Question

Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality?

Would internal validity and reliability be correct for this question or would you recommend something else?

Answer 1

Answer :

2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality :

This information blast is pushing undertakings in an additional information driven heading. Associations are presently performing complex investigation on their information. It causes them break down the market patterns, create streamlined activities and improve the client encounter

1. Information PROFILING

The initial phase in enhancing information quality is to look at your information absconds through information profiling. Information profiling examines the accuracy and uniqueness of information. It additionally checks whether the information is reusable by gathering suitable measurements. So also, information mining devices are additionally used to survey information quality.

2. Information NORMALIZATION

The second step is to standardize your information. Information standardization is vital on the grounds that information is gathered from different sources and may incorporate an assortment of spelling alternatives. It confounds CRMs as they consider them to be diverse information focuses. In this manner, information institutionalization is basic to setting up a solitary methodology and to expel excess.

Reliability

quality alludes to the consistency of a measure. Clinicians think about three kinds of consistency: after some time (test-retest dependability), crosswise over things (inside consistency), and crosswise over various analysts (between rater unwavering quality).

internal validity and reliability be correct for this question :-

Once more, estimation includes doling out scores to people with the goal that they speak to some normal for the people. Be that as it may, how do scientists realize that the scores really speak to the trademark, particularly when it is a develop like knowledge, confidence, misery, or working memory limit? The appropriate response is that they lead investigate utilizing the measure to affirm that the scores bode well dependent on their comprehension of the develop being estimated. This is a critical point. Clinicians don't just expect that their measures work. Rather, they gather information to exhibit that they work. On the off chance that their examination does not exhibit that a measure works, they quit utilizing it.

As a casual precedent, envision that you have been eating less junk food for multi month. Your garments appear to fit all the more freely, and a few companions have inquired as to whether you have shed pounds. In the event that now your washroom scale showed that you had shed 10 pounds, this would bode well and you would keep on utilizing the scale. In any case, in the event that it demonstrated that you had picked up 10 pounds, you would appropriately reason that it was broken and either settle it or dispose of it. In assessing an estimation technique, therapists think about two general measurements: unwavering quality and legitimacy.