In: Economics
Price Discrimination
Promoters of a major college basketball tournament estimate that the demand for tickets on the part of adults is given by QA = 5,000 – 10PA, and that demand for tickets on the part of students is given by QS = 10,000 – 100PS. The promoters wish to segment the market and charge adults and students different prices. They estimate that the marginal and average total cost of seating an additional spectator is constant at $10 (i.e. there are no fixed costs).
If promoters segment the market and charge different prices:
--
Profit maximizing price and quantity for adults: MR = MC
Here, QA = 5,000 – 10PA
Thus MR = 5000 - 20PA
Equate MR = MC
5000 - 20P = 10
4990 = 20P
P = $249.5
Thus, Q = 2505 seats
--
Profit maximizing price and quantity for students: MR = MC
QS = 10,000 – 100PS
Thus, MR = 10,000 - 200PS
Equate MC = MR
10,000 - 200P = 10
9990 = 200P
P = $49.95
Thus, Q = 3995 seats
---
Total Profit = TR - TC
Take TR and TC for both students and adults as under:
= [(249.95 x 2505) + (49.95 x 3995)] - [(2505 x 10) + (3995 x 10)]
= [626124.75 + 199550.25] - [25050 + 39950]
= 825675 - 65000
Profits = $760,675
---
If promoters charge the same prices:
The demand curves get aggregated:
Q= (5,000 – 10P) + (10,000 – 100P)
Q = 15,000 - 110P
Thus, MR = 15,000 - 220P
Equate MR = MC
15,000 - 220P = 10
14990 = 220P
P = $68.14
Thus, Q = 7505 seats
Total Profit = TR - TC
= (68.14 x 7505) - (10 x 7505)
Profits = $436,340.7
---
It can be clearly seen that price discrimination (by segmenting the market) leads to a much higher profit.