Question

In: Accounting

Problem 3: Another Sleuth Question In 1/1/ 20x1 Co. X sold a machine. On that date...

Problem 3: Another Sleuth Question

  1. In 1/1/ 20x1 Co. X sold a machine. On that date the “Machinery” account had a balance of $400,000 and a balance of $500,000 at 2/31/x4. The Machinery Accumulated Depreciation Account had beginning and ending balances of $200,000 and $250,000, respectively. During the year Co. X purchased $120,000 of machinery and had $60,000 of Deprecation Expense
  • How much of Machinery Cost was written off on the sale of Machinery?

  • How much of Machinery Cost was written off on the sale of Machinery?
  • If the company experienced a loss on the sale of machinery of , how much cash was collected when the machinery was sold?                     

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Suppose that on that same date (January 1, 2020) Demon Deacon Co. enters into another lease...
Suppose that on that same date (January 1, 2020) Demon Deacon Co. enters into another lease contract. The lease arrangement is for 8 years, has a bargain purchase option for $15,000, but no residual value guarantee. The expected useful life of the asset is 10 years. The initial value of the capital lease asset (and liability) is $615,000. Lease payments are end-of-year payments of $93,583. Record the journal entries for this lease arrangement that would be made on December 31,...
Question 1: On July 1, Maged Co. sold merchandise on account to Hani Co. for $30,000...
Question 1: On July 1, Maged Co. sold merchandise on account to Hani Co. for $30,000 terms 2/10, n/30. On July 5, Hani returns merchandise worth $5000 to Maged Co. On July 10, Maged Co. receives payment from Hani Co. for the balance due. On Sept, 5, Maged Co. sold merchandise on account to Samy for $20,000 terms 2/10, n/30. On Sept. 20 Samy paid the amount due to Maged Co. Maged Co. writes off Salem Co. $4000 balance as...
Subject: financial reporting IFRS 5 – Photo processing machine On 1 January 20X1, Michelle Co. bought...
Subject: financial reporting IFRS 5 – Photo processing machine On 1 January 20X1, Michelle Co. bought a photo processing machine for €20,000. It had an expected useful life of 10 years and no residual value. On 31 December 20X2, after 2 years of using the machine, Michelle Co. decides to sell it and steps were taken to locate a buyer. The machines in question are in short supply, so Michelle Co. is confident that the machine will be sold quickly....
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture sport caps. The invoice price of the machine is $120,500. In addition, delivery and installation costs will total $4,500. The machine has the capacity to produce 12,000 dozen caps per year. Sales are forecast to increase gradually, and production volumes for each of the five years of the machine's life are expected to be as follows: Use Table 6-4. (Use appropriate factor(s) from the...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture sport caps. The invoice price of the machine is $124,500. In addition, delivery and installation costs will total $4,000. The machine has the capacity to produce 12,000 dozen caps per year. Sales are forecast to increase gradually, and production volumes for each of the five years of the machine's life are expected to be as follows: Use Table 6-4. (Use appropriate factor(s) from the...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture sport caps. The invoice price of the machine is $120,500. In addition, delivery and installation costs will total $4,500. The machine has the capacity to produce 12,000 dozen caps per year. Sales are forecast to increase gradually, and production volumes for each of the five years of the machine's life are expected to be as follows: Use Table 6-4. (Use appropriate factor(s) from the...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture sport caps. The invoice price of the machine is $123,000. In addition, delivery and installation costs will total $5,000. The machine has the capacity to produce 12,000 dozen caps per year. Sales are forecast to increase gradually, and production volumes for each of the five years of the machine's life are expected to be as follows: Use Table 6-4. (Use appropriate factor(s) from the...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture...
TopCap Co. is evaluating the purchase of another sewing machine that will be used to manufacture sport caps. The invoice price of the machine is $122,500. In addition, delivery and installation costs will total $5,000. The machine has the capacity to produce 12,000 dozen caps per year. Sales are forecast to increase gradually, and production volumes for each of the five years of the machine's life are expected to be as follows: Use Table 6-4. (Use appropriate factor(s) from the...
Perry Company purchased 100% of Starling Company on 1/1/20X1. At the date of acquisition, the following...
Perry Company purchased 100% of Starling Company on 1/1/20X1. At the date of acquisition, the following differences existed: Starling had a 20-year loan for $500,000. The fair value of the loan was $540,000. Starling had an unrecorded Patent with an estimated remaining life of 5 years. The fair value of the patent was $800,000. Any other differences between book value and fair value were attributable o goodwill. At 12/31/20X4, Starling still had the loan and patent that existed at the...
Question 1 ABC Ltd bought a property for office accommodation on 3 January 20X1 for $33m....
Question 1 ABC Ltd bought a property for office accommodation on 3 January 20X1 for $33m. The land component of the property was on a 60-year lease and was valued at $3m, the balance being the value of the building. The estimated useful life of the building was 30 years and the residual value was expected to be insignificant. On 1 January 20X2, the estimated useful life of the building was revised to 20 years from that date. This was...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT