In: Finance
Your firm may purchase certain assets from a struggling competitor. The competitor is asking $50,000,000 for the assets. Last year, the assets produced revenues of $15,000,000. Revenues earned in the next year (i.e., year 1) and in future years are estimated using the information in the table below.
Your staff expects that the following assumptions will hold over the operating period:
Your staff has also identified three key areas of uncertainty, which include
Worst-Case |
Base-Case |
Best-Case |
|
Cash Expenses as a % of Revenues |
60% |
55% |
45% |
WACC |
20% |
15% |
8% |
Revenue Growth Rate |
-10% |
0% |
7% |
Probability |
10% |
80% |
10% |
For this case, address the following goals (each goal should be shown in a separate worksheet in an Excel workbook; provide labels on each worksheet):
Goal 1- Develop the annual pro forma after-tax cash flow statement for each scenario.
Goal 2- Calculate the NPV and IRR for each scenario. Within the Goal 2 worksheet, discuss/interpret the NPV and IRR values that you have calculated in terms of whether the acquisition should be accepted or rejected.
Goal 3- Use the probability distribution given along with your estimates from Goals 1 and 2 to calculate the expected value of the NPV and IRR for acquiring the assets. Interpret the expected values for both capital budgeting measures (compare your estimate of the expected value of the IRR to a benchmark IRR of 14.8%).
Goal 5- Discuss three ways in which your financing modeling assumptions may be incorrect and state the associated impact on the ATCFs, NPV and IRR. Your discussion should be at least 250 words. Proof read before submitting.
Goal-1:
Straight line depreciation = ((Value at the start - Salvage value)/(no. of years))
Worst case:
Last year revenue was $ 15,000,000 | ||||||||||
Years | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Revenue (in $) (growing by -10%%) | 13500000 | 12150000 | 10935000 | 9841500 | 8857350 | 7971615 | 7174454 | 6457008 | 5811307 | 5230177 |
Cash Expense (in $) (60% of revenues) | 8100000 | 7290000 | 6561000 | 5904900 | 5314410 | 4782969 | 4304672 | 3874205 | 3486784 | 3138106 |
Depreciation (in $) (50,000,000/10= $500,000 every year) | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 |
Profit (in $) (revenue- cash expense-depreciation) | 49,00,000 | 43,60,000 | 38,74,000 | 34,36,600 | 30,42,940 | 26,88,646 | 23,69,781 | 20,82,803 | 18,24,523 | 15,92,071 |
Tax (in $) (20% of profit) | 980000 | 872000 | 774800 | 687320 | 608588 | 537729.2 | 473956.3 | 416560.7 | 364904.6 | 318414.1 |
After tax cash flow (in $) (Profit -Tax) | 39,20,000 | 3488000 | 3099200 | 2749280 | 2434352 | 2150917 | 1895825 | 1666243 | 1459618 | 1273657 |
Base case:
Last year revenue was $ 15,000,000 | ||||||||||
Years | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Revenue (in $) (growing by 0%%) | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 | 15000000 |
Cash Expense (in $) (55% of revenues) | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 | 8250000 |
Depreciation (in $) (50,000,000/10= $500,000 every year) | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 |
Profit (in $) (revenue- cash expense-depreciation) | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 | 62,50,000 |
Tax (in $) (20% of profit) | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 | 1250000 |
After tax cash flow (in $) (Profit -Tax) | 50,00,000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 | 5000000 |
Best case:
Last year revenue was $ 15,000,000 | ||||||||||
Years | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Revenue (in $) (growing by 0%%) | 16050000 | 17173500 | 18375645 | 19661940.15 | 21038275.96 | 22510955.28 | 24086722.15 | 25772793 | 27576888 | 29507270 |
Cash Expense (in $) (45% of revenues) | 7222500 | 7728075 | 8269040 | 8847873.068 | 9467224.182 | 10129929.87 | 10839024.97 | 11597757 | 12409600 | 13278272 |
Depreciation (in $) (50,000,000/10= $500,000 every year) | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 | 5,00,000 |
Profit (in $) (revenue- cash expense-depreciation) | 83,27,500 | 89,45,425 | 96,06,605 | 1,03,14,067 | 1,10,71,052 | 1,18,81,025 | 1,27,47,697 | ######## | ######## | ######## |
Tax (in $) (20% of profit) | 1665500 | 1789085 | 1921321 | 2062813.417 | 2214210.356 | 2376205.081 | 2549539.436 | 2735007 | 2933458 | 3145800 |
After tax cash flow (in $) (Profit -Tax) | 66,62,000 | 7156340 | 7685284 | 8251253.666 | 8856841.423 | 9504820.322 | 10198157.74 | 10940029 | 11733831 | 12583199 |
Goal 2:
Worst case:
Years | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
After-tax cash flow | -5,00,00,000 | 39,20,000 | 34,88,000 | 30,99,200 | 27,49,280 | 24,34,352 | 21,50,917 | 18,95,825 | 16,66,243 | 14,59,618 | 12,73,657 |
WACC (Cost of capital) | 20% | ||||||||||
PV ((After tax cash flow/((1+WACC)^n)); n=No. of year | -50000000 | 3266667 | 2422222 | 1793519 | 1325848.765 | 978311.4712 | 720337.6843 | 529089.9974 | 387514.8 | 282883.8 | 205702.6 |
NPV (Sum of present value of after tax cash flow) | -38087903.4 | ||||||||||
IRR (Summation till 10th year (((After tax cash flow/((1+IRR)^n)); n =10) | -28% |
Base case:
Years | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
After-tax cash flow | -5,00,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 | 50,00,000 |
WACC (Cost of capital) | 20% | ||||||||||
PV ((After tax cash flow/((1+WACC)^n)); n=No. of year | -50000000 | 4166667 | 3472222 | 2893519 | 2411265.432 | 2009387.86 | 1674489.883 | 1395408.236 | 1162840 | 969033.5 | 807527.9 |
NPV (Sum of present value of after tax cash flow) | -29037639.6 | ||||||||||
IRR (Summation till 10th year (((After tax cash flow/((1+IRR)^n)); n =10) | -17% |
Best case:
Years | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
After-tax cash flow | -5,00,00,000 | 66,62,000 | 71,56,340 | 76,85,284 | 82,51,254 | 88,56,841 | 95,04,820 | 1,01,98,158 | ######## | ######## | ######## |
WACC (Cost of capital) | 20% | ||||||||||
PV ((After tax cash flow/((1+WACC)^n)); n=No. of year | -50000000 | 5551667 | 4969681 | 4447502 | 3979192.547 | 3559365.927 | 3183145.095 | 2846118.662 | 2544301 | 2274095 | 2032257 |
NPV (Sum of present value of after tax cash flow) | -14612675.4 | ||||||||||
IRR (Summation till 10th year (((After tax cash flow/((1+IRR)^n)); n =10) | -7% |
In all the 3 cases, we are getting a negative NPA and IRR.
For the project to viable, it should have positive NPV and IRR more than WACC (Cost of capital).
In this case, we will reject the project.
Goal 3:
Expected value of NPV = Probability of worst case scenario * NPV (worst case scenario)+ Probability of base case scenario * NPV (base case scenario) + Probability of best case scenario * NPV (best case scenario)
= 0.1* -38087903.4 + 0.8* -29037639.6 + 0.1*-14612675.4
= $ -28500169.6
Expected value of IRR = Probability of worst case scenario * IRR (worst case scenario)+ Probability of base case scenario * IRR (base case scenario) + Probability of best case scenario * IRR (best case scenario)
= = 0.1* -28% + 0.8* -17% + 0.1*-7%
= -17.1%
Now, expected NPV and Expected IRR of the project are also coming out to be negative, therefore, project needs to be rejected because the project will not make any money.
Goal 4:
(a) Growth rate: Growth rate can be more or very less based on the future as to how it pans out. If the growth rate is very high, it will lead to high NPV and IRR, where as on the other hand, if it low then it will lead to very low NPV and IRR.
(B) Cost of capital: Cost of capital of the project can be very high or low. Very high cost of capital will lead to low NPV and IRR and low cost of capital will lead to high NPV and IRR.
(C) Expenses: Expenses can happen along with unexpected expenses. Depending on which NPV and IRR will change. If unexpected expenses happen, it will lead to low after tax cash flows which will lead to low NPV and IRR. Less expenses will lead to high after tax cash flows which will ultimately lead to higher NPV and IRR.