In: Statistics and Probability
For this discussion, you will compare these two categories of statistics, and explain which you feel is the most important to the biological sciences. Develop a main response in which you address the following:
Briefly summarize the main functions of descriptive and inferential statistics.
Identify which you feel is the most useful in the biological sciences.
Explain your position, providing supporting evidence from the textbook, other scholarly sources, and/or examples where possible.
I feel that inferential statistics are more useful in biological sciences because unlike descriptive statistics, inferential statistics are used to draw conclusions about the population if the sample is large and is a good representation of the entire population. Hence, these conclusions can be used in the biological sciences. For example, let's say there is a medicine that claims to improve the conditions of diabetic patients & you want to verify the same claim. You will take a sample from the population and form two groups, the one who takes that medicine for a few weeks and the other group which doesn't. You will then measure the difference between the both groups and claim that in general, for the entire public, this medicine is effective to improve the conditions for diabetic conditions. Now, if you just compared both the groups through data and didn't say anything about the population will be descriptive statistics. But now that you have concluded about the entire population that this medicine is effective is inferential statistics.