.
If United Airlines choose the strategy to advertise, American
Airlines would choose to advertise.
So, we can see that American Airline has the dominant strategy
of advertising.
If American Airlines choose the strategy to not advertise,
United Airlines would choose to advertise.
If American Airlines choose the strategy to advertise, United
Airlines would choose not to advertise.
So, we can see that United Airline does not have a dominant
strategy.
So, we can see that only United Airlines has a dominant strategy
and the dominant strategy is to advertise.
We know that American Airlines will choose to advertise,
irrespective of the strategy that united airlines chooses. And when
American Airlines will choose to advertise, United Airlines would
choose not to advertise. So the Nash equilibrium is American
airlines choosing to Advertise and United Airlines not choosing to
advertise.
In Stackelberg Equilibrium, the leader firm chooses the strategy
and the other firms follow te same strategy.
Now, if American Airlines make their advertising decision first,
they will choose to advertise, because they know that United
Airlines will also choose to advertise and in this case, there will
be a profit of 5 for both the firms. So, the Stackelberg
equilibrium would be to advertise for both the firms.
Now, if United Airlines make their advertising decision first,
they will choose to advertise, because they know that American
Airlines will also choose to advertise and in this case, there will
be a profit of 5 for both the firms. So, the Stackelberg
equilibrium would be to advertise for both the firms.
IF YOU FIND THESE ANSWERS HELPFUL, PLEASE UP VOTE.