Question

In: Economics

1. The purchasing power parity predicts that if the price level in the US falls relative...

1.

The purchasing power parity predicts that if the price level in the US falls relative to Mexico,

a.

​PPP predicts price level will normalize in the long-run

b.

​The dollar will depreciate relative to the peso

c.

​The dollar will appreciate relative to the peso

d.

​There is no effect on either currency

2.

A widget costs $50 in the US and CAD$53 in Canada. The current exchange rate is 1USD=1.09CAD. At this rate,

a.

​The good costs more in the US

b.

​The good costs more in Canada

c.

​The good costs the same across the two countries

d.

​None of the above

3.

A weaker peso, relative to the US dollar, causes the demand for Mexican exports to_______ and US imports to ________

a.

​Increase; Decrease

b.

​Increase; Increase

c.

​Decrease; Decrease

d.

​Decrease; Increase

4.

John wants to buy a new television set. He can either buy it in the US and pay $1200 or buy it in Canada and pay CAD$1300. At the exchange rate of 1CA$=US$0.92, ignoring any other costs, he would

a.

​Prefer buying in the US

b.

​Prefer buying in Canada

c.

​Be indifferent about where he buys his television

d.

​None of the above

5.

​ Currency devaluations hurt consumers because they make imports ________ expensive

a.

​Less

b.

​More

c.

​All of the above

d.

​None of the above

6.

Purchasing power parity suggests that

a.

​Given fixed prices, interest rates adjust so that a good costs the same across two countries

b.

​Given fixed exchange rates, prices adjust such that a good costs the same across two countries

c.

​All of the above

d.

​None of the above

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) the purchasing power parity predicts that if the price level in the US falls relative to to Mexico, the dollar will appreciate related to the peso due to Decreased Inflation in US.

Hence, option c is correct.

2) 1USD= 1.09 CAD $

50 USD= 54.5 CAD $

So, the Widget cost 54.5 CAD $ in US and 53 CAD$ in Canada.

Hence, Option a is correct.

3) A weaker peso, realtive to US dollar, causes the demand for Mexican exports to increase because Mexican goods are now cheaper for US residents and US imports to increase.

Hence, option b is correct.

4) 1 CAD$= US$ 0.92

1300 CAD$= US$1196

Cost of of a new television set is lower in in Canada, so the consumer would prefer buying in Canada.

Hence, option b is correct

5) currency devaluation hurt consumers because they make imports more expensive because of the lower value of their currency.

Hence, option b is correct.

6) purchasing power parity suggests that given fixed exchange rates, prices adjust such that a good costs the same across two countries maintaining the law of One price.

Hence, Option b is correct


Related Solutions

7.Relative purchasing power parity applications             a.Define relative purchasing power parity b.Show the relationship between relative...
7.Relative purchasing power parity applications             a.Define relative purchasing power parity b.Show the relationship between relative purchasing power parity and the inflation rates in the two countries for which the spot exchange rate is also available. c.What is the difference between absolute and relative purchasing power parity?
1. The concept of Purchasing Power Parity is the result of equalization of _____. a. price...
1. The concept of Purchasing Power Parity is the result of equalization of _____. a. price of financial assets b. price of labor c. price of goods d. price of currencies 2. The concept of Interest Rate Parity is the result of equalization of _____. a. price of financial assets b. price of labor c. price of goods d. price of currencies 3. Which of these are reasons why Interest Rate Parity might not be completely valid in real life?...
Law of one price and Purchasing-power-parity theory We employ a theory called the Purchasing Power Parity...
Law of one price and Purchasing-power-parity theory We employ a theory called the Purchasing Power Parity to explain the movement of nominal exchange rate. The PPP theory is built on the Law of One Price, which states that a currency must have the same purchasing power in all countries. Based one this assumption, PPP theory establishes the functional relationship between Nominal exchange rate, domestic price level, and foreign price level. Suppose you are provided with the following information: 1) P...
1. Explain the two concepts of absolute and relative purchasing power parity. Do you believe that...
1. Explain the two concepts of absolute and relative purchasing power parity. Do you believe that either absolute and/or relative PPP hold? 2. Why does the carry trade offer such attractive returns?
1. Compare and contrast interest rate parity and purchasing power parity.
1. Compare and contrast interest rate parity and purchasing power parity.
Considering Purchasing Power Parity and the Law of One Price: a. Assume that the current price...
Considering Purchasing Power Parity and the Law of One Price: a. Assume that the current price of a Big Mac in the United States today is $2.75. Assume also that the current price of a Big Mac in Malaysia is 6.5000 ringgits and that the current USDMYR exchange rate is 3.0250 ringgits per $. What is the implied PPP of the USD? b. Using the assumptions above, what is the under (-) / over (+) valuation of Malaysian ringgits versus...
What is purchasing power parity? Why might exchange rates deviate from purchasing power parity?
What is purchasing power parity? Why might exchange rates deviate from purchasing power parity?
Purchasing Power Parity and Monetary Models of Exchange Rates Explain the difference between absolute and relative...
Purchasing Power Parity and Monetary Models of Exchange Rates Explain the difference between absolute and relative PPP. Why might the latter be more realistic?
Exchange rates are affected by the law of one price and purchasing power parity (PPP) in...
Exchange rates are affected by the law of one price and purchasing power parity (PPP) in the long-run. Exchange rates are affected by the interest-rate parity condition in the short-run (Interest rate on domestic bond = Interest rate on foreign bond minus Expected appreciation of the domestic currency). What do these mean?
What do we mean by "relative purchasing power parity"? Describe the Balassa-Samuelson critique of this doctrine:...
What do we mean by "relative purchasing power parity"? Describe the Balassa-Samuelson critique of this doctrine: present this critique algebraically,
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT