In: Statistics and Probability
Tire |
Steering |
Tread Wear |
Buy Again |
Goodyear Assurance Triple Tred |
8.9 |
8.5 |
8.1 |
Michelin HydroEdge |
8.9 |
9.0 |
8.3 |
Michelin Harmony |
8.3 |
8.8 |
8.2 |
Dunlop SP60 |
8.2 |
8.5 |
7.9 |
Goodyear Assurance ComforTred |
7.9 |
7.7 |
7.1 |
Yokohama Y372 |
8.4 |
8.2 |
8.9 |
Yokohama Aegis LS4 |
7.9 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
Kumho Power Star 758 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
8.3 |
Goodyear Assurance |
7.6 |
5.8 |
4.5 |
Hankook H406 |
7.8 |
6.8 |
6.2 |
Michelin Energy LX4 |
7.4 |
5.7 |
4.8 |
Michelin MX4 |
7.0 |
6.5 |
5.3 |
Michelin Symmetry |
6.9 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
Kumho 722 |
7.2 |
6.6 |
5.0 |
Dunlop SP 40 A/S |
6.2 |
4.2 |
3.4 |
Bridgestone Insignia SE200 |
5.7 |
5.5 |
3.6 |
Goodyear Integrity |
5.7 |
5.4 |
2.9 |
Dunlop SP20 FE |
5.7 |
5.0 |
3.3 |
using excel>data>data analysis>Regression
we have
Simple Linear Regression Analysis | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.9182 | |||||
R Square | 0.8430 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.8332 | |||||
Standard Error | 0.8411 | |||||
Observations | 18 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 1 | 60.7866 | 60.7866 | 85.9295 | 0.0000 | |
Residual | 16 | 11.3184 | 0.7074 | |||
Total | 17 | 72.1050 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | -7.5218 | 1.4668 | -5.1282 | 0.0001 | -10.6312 | -4.4124 |
Steering | 1.8151 | 0.1958 | 9.2698 | 0.0000 | 1.4000 | 2.2302 |
a ) the estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the Buy Again rating given based on the Steering rating is
Buy Again = -7.5218+1.8151
since p-value of F stat is 0.0000 which is less than 0.05 so relationship between Buy again and steering rating is significant
b ) the estimated regression equation developed in part (a) provide a gives good fit to the data because about 84.30% variation in Buy again can be explained by steering rating .
uisng excel>data>data analysis>Regression
we have
Regression Analysis | ||||||
Regression Statistics | ||||||
Multiple R | 0.9653 | |||||
R Square | 0.9318 | |||||
Adjusted R Square | 0.9227 | |||||
Standard Error | 0.5727 | |||||
Observations | 18 | |||||
ANOVA | ||||||
df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
Regression | 2 | 67.1848 | 33.5924 | 102.4121 | 0.0000 | |
Residual | 15 | 4.9202 | 0.3280 | |||
Total | 17 | 72.1050 | ||||
Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
Intercept | -5.3877 | 1.1095 | -4.8558 | 0.0002 | -7.7526 | -3.0228 |
Steering | 0.6899 | 0.2875 | 2.3992 | 0.0299 | 0.0770 | 1.3028 |
Tread Wear | 0.9113 | 0.2063 | 4.4166 | 0.0005 | 0.4715 | 1.3511 |
c ) an estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the Buy Again rating given the Steering rating and the Tread Wear rating is
Buy Again = -5.3877+0.6899*Steering + 0.9113 *Treadwear
d ) yes, the addition of the Tread Wear independent variable is significant because p-value of Treadwear is less than 0.05