Question

In: Economics

Consider a very simple representation of the before-trade Canadian and U.S. economies. Both countries produce only...

Consider a very simple representation of the before-trade Canadian and U.S. economies. Both countries produce only automobiles and food, according to the technology represented in the following production possibility frontiers: Assuming the working populations of Canada and the US is 25 and 250 respectively.

a. Use well-labelled diagrams, show that Canada can gain from trade with the US. Carefully describe what will happen to Canadian production, employment, and wages after free trade with the US. Be careful to state your assumptions.

b. Recognizing that the above model is a simplification of the real world, analyse the likely short- and long-run employment consequences of free trade with the US on Canadian employment and wages.

c. Within four years of implementation of the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in 1989, employment in Canadian manufacturing dropped by 400,000. This shows that the FTA killed jobs.” True or false? Explain.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The early results are in from the trade war the U.S. and Canada are waging against each other, and so far, it’s more or less a draw: each country is punching itself in the face with the same relative dunderheaded force.

Statistics Canada released a study looking at the duties Canada has applied on imports since 1988. It offers some of the first hard numbers on how much each country has collected in duties since trade hostilities broke out. To date, the Trudeau government has kept mum on that—when Finance Minister Bill Morneau appeared before the parliamentary committee on international trade earlier this week, he had rebuffed requests to disclose how much Ottawa had collected in duties, acknowledging only that the sum was significant.

Since the Trudeau government retaliated to the Trump administration’s hefty tariffs on steel and aluminum with its own sweeping set of duties on steel, aluminum and a sweep of other goods, Ottawa collected a combined $371 million in July and August, the most recent month included in the StatsCan analysis.

The agency also tallied up Washington’s haul after the U.S. dubbed Canada a national security threat: From June to August the U.S. collected a combined $713 million in duties

As a share of total imports, the punitive duties have had a similar impact in each country: Canada’s duties are equal to 0.8 per cent of the dollar value of goods imported from the U.S., while the corresponding ratio in the U.S. is 0.7 per cent.

Politicians like to pitch tariffs as a form of punishment against foreign nations—President Donald Trump claims he’s punishing Canada for “decades of abuse” while Prime Minister Justin Trudeau gets to claim his retaliatory tariffs are an eye-for-an-eye lesson against a bullying superpower.

The ones who really pay the price when a country slaps punitive tariffs on imports are its own citizens and companies, as higher duties get passed on to the end user consumer in the form of higher prices.

In other words, the collective $1.1 billion in duties collected by Washington and Ottawa are a massive tax on their own consumers.

The news will no doubt ramp up the pressure on the Trudeau government to funnel more of that money back to Canadian companies impacted by the trade war. Last month, reports shed some light on how much Ottawa was taking in, and funnelling out, by way of tariffs and relief payments. The Canada Border Services Agency had said it collected $286 million in July and August, but paid out just $11,184.35 under the duties relief program. A second assistance measure, the duty drawback program, had paid out nothing, while a third measure, a remission of surtaxes program, requires cabinet approval for each request. In his committee appearance this week, Morneau indicated 50 companies have been approved to date. A total of 135 had applied. It’s a murky process of picking winners and losers, something government is terrible at doing in the best of times.

Needless to say, this is a big backward step for consumers in both countries. From 1988, which marked Canada’s great leap forward in trade liberalization with the arrival of the initial Canada-U.S. free trade deal, until 2017, the tariffs trend had mostly gone in one direction—down. In 1988 Canada collected duties on U.S. imports equal to 2.6 per cent of the value of all American goods entering the country. After that deal and then NAFTA in 1994, the ratio of duties to imports fell to just 0.2 per cent in 2017.


Related Solutions

Consider a Ricardian world consisting of U.S. and Japan. Both countries produce and consume the same...
Consider a Ricardian world consisting of U.S. and Japan. Both countries produce and consume the same two goods: cars and computers. In U.S., it takes 400 hours of labor to make a car, and 100 hours of labor to make a computer. In Japan, it takes 400 hours of labor to make a car, and 200 hours of labor to make a computer. Each country has 2 billion hours of labor.             a. What would the autarky equilibrium (i.e., the...
Assume that there are only two countries in the world, Atlantica and Pacifica. Both countries produce...
Assume that there are only two countries in the world, Atlantica and Pacifica. Both countries produce and consume surfboards. The pre-trade equilibrium price of surfboards in Atlantica is $300 and the pre-trade price of surfboards in Pacifica is $400. a) Draw a three-graph diagram to depict the Pacifica, Atlantica, and international markets for surfboards. Assume that free trade opens up between Pacifica and Atlantica yielding an international price of $375 with 10,000 surfboards being traded. Be sure to label all...
Tariff effects: An overview Consider two hypothetical countries, Alagir and Ertil. Both countries produce iGadgets, and...
Tariff effects: An overview Consider two hypothetical countries, Alagir and Ertil. Both countries produce iGadgets, and the price of iGadgets is higher in Alagir than in Ertil. If Alagir and Ertil open to trade, producers in   would be more likely to lobby their government for an import tariff on iGadgets in order to protect themselves from foreign competition. Which of the following statements about the effects of the tariff compared to free trade are correct? Check all that apply. The...
4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce glops...
4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce glops of gloop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 30 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2020 and 2050. Year Hermes Physical...
Use the following for questions 3-4. Consider two countries, Australia and Trinidad. Both are island economies...
Use the following for questions 3-4. Consider two countries, Australia and Trinidad. Both are island economies endowed with major fishing resources and moderate climates. For simplicity, imagine that both countries have two industries: tourism and fishing. For the history of the country Australia has been open to free trade. Currently, Trinidad is closed to trade – there are no tourist visitors and no exported (or imported) fish. 3. The current market price and quantity of fish in Trinidad would be...
Trade barriers are used by developed and developing countries as a mechanism to protect their economies....
Trade barriers are used by developed and developing countries as a mechanism to protect their economies. Explain at least two types of trade barriers that apply to developed and developing countries? What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of trade barriers? Which of the barriers you mentioned are more effective for developing and developed countries and why? (100 words minimum)
Consider two countries, Green (Home) and Purple (Foreign), which produce butter and jam. There is only...
Consider two countries, Green (Home) and Purple (Foreign), which produce butter and jam. There is only one factor of production (labor). In order to produce a pound of butter, a Home worker needs 5 hours, while a Foreign worker needs 4 hours. In order to produce a pound of jam, a Home worker needs 4 hours, while a Foreign worker needs 3 hours. Markets are perfectly competitive. Labor endowments are equal across countries: L = L* = 3300 hours a)...
Consider a world with two countries, Home and Foreign, both able to produce two goods: cloth...
Consider a world with two countries, Home and Foreign, both able to produce two goods: cloth and tablet computers. The production of both goods uses capital and labor in fixed proportions, with the tablets industry using more capital per worker than the cloth industry. The units of each input needed to produce one unit output are given by: capital Labor Cloth 1 2 Tablets 2 1 Both countries have 150 units of capital available for production, but the Home country...
Why do economists pay more attention to national economies ( for example the U.S or Canadian...
Why do economists pay more attention to national economies ( for example the U.S or Canadian economies ) than the state or provincial economies( such as California or Ontario)
In what ways is the trade between countries increasing? Is trade good or bad for U.S.?...
In what ways is the trade between countries increasing? Is trade good or bad for U.S.? What is the alternative to trade? What kind of lifestyle will the US have if the alternative is adopted? Is it a viable alternative to trade? Be specific.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT