In: Statistics and Probability
Imagine you performed a “beer goggling” experiment and randomly assigned participants to drink either 0, 1, or 3 beers, and then had all participants rate the attractiveness of the same fellow college student on a scale from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater perceived attractiveness. There was a total of 21 participants in this study, divided evenly among the three coding conditions. Assume p < .05. Use these data to answer the following questions.
Group |
/ Mean Attractiveness Rating |
0 beer = |
21.57 |
1 beer |
= 26.57 |
3 beers |
= 35.71 |
Source | SS | df | MS | F |
Between | 720.096 | 2 | 360.048 | 21.54 |
Within | 300.857 | 18 | 16.714 |
A. in a post-hoc what is HSD value and what is the effect size of this data?
thank you for the help
Let's perform Tukey's Post hoc HSD test for above three groups
M0 = group with 0 beer
M1 = group with 1 beer
M3 = group with 3 beers
From above Anova Tales,
MSwithin =16.714;
M0 = 21.57;
M1 = 26.57;
M3 = 35.71;
dfwithin = 18;
n = 7(21 participants are equally divided into 3 groups)
Now, formula for HSD statistic is:
Where:
Applying Above formula we get,
Now, HSD(M3 vs M0) = 9.150
Similarly, HSD(M3 vs M1) = 5.915
HSD(M1 vs M0) = 3.235
From Tukey critical value table, HSD score df =18 and n = 7 for alpha = 0.05 is: 4.67
Now HSD values of M3 vs M1 and M3 vs M0is more than HSD score from table. Hence both the means are significantly different. So, M3-M1 and M3-M0 are significant.
On the other hand, HSD for M1 vs M0 is less than critical score. Hence we can say that mean for M1 and M0 is significantly same.