Question

In: Economics

Provide an example of a third party benefiting from a prisoner’s dilemma outcome while the game...

Provide an example of a third party benefiting from a prisoner’s dilemma outcome while the game participants are worse off relative to other possible outcomes. Also, explain the nature of the benefit.

How can a repeated game help in resolving a prisoner’s dilemma outcome?

Why is game theory important to economics?

Solutions

Expert Solution

ANS) -- The Prisoner's dilemma is a well known game theories.This theory gives a structure for knowing how we can make a balance in in between the coordination and competition and it also helps in the decision making.And this is having application in the fields like economics,philosophy ,biology and sociology.

-- One of the example of the prisoner's dilemma is that,for example 2 friends called Thomas and Joseph has done a offence and had cross questioned in different halls.Now the Thomas and Joseph want to reduce their jail sentence,so now these two friends are going through the same situation.

-- The Prisoner's dilemma is also a very good sample of logical reasoning and decision included in the game theory.This is the condition in which 2 people are needed to make decisions individually and that will make problems individually and problems in between them.In such a situation the people challenge a dilemma regarding their conclusion,because at the time when motivated completely by own interest,but at that time they go through more problems than motivated through a team interest.

-- So what actually helps to understand how contestants are giving the response to contrasting model of play and this will disclose how that contestants will be assumed to act in the time ahead.

** The repeated game means it is one of the large form of game which contain many repetition of little level game or stage game and this game is a game in which 2 person play.Through this game a player will understand that their present action will affect their future.The repeated dilemma games ,it has been discovered that the priority strategy is not for playing a Nash strategy of the base game,anyway it for the cooperation and play a socially perfect strategy.

** Game Theory made a excellent growth in the economic theory.This has made a good solutions to many, of the issues regarded with , a condition in which 2 suppliers are dominated at the market for a commodity, a market is shared by a little number of sellers.In these fields it was very difficult to make solution because of the interest which makes clash between the individuals and company or firm.

** This theory has also made balance solutions in the rational reaction of the mart members.Nash equilibrium is one of the main topic in the game theory which means a stable condition in the game in which the player cannot change his game plan,assuming the another player also do not change the game plan.So we can say that this kind of Nash equilibrium can make a solution in the games were both the players are not cooperating.

THANKS.......


Related Solutions

the prisoner’s dilemma, coordination and assurance games, the battle of the sexes and the chicken game....
the prisoner’s dilemma, coordination and assurance games, the battle of the sexes and the chicken game. Describe and briefly discuss an application of one of these games. The application can relate to situations from your own direct experience or describe an example from economics, politics, or some other field.
For each statement indicate whether it is True or False? Explain. a) The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game...
For each statement indicate whether it is True or False? Explain. a) The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game has a second-mover advantage in its order of play. b) The Battle of the Sexes Game is not Pareto-optimal. c) A Nash equilibrium gives each player their highest payoff in the game. d) In the James Dean Game each player follows their dominant strategy.
Consider a repeated prisoner’s dilemma game that will be repeated for one million rounds. 1. If...
Consider a repeated prisoner’s dilemma game that will be repeated for one million rounds. 1. If this game is played by immortal rational utility maximizers, what is the Nash equilibrium for this repeated game? 2. If this game was played as an experiment using human players, would you expect to see this strategy? 3. If this game was played as an experiment with rational utility maximizers who have a maximum lifespan of 500,000 rounds, what is the Nash equilibrium for...
3. a) We know that the single shot prisoner’s dilemma game result in a dominant Nash...
3. a) We know that the single shot prisoner’s dilemma game result in a dominant Nash equilibrium strategy that is Pareto inefficient. Suppose we let the two prisoners talk before the start of the game. Would that change the final outcome of the game? Justify your answer. b) With a two player, 2 outcome example, explain how a sequential game might have different outcomes depending on when it ends.
a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy...
a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy in this game? b) Create an example of a pay-off matrix for such a game c) Will the Nash equilibrium of this game result in the socially optimal outcome? Explain why/why not.
In a short written analysis (around 100 words), compare and contrast Ostrom’s original Prisoner’s Dilemma game...
In a short written analysis (around 100 words), compare and contrast Ostrom’s original Prisoner’s Dilemma game with her Leviathan game. What is the main change that occurs in the move to the Leviathan game? Why – what role/benefit does Leviathan bring to the situation? What are some pros and cons that come with implementing Leviathan? What are alternative ways (i.e. institutions) that Ostrom suggests may achieve similar benefits? Focus on the institutions that she is modeling, not on the game...
Below is an example of a classic prisoners’ dilemma game. In Westeros (see Game of Thrones)...
Below is an example of a classic prisoners’ dilemma game. In Westeros (see Game of Thrones) the dead are coming with winter. Which outcome has the best overall consequences and the best chance of surviving for Cersei and Daenerys? Cersei fights (cooperates) Cersei runs (defects) Daenerys fights (cooperates) Each has 70% chance of surviving and 30% chance of being slaughtered Cersei has 10% chance of being slaughtered, 90% chance of escaping Daenerys is completely screwed and has 95% chance of...
Explain the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Give a numerical example and show how each player would make decisions.
Explain the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Give a numerical example and show how each player would make decisions.
6. While prisoner’s dilemma outcomes may produce worse results for competing companies than other alternate outcomes,...
6. While prisoner’s dilemma outcomes may produce worse results for competing companies than other alternate outcomes, such dilemmas can benefit: A. third parties who do business with the competing companies. B. the stockholders of the competing companies. C. third parties who do not transact business with the competing companies. D. the employees of the competing companies. 7. Some prisoner’s dilemma outcomes can be resolved when the players engage in: A. repeated games. B. competitive behavior. C. one-time games. D. irrational...
Provide an example of a strictly competitive game that is not a zero-sum game.
Provide an example of a strictly competitive game that is not a zero-sum game.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT