In: Economics
Suppose New York wants to build a new facility to replace Madison Square Garden. Assume that the cost of building a new arena in midtown Manhattan is $2.5 billion and that all the costs occur right away. Also assume that New York will receive annual benefits of $110 million for the next 25 years, after which the new arena becomes worthless. Does it make financial sense to build the new facility if interest rates are 6 percent? At what interest rate will we be indifferent between accepting and rejecting this project? Make sure to show your work.
Solution
In this question
Initial investment= 2.5 billion
Annual inflow= 110 million= .11 billion
NPV = Sum of present values of all inflows- Initial investment
Sum of present values of inflows can be calculated by considering this as an annuity of .11 billion for 25 years
PV of annuity= Annuity amount*[(1-(1/(1+r)^n)/r]
Here Annuity amount = .11 billion
r=6%
PV = .11*((1-(1/(1.06)^25)/.06)
Solving we get PV= 1.40617
Therefore NPV = 1.40617- 2.5=-1.09383
Since NPV is <0 therefore financially it does not make sense to go ahead with project
Now Interest rate at which we will be indifferent at accepting or rejecting the project where NPV will be 0
Therefore
NPV = Sum of present values of all inflows- Initial investment
Putting NPV= 0
Sum of present values of all inflows= Initial investment
PV of annuity= Initial investment
Annuity amount*[(1-(1/(1+r)^n)/r]=2.5
We have to find r
.11*[1-(1/(1+r)^25))/r=2.5
[1-(1/(1+r)^25))/r=22.727
Solving we get r= .0075
Rate at which we will be indifferent = .75%