Question

In: Math

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1919 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 12301230 feet with a standard deviation of 3131 feet. A sample of 1111 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 11901190 feet with a standard deviation of 4242 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ2μ2 be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of α=0.1α=0.1 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 2 of 4 :  

Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

step 3 t/|t| is </> ____

reject, fail to reject

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:

Here, we have to use two sample t test for the difference between two population means by assuming equal population variances.

H0: µ1 = µ2 versus Ha: µ1 > µ2

This is an upper tailed test.

Test statistic formula for pooled variance t test is given as below:

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

Where Sp2 is pooled variance

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

We are given

X1bar = 1230

X2bar = 1190

S1 = 31

S2 = 42

n1 = 19

n2 = 11

df = n1 + n2 – 2 = 19 + 11 – 2 = 28

α = 0.10

Critical value = 1.3125

(by using t-table)

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

Sp2 = [(19 – 1)* 31^2 + (11 – 1)* 42^2]/(19 + 11 – 2)

Sp2 = 1247.7857

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

t = (1230 – 1190) / sqrt[1247.7857*((1/19)+(1/11))]

t = 40/13.3831

t = 2.9888

t = 2.989

P-value = 0.0029

(by using t-table)

P-value < α = 0.10

So, we reject the null hypothesis

Conclusion:

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor.


Related Solutions

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 12 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 29 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 16 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1260 feet with a standard deviation of 30 feet. A sample of 12 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 29 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1818 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 10201020 feet with a standard deviation of 2525 feet. A sample of 1313 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 10101010 feet with a standard deviation of 2929 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1616 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 12201220 feet with a standard deviation of 4141 feet. A sample of 1111 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 12001200 feet with a standard deviation of 2525 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 1919 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 11101110 feet with a standard deviation of 2222 feet. A sample of 1111 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 10601060 feet with a standard deviation of 2323 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 15phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. A sample of 6 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1200 feet with a standard deviation of 44feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean range of...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 9 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1120 feet with a standard deviation of 38 feet. A sample of 14 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1060 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 9 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1070 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 16 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 36 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1070 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 6 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT