In: Accounting
Third party verification of account balances are useful because it provides a legally trail and allows both vendors and customers to verify transactions that have taken place. Email confirmation are economically friendly and are ethical as well. Advantage of positive and negative confirmations:
Oral confirmations may not stand ethical and reliable. Hence, oral confirmation should not be practiced. Oral confirmation does not have any reliability, and these confirmations may not be able to gain 100% trust of the consumers.
Substantive test of transactions measures the operating
effectiveness of internal controls and the monetary correctness of
transactions in the accounting system. Substantive test of balances
measures whether the dollar amounts of account balances are
materially misstated. An auditor should test account balances if
they suspect that a balance may be understated. For example, if an
auditor obtains evidence that indicates that the accounts
receivable balance may be understated because the client did not
include a charge, then the auditor would test the balance to
determine the reasonableness of the account. An auditor should also
test account balances if they receive confirmations from customers
that are not reflected in the client’s records. Audit sampling for
test of balances measures monetary misstatements, which means that
a misstatement exists whenever a sample item is misstated. If a
customer balance does not match client records, an auditor should
test account balances by obtaining additional evidence to determine
the likelihood that the balances are fairly stated.