Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A personal computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly...

A personal computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting a random sample of 10 workers and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in Table 1.

Worker

Process 1

Process 2

Difference

(Process 1 - Process 2)

1

32

20

12

2

82

46

36

3

42

24

18

4

65

57

8

5

45

49

-4

6

32

14

18

7

63

60

3

8

48

17

31

9

53

56

-3

10

85

76

9

Table 1

Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.10 level of significance, that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μd (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed.

Perform a two-tailed test. Then fill in the table below. Carry your intermediate computations to at least three decimal places and round your answers as specified in the table. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.)

The null hypothesis:

H0

:

The alternative hypothesis:

H1

:

The type of test statistic:

(Choose one)ZtChi squareF

The value of the test statistic:

(Round to at least three decimal places.)

The two critical values at the

0.10

level of significance:

(Round to at least three decimal places.)

and

At the 0.10 level, can the company conclude that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ?

Yes

No

Solutions

Expert Solution

null Hypothesis:μd = 0
alternate Hypothesis: μd 0

The type of test statistic: t

3)

total = Σd=128
mean dbar= d̅                           = 12.80
degree of freedom =n-1                            = 9.000
Std deviaiton SD=√(Σd2-(Σd)2/n)/(n-1) = 13.290
std error=Se=SD/√n= 4.203
              value of    test statistic            =     (d̅-μd)/Se         = 3.046

The two critical values at the 0.1 level =-1.833 and 1.833

4)

At the 0.10 level, can the company conclude that the mean assembly times for the two processes differ "Yes

degree of freedom =9


Related Solutions

1 A researcher was interested in comparing the response times of two different cab companies. Companies...
1 A researcher was interested in comparing the response times of two different cab companies. Companies A and B were each called at n = 20 randomly selected times. The calls to company A were made independently of the calls to company B. The response times were recorded and the summary statistics were as follows: Company A Company B Mean response time 12.3 mins 15.0 mins Standard deviation 1.5 mins 1.7 mins Find the margin of error, E, for a...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard (Genessey v. Digital Equipment Corporation). The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the...
A woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by...
A woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard. The injury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within two standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the 27 cases. The 27 awards were (in...
A woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by...
A woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard. The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the 27 cases. The 27 award amounts (in...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard (Genessey v. Digital Equipment Corporation). The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard (Genessey v. Digital Equipment Corporation). The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard (Genessey v. Digital Equipment Corporation). The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were...
In 1997 a woman sued a computer keyboard manufacturer, charging that her repetitive stress injuries were caused by the keyboard (Genessey v. Digital Equipment Corporation). The jury awarded about $3.5 million for pain and suffering, but the court then set aside that award as being unreasonable compensation. In making this determination, the court identified a "normative" group of 27 similar cases and specified a reasonable award as one within 2 standard deviations of the mean of the awards in the...
Write an Assembly code to input two integer numbers from keyboard, computes the division of two...
Write an Assembly code to input two integer numbers from keyboard, computes the division of two numbers WITHOUT using division operator and print out the reminder and quotient to the screen. Note: program using “division operator” will earn no credit for this task. You are ALLOWED to use the “print” and “read” macro
Mango Plc. is a computer and personal electronics manufacturer. It is an all equity firm, it...
Mango Plc. is a computer and personal electronics manufacturer. It is an all equity firm, it has 1 billion shares outstanding, each priced at $300, and has an equity beta of 1.5. Assume that the risk-free rate is 2%, the market risk-premium is 5%, the CAPM holds, and the marginal tax rate is 30%. a) Considering investing in new project with $10 billion initial investment and annual, unlevered free cash-flows of $2 billion for the next 25 years (starting a...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT