In: Statistics and Probability
| 
 Tire  | 
 Steering  | 
 Tread Wear  | 
 Buy Again  | 
| 
 Goodyear Assurance Triple Tred  | 
 8.9  | 
 8.5  | 
 8.1  | 
| 
 Michelin HydroEdge  | 
 8.9  | 
 9.0  | 
 8.3  | 
| 
 Michelin Harmony  | 
 8.3  | 
 8.8  | 
 8.2  | 
| 
 Dunlop SP60  | 
 8.2  | 
 8.5  | 
 7.9  | 
| 
 Goodyear Assurance ComforTred  | 
 7.9  | 
 7.7  | 
 7.1  | 
| 
 Yokohama Y372  | 
 8.4  | 
 8.2  | 
 8.9  | 
| 
 Yokohama Aegis LS4  | 
 7.9  | 
 7.0  | 
 7.1  | 
| 
 Kumho Power Star 758  | 
 7.9  | 
 7.9  | 
 8.3  | 
| 
 Goodyear Assurance  | 
 7.6  | 
 5.8  | 
 4.5  | 
| 
 Hankook H406  | 
 7.8  | 
 6.8  | 
 6.2  | 
| 
 Michelin Energy LX4  | 
 7.4  | 
 5.7  | 
 4.8  | 
| 
 Michelin MX4  | 
 7.0  | 
 6.5  | 
 5.3  | 
| 
 Michelin Symmetry  | 
 6.9  | 
 5.7  | 
 4.2  | 
| 
 Kumho 722  | 
 7.2  | 
 6.6  | 
 5.0  | 
| 
 Dunlop SP 40 A/S  | 
 6.2  | 
 4.2  | 
 3.4  | 
| 
 Bridgestone Insignia SE200  | 
 5.7  | 
 5.5  | 
 3.6  | 
| 
 Goodyear Integrity  | 
 5.7  | 
 5.4  | 
 2.9  | 
| 
 Dunlop SP20 FE  | 
 5.7  | 
 5.0  | 
 3.3  | 
using excel>data>data analysis>Regression
we have
| Simple Linear Regression Analysis | ||||||
| Regression Statistics | ||||||
| Multiple R | 0.9182 | |||||
| R Square | 0.8430 | |||||
| Adjusted R Square | 0.8332 | |||||
| Standard Error | 0.8411 | |||||
| Observations | 18 | |||||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
| Regression | 1 | 60.7866 | 60.7866 | 85.9295 | 0.0000 | |
| Residual | 16 | 11.3184 | 0.7074 | |||
| Total | 17 | 72.1050 | ||||
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
| Intercept | -7.5218 | 1.4668 | -5.1282 | 0.0001 | -10.6312 | -4.4124 | 
| Steering | 1.8151 | 0.1958 | 9.2698 | 0.0000 | 1.4000 | 2.2302 | 
a ) the estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the Buy Again rating given based on the Steering rating is
Buy Again = -7.5218+1.8151
since p-value of F stat is 0.0000 which is less than 0.05 so relationship between Buy again and steering rating is significant
b ) the estimated regression equation developed in part (a) provide a gives good fit to the data because about 84.30% variation in Buy again can be explained by steering rating .
uisng excel>data>data analysis>Regression
we have
| Regression Analysis | ||||||
| Regression Statistics | ||||||
| Multiple R | 0.9653 | |||||
| R Square | 0.9318 | |||||
| Adjusted R Square | 0.9227 | |||||
| Standard Error | 0.5727 | |||||
| Observations | 18 | |||||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||
| Regression | 2 | 67.1848 | 33.5924 | 102.4121 | 0.0000 | |
| Residual | 15 | 4.9202 | 0.3280 | |||
| Total | 17 | 72.1050 | ||||
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
| Intercept | -5.3877 | 1.1095 | -4.8558 | 0.0002 | -7.7526 | -3.0228 | 
| Steering | 0.6899 | 0.2875 | 2.3992 | 0.0299 | 0.0770 | 1.3028 | 
| Tread Wear | 0.9113 | 0.2063 | 4.4166 | 0.0005 | 0.4715 | 1.3511 | 
c ) an estimated regression equation that can be used to predict the Buy Again rating given the Steering rating and the Tread Wear rating is
Buy Again = -5.3877+0.6899*Steering + 0.9113 *Treadwear
d ) yes, the addition of the Tread Wear independent variable is significant because p-value of Treadwear is less than 0.05