Question

In: Chemistry

The Hohenberg-Kohn theorems show a one-to-one mapping between the density and the molecular Hamiltonian. What information...

The Hohenberg-Kohn theorems show a one-to-one mapping between the density and the molecular Hamiltonian. What information is contained in the Hamiltonian and, conceptually, how can this information be extracted from the density?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems

The Hohenberg-Kohn theorems relate to any system consisting of electrons moving under the influence of an external potential . Stated simply they are as follows:

Theorem 1.
The external potential , and hence the total energy, is a unique functional of the electron density .

The energy functional alluded to in the first Hohenberg-Kohn theorem can be written in terms of the external potential in the following way,

(1.28)

where is an unknown, but otherwise universal functional of the electron density only. Correspondingly, a Hamiltonian for the system can be written such that the electron wavefunction that minimises the expectation value gives the groundstate energy (1.30) (assuming a non-degenerate groundstate),

(1.29)

The Hamiltonian can be written as,

(1.30)

where is the electronic Hamiltonian consisting of a kinetic energy operator and an interaction operator ,

(1.31)

The electron operator is the same for all -electron systems, so is completely defined by the number of electrons , and the external potential .

The proof of the first theorem is remarkably simple and proceeds by reductio ad absurdum. Let there be two different external potentials, and , that give rise to the same density . The associated Hamiltonians, and , will therefore have different groundstate wavefunctions, and , that each yield . Using the variational principle [19], together with (1.31) yields,

(1.32)
(1.33)

where and are the groundstate energies of and respectively. It is at this point that the Hohenberg-Kohn theorems, and therefore DFT, apply rigorously to the groundstate only. An equivalent expression for (1.34) holds when the subscripts are interchanged. Therefore adding the interchanged inequality to (1.35) leads to the result:

(1.34)

which is a contradiction, and as a result the groundstate density uniquely determines the external potential , to within an additive constant. Stated simply, the electrons determine the positions of the nuclei in a system, and also all groundstate electronic properties, because as mentioned earlier, and completely define .

Theorem 2.
The groundstate energy can be obtained variationally: the density that minimises the total energy is the exact groundstate density.

The proof of the second theorem is also straightforward: as just shown, determines , and determine and therefore . This ultimately means is a functional of , and so the expectation value of is also a functional of , i.e.

(1.35)

A density that is the ground-state of some external potential is known as -representable. Following from this, a -representable energy functional can be defined in which the external potential is unrelated to another density ,

(1.36)

and the variational principle asserts,

(1.37)

where is the wavefunction associated with the correct groundstate . This leads to,

(1.38)

and so the variational principle of the second Hohenberg-Kohn theorem is obtained,

(1.39)

Related Solutions

Write down a generic molecular Hamiltonian (or, if you want a concrete example, the one for...
Write down a generic molecular Hamiltonian (or, if you want a concrete example, the one for H2). Then using words and equations, show precisely what steps and approximations are made to ultimately come up with the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian for vibration and the rigid rotator Hamiltonian for rotation of the molecule.
Show that to lowest order in correction terms the relativistic (but noncavariant) Hamiltonian for the one-dimensional...
Show that to lowest order in correction terms the relativistic (but noncavariant) Hamiltonian for the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator has the form H = (1/2m)(p^2 + m^2 w^2 q^2) - (1/8)(p^4/m^3 c^2) and use first order perturbation theory to calculate the lowest-order relativistic correction to the frequency of the harmonic oscillator. Express your result as a fractional change in frequency.
Question Background information: - The molecular weight of ethanol (C2H5OH) is 46.1 and the density of...
Question Background information: - The molecular weight of ethanol (C2H5OH) is 46.1 and the density of absolute (100%) ethanol = 0.79 g/mL. - Assume that a 80 kg person contains 48 L of ‘water’. Ignore the metabolism, and assume the water content of the person remains constant. - The legal limit for a driver’s blood alcohol in Australia is 50 mg of ethanol per 100 mL of blood (referred to as a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.05%). a.) During...
What is the difference between density-dependent and density-independent factors
What is the difference between density-dependent and density-independent factors
what is “Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping technology , and what is its use in business...
what is “Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping technology , and what is its use in business management?
What is the difference between molecular motion and diffusion?
What is the difference between molecular motion and diffusion?
The molecular weight of ethanol (CHgCHzOH) is 46 and its density is 0.789 g/cm3. A. What...
The molecular weight of ethanol (CHgCHzOH) is 46 and its density is 0.789 g/cm3. A. What is the molarity of ethanol in beer that is 5% ethanol by volume? [Alcohol content of beer varies from about 4Vo (lite beer) to B% (stout beer). B. The legal limit for a driver's blood alcohol content varies, but 80 mg of ethanol per 100 mL of blood (usually referred to as a blood alcohol level of 0.08) is typical. What is the molarity...
What is the relation between path integral methods for dealing with constraints (constrained Hamiltonian dynamics involving...
What is the relation between path integral methods for dealing with constraints (constrained Hamiltonian dynamics involving non-singular Lagrangian) and Dirac's method of dealing with such systems (which involves the Dirac bracket)? And what is the advantage/relative significance of each method?
What is the difference between semiclassical probability density and classical probability density? Note: This is for...
What is the difference between semiclassical probability density and classical probability density? Note: This is for a quantum physics 2 course.
Differentiate between implementing a value-added strategy and mapping it for sustainability. From the e-Activity, provide one...
Differentiate between implementing a value-added strategy and mapping it for sustainability. From the e-Activity, provide one example of a strategy and one environmental factor that management for this organization should consider when mapping the organization for sustainability.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT