Question

In: Economics

Should companies be penalized or individuals thrown in jail for raising prices or selling “gouged” supplies?...

Should companies be penalized or individuals thrown in jail for raising prices or selling “gouged” supplies? What, if anything, does this help protect against? Do you think it is a fair punishment? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The arrival of COVID-19, otherwise known as coronavirus, ushered in a predictable boost in prices for essential goods, as well as well-intentioned but ill-advised government attempts to cap what businesses can charge for those items. Such measures certainly leave an impact: eBay, for example, responded to that pressure yesterday, announcing that it would leave the market entirely and pull all coronavirus-related supplies from its virtual stores.

How can a private business owner be subject to crippling fines (or even imprisonment) for setting his or her own prices? Yet that question misses the full point. It fails to address that prices responding to the market—as they tend to do—is a good thing, even in the face of a deadly pandemic.

Accusations of greed hurdled toward price-gouging business owners are understandable, particularly when people are suffering. But compare that with a world of government-imposed price caps. Those ceilings force businesses to sell in-demand goods at artificially low prices, which fail to signal that said goods are scarce. Absent that marker, supplies are then quickly exhausted, depriving many vulnerable people of the ability to get their hands on any.

Though most critics claim price-gougers are the ones depriving needy people of important goods, that's rarely true in practice. Consider this hypothetical: Businesses across the state of California (a nod to Newsom) opt to not raise prices on hand sanitizer, greatly increasing the likelihood that a small cohort of people concerned about coronavirus will buy a large share of the item in bulk. Since there is a limited supply of hand sanitizer in the marketplace, the immobile elderly woman next door who hadn't yet made her assisted sojourn to CVS is basically out of luck. And, in this case, she is more at risk of succumbing to the disease, should she contract it.

Perhaps worst of all, regulatory restrictions on pricing can, in some cases, force third-party sellers to exit the market entirely, as seen with eBay. Though it sounds like a doomsday scenario, it's exactly what the retail giant chose to do yesterday when it began pulling all surgical face masks, hand sanitizers, and disinfectant wipes, opting not to go head-to-head with the 34 states that have strict price-gouging regulations. While the consequences vary across the U.S., the liabilities clearly outweighed the risk of selling vital goods.


Related Solutions

Companies should not provide training to employees because it is the responsibility of the individuals to...
Companies should not provide training to employees because it is the responsibility of the individuals to possess the necessary knowledge and skills prior to becoming employed. “1. Should companies provide training to employees or not? . Whose responsibility is it to ensure that employees are properly trained for their roles/positions within an organization? What laws come into play when we are discussing training and employment of qualified individual
in massachusetts, there are many private companies selling life insurance at competative prices but no one...
in massachusetts, there are many private companies selling life insurance at competative prices but no one sells inckme insurance to protect people from losing their jobs or being forced to take work at signifigantly lower earnings. why do competative markets work better for life insurance than for income insurance?
If an internal selling division can also sell products to outside companies at a prices that...
If an internal selling division can also sell products to outside companies at a prices that are greater than the selling division's marginal costs for these products how should the selling division set its transfer prices for these same products when it sells them to the internal buying division?
) Should executives and directors be sent to jail for the acts of their corporation’s employees?
) Should executives and directors be sent to jail for the acts of their corporation’s employees?
Why should transfer prices equal the marginal cost of the selling division within a company that...
Why should transfer prices equal the marginal cost of the selling division within a company that is selling to a buying , division in the same company when this same selling division has no opportunity to make any sales of what it sells to third parties outside the corporation. In your answer make sure you fully explain the double marginalization issue that arises if transfer prices are set higher in this situation than marginal costs
In theory, all firms (and individuals) should budget for operations. In practice, however, many companies (and...
In theory, all firms (and individuals) should budget for operations. In practice, however, many companies (and people) do not use a formal budgeting process as part of their financial planning. Describe the budgeting process used at your current or previous place of employment, or in your personal life.
1. As an alternative to selling shares of stock as a means of raising funds, a...
1. As an alternative to selling shares of stock as a means of raising funds, a large company could, instead, a)invest in physical capital b)use equity finance c)sell bonds d)purchase bonds 2. The economy's two most important financial markets are a)the investment market and the saving market b)the bond market and the stock market c)banks and the stock market d)financial markets and financial institutions 3. Two of the economy's most important financial intermediaries are a)suppliers of funds and demanders of...
Imagine an owner of a firm that is thinking about raising prices. Describe the consequences of...
Imagine an owner of a firm that is thinking about raising prices. Describe the consequences of doing so as a monopolist, oligopolist, monopolistic competitor, and perfect competitor. Include in your answer the definition and an example of each type of these market conditions.
imagine an owner of a firm is thinking about raising prices. Describe the consequence of doungso...
imagine an owner of a firm is thinking about raising prices. Describe the consequence of doungso as a, oligopplist, monopolistic competitor, and perfect competitor. what are the key differences between monopolistic competition and perfect competition? One of the concern about Walmart's entey into grocery business in latter part of the 1990s was that it was set low prices, drives, drive little stores out of business, and then raise prices to monopoly levels when it had competition. can you explain why...
Why would stock prices increase if investors believe that the Federal Reserve will not be raising...
Why would stock prices increase if investors believe that the Federal Reserve will not be raising interest rates and may even be cutting them? Why Does Wall Street Care about Monetary Policy?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT