Question

In: Operations Management

Explain how case law Right of Ontario v Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. [1981] S.C.R....

Explain how case law Right of Ontario v Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. [1981] S.C.R. 111 played a pivotal role in establishing new contract concepts in Canada?

-  details and key facts of the claim

- contribution of the court’s decision to establish new bidding rules and laws

Solutions

Expert Solution

The case related to Right of Ontario v Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. of 1981 was considered to be the most important Supreme Court of Canada decision on the regulation of tendering for contracts. The case was related to the matter of whether the acceptance of a call for tenders for a construction work could represent a binding contract.

The Court held that in fact in many cases the submission of a proposal in reaction to a call for tenders represents a contract separate from the concluding contract for the construction. Thus with the release of the decision the tendering procedure experienced in Canada the way it functioned in earlier periods was basically further modified and transformed accordingly.

Supreme Court apprehended that the tender procedure in the case comprised of two contracts an independent contract occurring automatically upon the submission of a tender and the contract honored upon the tender's acceptance. Thus the court rulings had a considerable impact on the regulation concerned with erroneous and incorrect bids.

Thus the preceding regulation having been ruled against the erroneous bidder was basically averted from any kind of reprieve and assistance. The mistaken bidder’s bid deposit or bond was enforceable and the erroneous bidder could be enforced to go through the process of honoring the contract obligation and upon denial to do so face the consequences of a considerable and significant damages allegation and assertion.

Thus whether or not a bid contract takes place upon the submission of a biddable tender to a great extent depends on independent examination if it can be appropriately determined that the concerned parties have indeed independently proposed to enter into the contractual obligations upon its submission of the tender.


Related Solutions

Explain the significance of the case of Salomon v Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22....
Explain the significance of the case of Salomon v Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. (600 words please without plagiarism due in 12h)
Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide...
Insigna v Labella is a benchmark case in Corporate Law. Please brief this case and provide the following: What are the facts of this case? What is the legal question being asked? What was the significant legal issue resolved?
In †he 1973 case of Roe V. Wade, it was found that the negative right to...
In †he 1973 case of Roe V. Wade, it was found that the negative right to abortion only created an obligation to noninterference. In this light, do we curtly have a negative right to health care? Explain your answer.
What law pertains to the case Fletcher v South Peninsula and has that law changed since...
What law pertains to the case Fletcher v South Peninsula and has that law changed since then?
explain the case Letendre v Deines Micro- Film Services Ltd , 2001 ABQB 26 according to...
explain the case Letendre v Deines Micro- Film Services Ltd , 2001 ABQB 26 according to employment law on the basis of termination
Provide a case summary of the case ͞Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]͟ using the...
Provide a case summary of the case ͞Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]͟ using the IRAC method. What was the significance of this case law in relation to the legal concept of separate legal entity? Please i need this answer without plagiarism. thank you
Provide a case summary of the case “Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]” using the...
Provide a case summary of the case “Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]” using the IRAC method. What was the significance of this case law in relation to the legal concept of separate legal entity? Can you use Harvard referencing. thank you very much
Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford...
Please an expert is needed to solve Business law case. Janke v. Brooks Branham v. Ford Motor Co.
What are the issues in the case: Fletcher v. South Peninsula? and what law is relevant...
What are the issues in the case: Fletcher v. South Peninsula? and what law is relevant to the issue?
Provide a case summary of the case “Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33”...
Provide a case summary of the case “Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33” using the IRAC method. What legal principle came out of this case in relation to why the court lifted the corporate veil in this case? Please answer this without plagiarism. thanks you very much
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT