Question

In: Operations Management

IN THE DECADE between 2005 and 2015, LEGO—the famous Danish toy company—grew fivefold from some $1...

IN THE DECADE between 2005 and 2015, LEGO—the famous Danish toy company—grew fivefold from some $1 billion in revenues to $5 billion (see Exhibit MC12.1). Rediscovering, leveraging, and extending its core competence allowed a successful revival for a company that was floundering in the early 2000s. How did LEGO construct a successful turnaround? To answer this question, we first need to understand a bit of the history of this Danish wonder company.

The LEGO company was founded in 1932 by Ole Kirk Kristiansen. The name is a contraction of the Danish words Leg godt, which means “play well.” Only later did LEGO executives realize that le go in Latin also means “I assemble.” Throughout its history, LEGO has had numerous formidable competitors, but it has outperformed all of them. Tinkertoys were more complex, Lincoln Logs were limited in what could be constructed, traditional blocks had nothing to hold them together and were too large to show much detail. LEGO bricks were the right balance of simplicity, versatility, and durability.

LEGO competes for the attention of children and their parents who buy the product. Moreover, there is also a sizable group of adult LEGO fans. In the wake of the personal computer revolution in the 1990s, however, the popularity of LEGO began to wane because of attractive alternatives for children such as gaming consoles and computer games. By 1998, LEGO was in trouble. The Danish toymaker hired a highly touted turnaround expert to change its fortune. Unfortunately, he had no background in the toy industry. To make matters worse, the new executive decided that LEGO’s hometown of Billund, Denmark, (with 6,000 people) was too provincial. He continued to live in Paris and either commute or run the company remotely.

Things at LEGO went from bad too worse. It started hyperinnovating and diversified into too many areas, too quickly, and too far away from its core. Among a whole slew of other innovation failures, the company created a Saturday morning cartoon called “Galidor,” which flopped. During this time period, it also decided to become a lifestyle company and to offer LEGO-branded clothing and accessories.

LEGO’s Turnaround

By 2003, LEGO was on the verge of bankruptcy. To avoid this fate, the closely held private company, owned by the Kristiansen family since its inception, needed to do something drastic and quickly. Almost out of desperation, it hired Jørgen Vig Knudstorp as CEO. His résumé was quite unusual to say the least: He was only 35 years old (in comparison, the average age for a Fortune 500 CEO is 55 years), held a doctorate in economics, and was a former academic. Knudstorp had transitioned to McKinsey, one of the world’s premier strategy consulting firms.

Page 458

Knudstorp decreed that LEGO must “go back to the brick” and focus on core products. As a result of the strategic refocusing, LEGO divested a number of assets including its theme parks. It also drastically culled its product portfolio by almost 50 percent, from some 13,000 pieces to 7,000. At the same time as Knudstorp focused LEGO again on its fundamental strengths, he was also careful to balance exploitation—applying current knowledge to enhance firm performance in the short term—with exploration—searching for new knowledge that may enhance a firm’s future performance. This allowed LEGO to improve the performance of traditional product lines, while at the same time to innovate, but this time in a much more disciplined manner.

In particular, LEGO increased sales of its well-known existing products by strengthening the interoperability of various LEGO pieces with other sets to encourage user innovation and creativity. To drive innovation, LEGO has brought its adult fans into the new product development process to leverage crowd-sourcing—obtaining ideas from a large fan base using online forums and other Internet-based technologies. To drive future growth, LEGO under Knudstorp has been much more careful with its product extensions. In the past LEGO had licensed its brand freely to other brands, including Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Harry Potter, the Lord of the Rings, Batman, the Simpsons, and Iron Man. The problem was that the benefits from these licensing agreements accrued mainly to the existing brands, because LEGO did not own the more critical intellectual property. Knudstorp focused on owning and leveraging the core intellectual property. As a case in point, The LEGO Movie in 2014 was a particular high for the company, grossing $500 million on a $60 million budget in the first year alone. Unlike in previous movie tie-ins, LEGO owned the intellectual property, which meant that LEGO did not need to split profits with existing brands.

Challenges

Although LEGO has grown fivefold since Knudstorp took over, it faces a number of challenges. LEGO needs to strengthen its triple-bottom-line performance (along economic, social, and ecological dimensions) and address globalization challenges.

LEGO must address ecological concerns in the face of growing consumer criticism: Its signature bricks are made from petroleum-based plastic. The company is searching for an environmentally friendly material to replace its bricks that date back to 1963. To overcome its relatively large carbon footprint, the company is spending millions on a 15-year R&D project in hope of finding an eco-friendly alternative. The goal is to invent and then be able to manufacture bricks cost-effectively from a new bio-friendly material that will be virtually indistinguishable from the current blocks. It is a difficult problem to solve because LEGObricks are precisely engineered to Page 459four-thousandths of a millimeter, hold a large range of colors well, and even have a particular sound when two pieces are snapped together.

To continue to grow, LEGO must become stronger in emerging growth markets such as China. LEGO is a comparatively new entry into China because of the fear that knockoff bricks have sufficiently damaged its brand. Knockoffs, which are rampant in China, are of inferior quality and even have injured some consumers. Yet, with growth in Western markets plateauing and a larger number of Chinese entering the middle class, this market opportunity is critical to LEGO’s future success. Moreover, Chinese government officials endorse LEGO as a “mind toy,” which helps children to develop creativity. The hope is that creative children will grow up to drive innovation in firms, something many critics say Chinese companies lack. In addition, Chinese parents and grandparents are eager to spend money on things that are perceived to help their offspring to excel academically. In general, parents around the globe are more than happy to spend money on games that get their children away from mobile devices, computers, and game consoles.

To take advantage of the growth opportunity in China and other Asian countries such as India and Indonesia, LEGO opened offices in Shanghai and Singapore as well as a factory in Jiaxing, China. To address the globalization challenge more generally, LEGO also needs to internationalize its management. At this point, it is a local, small-town company that happened to be successful globally, especially in the West. LEGO hopes to become a global company that happens to have its headquarters in the 6,000-people town of Billund, Denmark.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

1.  Why did LEGO face bankruptcy in the early 2000s? In your reasoning, focus on both external and internal factors.

2.  What is LEGO’s core competence? Explain.

3.  Apply the core competence–market matrix to show how LEGO leveraged its core competence into existing and new markets under Jørgen Vig Knudstorp, who was appointed CEO in late 2004.

4.  In terms of revenue growth, LEGO experienced a competitive advantage over both Hasbro and Mattel since 2007 because it grew much faster. What explains LEGO’s competitive advantage?

5.  What must LEGO do to sustain its competitive advantage in the future? One avenue to tackle this question is to think about diversification, both along products but also geography. Another avenue is partnerships such as strategic alliances or even acquisitions. What lessons from LEGO’s past should guide its future diversification?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer 1:- By 1998 LEGO hired a highly touted turnaround expert in order to change its fortune but the expert was lacking any experience of the Toy industry

In the opinion of CEO of the company, the home of the firm which was in Billund, Denmark was very much provincial, He was living in Paris and had to run or join the office remotely.

The company began to innovate hyper toys and started to look too much of diversification which was too fast and too far from the core business. Thus company faced a lot of failures. The company developed a Saturday morning cartoon called Galidor which was not a successful attempt.

At this time, the company also decided to expand into lifestyle segment and to offer LEGO branded clothing and accessories.

Answer 2:- The core competence of LEGO was to make simple bricks which had the correct combination of simplicity, durability, and versatility.

Answer 4:- There was a lot of difficulties with Tinkertoys. Lincoln Logs were restricted in what could be offered. There was nothing left which can hold together the traditional blocks and they were too large to depict any details. The company has the bricks which had the correct combination of simplicity, durability, and versatility which was not present in Hasbro and Mattel.

Answer 5:- Product:- The company should keep innovative to be relevant for example it can come up with LEGGO movies

Expansion:- The company should try to become worldwide firm and should focus on Asian market as the firm has almost no presence there.

  • Strategic Alliance:- As the company did it in past by licensing its products to others including Indian Jones, Star Wars, Harry Potter, The Lords of the Rings and so on. The main issue here is that the advantages from these agreements accrued mainly to the current brands as the company lack any intellectual property and thus the focus of the company should be on developing its own intellectual property.

Related Solutions

The well-known Danish toy company Lego Group reported its first loss in 1998 since the 1930s....
The well-known Danish toy company Lego Group reported its first loss in 1998 since the 1930s. While its bright plastic bricks are famous around the globe, Lego is rapidly losing its market share to the computer and video games. The company’s President said, “The Lego Group is not in critical condition, but action is needed. We need to acknowledge that growth and innovation are not enough. We also have to be a profitable business.” Discuss the meaning of profitability with...
2. Some have argued that the 1980s was a decade in which the international economy grew...
2. Some have argued that the 1980s was a decade in which the international economy grew in importance, with special relevance for the formerly planned socialist economic systems. How have the contours of the international economy changed, and how will the formerly planned socialist systems be integrated into the new world order? write 1/2 page.
Part 1   (1 point) Suppose that between 2015 and 2016, nominal GDP grew by 6%. If the...
Part 1   (1 point) Suppose that between 2015 and 2016, nominal GDP grew by 6%. If the price level grew by 2% and population grew by 1.5%, real per capita GDP grew by    %. Part 2   (1 point) If real per capita GDP continues to grow at this rate, it would double in     years. Give your answer to the second decimal.
Problem 4: Antismoking Campaign (no data set is posted for this problem). From 2005 to 2015,...
Problem 4: Antismoking Campaign (no data set is posted for this problem). From 2005 to 2015, an intensive antismoking campaign has been sponsored by the U.S federal government. Suppose in both years, the American Cancer Society randomly and independently sampled 2,000 adults. In 2005, they discovered 418 of the 2,000 sampled defined themselves as smokers. In 2015, they discovered 302 of the 2,000 sampled defined themselves as smokers. Define the population parameter in context in one sentence. Calculate the two...
1. Some experts estimated that national health spending in the United States grew at 1% in...
1. Some experts estimated that national health spending in the United States grew at 1% in excess of the growth rates of GDP. Assume that this trend would persist for the foreseeable future, and given the fact that the share of GDP on health spending stood at 18% in 2016, what would become the share in 2064, 45 years from now (and 48 years from 2016, the base year), when most of you would enter the traditional retirement age? We...
The following example pertains to Bluefield Company for 2005. Cash received from customers during 2005$140,000 Cash...
The following example pertains to Bluefield Company for 2005. Cash received from customers during 2005$140,000 Cash received from tenants during 2005    56,000 Cash paid for salaries during 2005    43,000 Cash paid for income taxes during 2005    23,000 Cash paid to suppliers during 2005    78,000 Jan. 1Dec. 31 Accounts receivable$5,000$9,000 Accounts payable11,000   7,000 Income tax payable    7,000    3,000 Inventory14,00020,000 Prepaid salaries 4,000    2,000 Unearned rent revenue 1,000    6,000 Instructions Compute the amount of each of the following items for 2005 on the accrual basis. 1. Sales...
Google stock rose from $208 at year-end 2005 to $770 per share at year-end 2015. Google...
Google stock rose from $208 at year-end 2005 to $770 per share at year-end 2015. Google has made sizable profits but never paid a dividend. Why were people willing to pay such a high price knowing that they might not get dividends for many years?
Over time, Google grew from an Internet search company to a global mass of related and...
Over time, Google grew from an Internet search company to a global mass of related and unrelated businesses operating around the globe. Google’s founders decided to give the organization a new name, Alphabet, to reflect its current diversity. They also gave it a new structure that would allow the highly specialized operations to function interdependently, meaning that there is flexibility and some autonomy but also unification and coordination. What type of structure is Alphabet using? a. International divisions b. Global...
1)   On January 1, 2005 Able Company purchased all of the stock of Baker Company. On...
1)   On January 1, 2005 Able Company purchased all of the stock of Baker Company. On January 1, 2010, Able purchased a piece of equipment for $50,000. This equipment is expected to last 8 years with a 2000 salvage. On January 1, 2011 Able sold the equipment to Baker for $50,000. Baker believes the asset has 7 years of life remaining and a $1,000 salvage. On January 1, 2013 Baker sold the equipment to Cat Company for $30,000.   Make all...
Choice Hotels Marriott International (2016/2015)-1 (2016/2015)-1 Ratios 2016 2015 2016 2015 Percent Change from 2015 to...
Choice Hotels Marriott International (2016/2015)-1 (2016/2015)-1 Ratios 2016 2015 2016 2015 Percent Change from 2015 to 2016 Percent Change from 2015 to 2016 Choice Marriott Basic earning power (BEP) ratio = earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) / total assets 3.5 3.2 0.06 0.23 0.09 2.98 Return on equity (ROE) = net profit / total equity -0.45 -0.32 0.15 -0.24 0.41 -1.61 Return on assets (ROA) = net income / total assets 0.16 0.18 0.03 0.14 -0.08 -0.77 Profit margin...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT