Question

In: Finance

Suppose Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that...

Suppose Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that will require an initial investment of $450,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows:

Year

Cash Flow

Year 1 $350,000
Year 2 $425,000
Year 3 $500,000
Year 4 $400,000

1. Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s weighted average cost of capital is 8%, and project Alpha has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Based on the cash flows, what is project Alpha’s net present value (NPV)?

2. Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s decision to accept or reject project Alpha is independent of its decisions on other projects. If the firm follows the NPV method, it should (accept/reject) project Alpha.

3. Which of the following statements best explains what it means when a project has an NPV of $0?

a. When a project has an NPV of $0, the project is earning a rate of return equal to the project’s weighted average cost of capital. It’s OK to accept a project with an NPV of $0, because the project is earning the required minimum rate of return.

b. When a project has an NPV of $0, the project is earning a rate of return less than the project’s weighted average cost of capital. It’s OK to accept the project, as long as the project’s profit is positive.

c. When a project has an NPV of $0, the project is earning a profit of $0. A firm should reject any project with an NPV of $0, because the project is not profitable.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution

1) NPV

Year Cash flows PV Factor @8% Present Value
1    3,50,000.00 0.9259     3,24,074.07
2    4,25,000.00 0.8573     3,64,369.00
3    5,00,000.00 0.7938     3,96,916.12
4    4,00,000.00 0.7350     2,94,011.94
PV 13,79,371.13
Investment     4,50,000.00
NPV     9,29,371.13

2) Decision.

Since the project have a positive NPV, the project should be accepted.

3)

  When a project has an NPV of $0, the project is earning a rate of return equal to the project’s weighted average cost of capital. It’s OK to accept a project with an NPV of $0, because the project is earning the required minimum rate of return.

If you discount a cash flow with 8% and gets a $0 NPV, then the analysis indicates that the investment will earn a 8% real return.


Related Solutions

Suppose Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that will...
Suppose Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Alpha) that will require an initial investment of $600,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Cash Flow 1 $275,000 2 $500,000 3 $425,000 4 $450,000 1. Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc.’s weighted average cost of capital is 7%, and project Alpha has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Based on the cash flows, what is project Alpha’s net present value...
Suppose Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc, is evaluation a proposed capital budgeting project (project alpha) that will...
Suppose Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc, is evaluation a proposed capital budgeting project (project alpha) that will require an initial investment of $400,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: year 1 375,000 year 2 425,000 year 3 450,000 year 4 450,000 Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc’s weighted average cost of the capital is 9%, and project alpha has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Based on the cash flows, what is project Alpha’s net present...
Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. reported sales of $743,000 at the end of last year; but...
Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. reported sales of $743,000 at the end of last year; but this year, sales are expected to grow by 9%. Green Caterpillar expects to maintain its current profit margin of 24% and dividend payout ratio of 15%. The firm’s total assets equaled $425,000 and were operated at full capacity. Green Caterpillar’s balance sheet shows the following current liabilities: accounts payable of $80,000, notes payable of $45,000, and accrued liabilities of $65,000. Based on the AFN...
1. The AFN equation Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. has the following end-of-year balance sheet: Green...
1. The AFN equation Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. has the following end-of-year balance sheet: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. Balance Sheet For the Year Ended on December 31 Assets Liabilities Current Assets: Current Liabilities: Cash and equivalents $150,000 Accounts payable $250,000 Accounts receivable 400,000 Accrued liabilities 150,000 Inventories 350,000 Notes payable 100,000 Total Current Assets $900,000 Total Current Liabilities $500,000 Net Fixed Assets: Long-Term Bonds 1,000,000 Net plant and equipment(cost minus depreciation) $2,100,000 Total Debt $1,500,000 Common Equity Common...
Company X is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial...
Company X is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project (project Sigma) that will require an initial investment of $850,000. Company X has been basing capital budgeting decisions on a project's NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the IRR method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the IRR is a better method because returns in percentage form are easier to understand and compare to required returns. Blue Llama Mining Company's WACC is 9%, and project Sigma...
Internal rate of return (IRR) Ziff Corp. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project that will...
Internal rate of return (IRR) Ziff Corp. is evaluating a proposed capital budgeting project that will require an initial investment of $1,550,000. The project is expected to generate the following net cash flows: Year Net Cash Flow 1 $350,000 2 $475,000 3 $400,000 4 $475,000 Ziff Corp. hasbeen basing capital budgeting decisions on a project’s NPV; however, its new CFO wants to start using the internal rate of return (IRR) method for capital budgeting decisions. The CFO says that the...
The capital budgeting director of Global Products, Inc. is evaluating a new project that would increase...
The capital budgeting director of Global Products, Inc. is evaluating a new project that would increase revenues by $60,000 per year. Associated annual related expenses for this project are estimated at $30,000. The projected cost of the project is $50,000. The project anticipates the immediate need of $10,000 in net operating working capital that should be recaptured at the end of the project’s three-year life. The marginal tax rate is 21%. The firm plans to depreciate the project using MACRS....
You are evaluating a capital budgeting project for your company that is expected to last for...
You are evaluating a capital budgeting project for your company that is expected to last for six years. The project begins with the purchase of a $1,200,000 investment in equipment. You are unsure what method of depreciation to use in your analysis, straight-line depreciation or the 5-year MACRS accelerated method. Straight-line depreciation results in the cost of the equipment depreciated evenly over its life. The 5-year MACRS depreciation rates are 20%, 32%, 19%, 12%, 11%, and 6%. Your company's WACC...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $125,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 10%, and its tax rate is 20%. a. What...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $150,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 10%, and its tax...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT