In: Economics
Can you provide some examples of signalling and screening in adverse selection
Adverse selection refers generally to a situation in which sellers have information that buyers do not have, or vice versa, about some aspect of product quality - in other words, it is a case where asymmetric information is exploited. Asymmetric information, also called information failure, happens when one party to a transaction has greater material knowledge than the other party. Typically, the more knowledgeable party is the seller. Symmetric information is when both parties have equal knowledge.
Screening in economics refers to a strategy of combating adverse selection, one of the potential decision-making complications in cases of asymmetric information, by the agent(s) with less information. The concept of screening was first developed by Michael Spence and should be distinguished from signalling, a strategy of combating adverse selection undertaken by the agent with more information. Contractual arrangements originating from uniformed side of market to elicit information from informed market participants. Buyers must find ways to screen out erroneous information but allow in truthful information. These problems do not exist in markets in which products are simple and easily evaluated.
In contract theory, signalling is the idea that one party credibly conveys some information about itself to another party (the principal). Signaling can least to wasteful resource allocation and the market outcome may thus be inefficient. Signaling is an action by a party with good information that is confined to situations of asymmetric information. Screening, which is an attempt to filter helpful from useless information, is an action by those with poor information.
Examples of Screening in adverse selection:
Examples of Signalling: