Question

• Walras and Jevons regarded economics as a science which quests for eternal general laws, where the verification is much less important than its explanatory power. Maxwell, on the other hand, said that mathematical formalism and physical phenomena are both sides of the same coin. Unless this is done, can the ‘eternal laws’ have an explanatory power?

Answer 1

ANSWER :-

☆Mathematical formalism is utilized to legitimize what's going on as a physical phenomenon  and it is physical phenomenon  that turns into the premise of suspicions utilized, for the making of mathematical formalism.

●In the event that mathematical formalism doesn't get reliable with what is anticipated in physical phenomenon , at that point it is some different factors that isn't considered by the mathematical  formalism. Thus, Maxwell is directly in saying that, both of these are the piece of same coin.

●On the off chance that it doesn't occur, eternal laws has the logical force in a constrained way, in light of the fact that there will be tremendous varieties in the conduct of individuals and it won't have the option to shape an objective clarification that can help clarify practices displayed as it is done in the Economics.

●Henceforth, it is consistently essential to carry some mathematical formalism to devise a framework that can foresee physical phenomenon , and when it occurs, at that point it is increasingly legitimized, objective and stable.

●Henceforth, it is significant for physical phenomenon  and mathematical  formalism to help one another, to make strong and stable explanatory power.

● On the off chance that not, at that point there will be a need of various clarifications for various social methodology, however the ecological setting will stay same.

PLEASE UPVOTE.