In: Economics
Suppose you have to pay $200 for a ticket to enter a
competition. The prize is $1800 and the probability that you win is
1/3. Your current wealth is $1000.
(a) Are you going to enter this competition? Justify
your decision, that is, choose a utility function that best
describes your attitude toward risk, compute your expected
utilities from entering the competition or staying away from it,
and compare them to justify your decision. How does this change if
you have to pay $2 for a ticket to enter a competition. The prize
is $18 and the probability that you win is 1/3. Your current wealth
is $10. comment on your degree of risk aversion
ans) My current wealth = 1000
Now, price of the ticket is 200 and the prize is 1800 with probalilitty 1/3.
Yes, I will enter the competition and the rrason is as follows:
My utility function U(y) = y (y is the amount of money).
Now if I do not enter the competition, I have 1000 with certainity (with probability 1)
Therefore, my utility is U(1000) = 1000
If I enter the competition, If i lose(with probability 2/3), my wealth remains as (1000-200) = 800 and if I win (with probability 1/3), my wealth becomes (1000-200+1800) = 2600.
Therefore, my expected utility is E(U) = 1/3*2600 + 2/3*800 = 4200*3=1400
Since, I get more expected utility from entering the competition, I will take part in the competition.
Now, when price is 2 and the prize is 18,
If I do not eter the competition, E(U) = 1000
If I do not enter the competition, If I lose with probability (2/3), my wealth is 998 and if I win with probability (1/3), my wealth is 1000-2+18 = 1016.
My expected utility = 1/3*1016 + 2/3*998 = 3012/3=1014
Thus, my expected utility is still greater when I enter the competition and I will enter the competition.
I am a risk neutral person. (However, here I choose to enter the competition because the competition does not have the property of fair game with expected loss = expected gain