Question

In: Finance

(a) A stock’s returns for the past 3 years are 10%, -15%, and 35%. What is...

  1. (a) A stock’s returns for the past 3 years are 10%, -15%, and 35%. What is the historical Average return? What is the historical sample standard deviation?

(b). What is the Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH)?

(c). i. Suppose you observed that High-Level managers make superior returns on investments in the company’s stock, would this be a violation of weak-form Market Efficiency? Would it be a violation of strong-form Market Efficiency?

  1. If the weak-form of the efficient market Hypothesis is valid, must the strong-form also hold? Conversely, does strong-form efficiency imply weak-form efficiency?

(d). Which of the following statements are True if the Efficient Market Hypothesis holds?

  1. It implies that future events can be forecast with prefect accuracy
  2. It implies that prices reflect all available information.
  3. It implies that security prices change for no discernible reason.
  1. It implies that prices do not fluctuate.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. Historical average return:

Historical sample standard deviation:

Here, there are 3 data points: 10%, -15%, 35%

Variance

= 20.3%

b) Efficient Markets Hypothesis theory states that asset prices fully reflect all available information. Thus, it is impossible to beat the market consistently on a risk-adjusted basis since market prices should only react to new information. This theory was developed by Eugene Fama.

c) i) Under the weak- form market efficiency, share prices reflect the publicly available information. However, high-level managers may have access to hidden /insider information which may enable the managers to have a better idea about company's future earnings/ prospects. Thus, high-level managers getting a higher return on investment is not a violation of weak-form market efficiency but of strong-form market efficiency.

ii) If the weak-form of the efficient market hypothesis is valid, strong-form doesn't need to hold. Market prices may not be factoring in the hidden information.

However, the converse is true i.e. strong-form implies weak-form efficiency. If market prices reflect even the hidden information, they do factor in publicly available information.

d) Under the efficient market hypothesis, prices reflect all available information. Thus ii) is true.


Related Solutions

During the past 10 years, the percent returns on two mutual funds (aggressive and passive) expressed...
During the past 10 years, the percent returns on two mutual funds (aggressive and passive) expressed in percentages were as follows: Year Aggressive Fund Passive Fund -10 0% 3% -9 6% 4% -8 0% 4% -7 3% 2% -6 8% 3% -5 0% 3% -4 5% 4% -3 1% 2% -2 1% 4% Last Year 4% 4% Note that this is a sample of returns. a) Compute the expected return for the two funds. Round your answers to two decimal...
During the past 10 years, the percent returns on two mutual funds (aggressive and passive) expressed...
During the past 10 years, the percent returns on two mutual funds (aggressive and passive) expressed in percentages were as follows: Year Aggressive Fund Passive Fund -10 1% 3% -9 8% 2% -8 1% 3% -7 2% 3% -6 6% 4% -5 2% 2% -4 6% 4% -3 1% 2% -2 2% 2% Last Year 4% 3% Note that this is a sample of returns. a) Compute the expected return for the two funds. Round your answers to two decimal...
A portfolio generates the following returns over the past 10 years: Year Return (%) 1 -7...
A portfolio generates the following returns over the past 10 years: Year Return (%) 1 -7 2 -15 3 20 4 21 5 9 6 -6 7 15 8 23 9 2 10 -5 Calculate the test statistic to test whether the standard deviation of this portfolio's return is different from the benchmark portfolio standard deviation of 22. Enter answer accurate to 3 decimal places. Bonus thinking question: can you reject the hypothesis that the two standard deviations are equal?...
A portfolio generates the following returns over the past 10 years: Year Return (%) 1 14...
A portfolio generates the following returns over the past 10 years: Year Return (%) 1 14 2 2 3 -15 4 20 5 18 6 16 7 -17 8 24 9 -10 10 -4 Calculate the test statistic to test whether the standard deviation of this portfolio's return is different from the benchmark portfolio standard deviation of 23. The answer should be 4.075. Please use Excel and show formulas that are used. Thank you!
. Over the past five years, a stock produced returns of 10 percent, 18 percent, 2...
. Over the past five years, a stock produced returns of 10 percent, 18 percent, 2 percent, -9 percent, and 4 percent. a) What is the geometric return? b) What is the arithmetic return? c) What is the variance of the above returns? d) What is the sample standard deviation?
A stock had returns of 18.58%, 1.34%, and 20.81% for the past three years. What is...
A stock had returns of 18.58%, 1.34%, and 20.81% for the past three years. What is the variance of returns? Answer with a decimal to the 4th place. Please show work on paper, dont use excel
A stock had returns of 18.58%, -5.58%, and 20.81% for the past three years. What is...
A stock had returns of 18.58%, -5.58%, and 20.81% for the past three years. What is the variance of returns? Enter as a decimal, rounding to 4th decimal place. (E.g., 0.0357)
Given the following past returns for a stock: 2013                + 15 % 2014                + 18 %...
Given the following past returns for a stock: 2013                + 15 % 2014                + 18 % 2015                + 30 % 2016                - 20 % 2017                + 10 % Together, this stock’s expected return and stand alone risk measure mean: a. there is a roughly 70% chance the actual return will be between - 8.02% and + 29.22% b. there is a roughly 70% chance the actual return will be between + 8.02% and + 29.22% c. there is a roughly...
Over the past 10-15 years or so, we've seen a rapid consolidation of banks with some...
Over the past 10-15 years or so, we've seen a rapid consolidation of banks with some of the largest institutions acquiring smaller local and regional banks. We've also seen some significantly larger banks (e.g. Countrywide, Wachovia, and National City) acquired as well. At the same time, we've seen a lot of new, smaller "small business and retail depositor friendly" banks being created. What has driven this and what does it portend for banking?
Based on the historical returns shown below, what is the stock’s expected return for 2017? Year...
Based on the historical returns shown below, what is the stock’s expected return for 2017? Year Return 2014 17% 2015 -12% 2016 25% Question 1 options: A) 9.4% B) 9.6% C) 9.8% D) 10.0% E) 10.2%
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT