In: Economics
Suppose that as a consumer you have $34 per month to spend on munchies—either pizzas, which cost $6 each, or Twinkies, which cost $4 each. Suppose further that your preferences are given by the following total utility table. Copy the tables below to submit and solve for the missing marginal utility information in each. Remember that they must show diminishing marginal utility as more of each product is consumed. Graph the budget constraint with Pizzas on the horizontal axis and Twinkies on the vertical axis. What are the intercepts? Can you express the budget constraint as an algebraic equation for a line? # of Pizzas 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Marginal Utility Total Utility 60 108 138 156 162 166 166 # of Twinkies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Marginal Utility Total Utility 44 76 100 120 136 148 152 Should you purchase a Twinkie first or a Pizza first to get the “biggest bang for the buck”? How can you tell? What should you purchase second, third, etc. until you exhaust your budget? Make sure that your answer satisfies the utility maximizing rule and mathematical proof. Confirm that the combination of Twinkies and Pizzas you end up with will maximize your total utility by computing the total utility from other points on the budget line and comparing them to what you chose.
1) Budget constraint line:
34 = 6p + 4t where p = number of pizzas and t is number of twinkies
2) Graph.
p is on x acis; t is on y axis
Intercepts :
x intercept : When t = 0 ; p = 5.66
y intercept : When p = 0 ; t = 8.5
3)
Pizzas | Marginal Utility | Marginal Utility |
1 | 60 | 60 |
2 | 48 | 108 |
3 | 30 | 138 |
4 | 18 | 156 |
5 | 6 | 162 |
6 | 4 | 166 |
7 | 0 | 166 |
Twinkies | Marginal Utilty | Marginal Utility |
1 | 44 | 44 |
2 | 34 | 76 |
3 | 24 | 100 |
4 | 20 | 120 |
5 | 16 | 136 |
6 | 12 | 148 |
7 | 4 | 152 |
4)
Just on the basis of MU, We wouold have bought a Pizza first because its MU is greater than that of Twinkies. But, since we also need to keep in mind the budget constraint, it is better if we compare on the basis of MU per dollar rather than just MU.
Pizzas | Marginal Utility | Total Utility | MU per dollar |
1 | 60 | 60 | 10 |
2 | 48 | 108 | 8 |
3 | 30 | 138 | 5 |
4 | 18 | 156 | 3 |
5 | 6 | 162 | 1 |
6 | 4 | 166 | 0.666666667 |
7 | 0 | 166 | 0 |
Twinkies | Marginal Utility | Total Utility | MU per dollar |
1 | 44 | 44 | 11 |
2 | 34 | 76 | 8.5 |
3 | 24 | 100 | 6 |
4 | 20 | 120 | 5 |
5 | 16 | 136 | 4 |
6 | 12 | 148 | 3 |
7 | 4 | 152 | 1 |
Now based on per dollar MU , we choose next item on the basis of comparing MU per dollar.
Buying sequence | Item | Total Cost |
1st | Twinky | 4 |
2nd | Pizza | 10 |
3rd | Tinky | 14 |
4th | Pizza | 20 |
5th | Twinky | 24 |
6th | Pizza | 30 |
7th | Twinky | 34 |
Thus max utility when : 4 twinkies and 3 pizzas
Max utility = 120 + 138
= 258
Utility for other combinations on or below budget constraint
Pizza | Twinky | Total Utility |
1 | 7 | 212 |
2 | 5 | 244 |
3 | 4 | 258 |
4 | 2 | 232 |
5 | 1 | 206 |
0 | 8 | 152 |