In: Finance
We are considering ‘Federal Reserve’ or the ‘Fed’, the Central Bank of United States of America (U.S.A.), established by the Congress on December 23, 1913 under the Federal Reserve Act – providing the country with a safer, stable and more flexible financial and monetary system.
The Pros coming from The Fed would include:
- It regulates and supervises banks and other major
financial institutions in the U.S. to ensure soundness of the
financial system and protect consumers’ credit rights in the
country.
- It prevents frauds and financial crimes by keeping a
check and monitoring the operations of financial Institutions
within the country. It maintains the financial system stability and
contains systemic risk that may arise in the financial
markets.
- It functions by conducting the country’s monetary
policy by influencing credit and money conditions in the economy to
ensure full employment and stable prices.
- Its monetary policy increase predictability and
transparency, helping the Central Bank with explaining its actions
to the public and helping the market to predict the future course
under normal financial and political conditions.
- Establishment of the national currency; it made a
single currency valid throughout the country, helping the economy
to run smoothly.
The Cons coming from The Fed would include:
- It is often regarded as anti-capitalism, as finances
are controlled by a huge government organization, instead of a
group of private businesses.
- It’s speculated that the government would simply
decide to print as many US dollars as it wants and then pay off all
debts of the government. However, under the Fed system, this is not
allowed.
- Favoring private interests over public interests and
other lobbying groups having great influence over the Federal
Reserve, allowing individuals to benefit rather than the whole
society and taking away the well-being and rights of the
public.
- Manipulating the US economy by setting national
interest rates at will.
The argument is still debatable that there should be a single Global Central Bank. Provided the national financial reforms and regulations are a result of research and work done financial and economic professionals and institutions under each and every sector within the overall Industry, and to a holistic approach towards the finances and related regulations, it would not be fair to say there should a single Global Central Bank operating within the country.
“Too Big to Fail” would have been still a WallStreet chant among the financial and non financial ending institutions if there wouldn’t have been Dodd-Frank Act and Volcker Rule, implemented within the financial system under Obama Administration.
The concept overall didn’t take into account the public interests in the form of leverage the big financial institutions carried due to unsecured Debt lent to these institutions. Investment banks started doing ‘proprietary trading’ freely, played on the Public money for their own interest.
Lehman Brothers’ and AIG’s failure was mainly due to trading of
sub-prime unsecured loans (which were apparently collateral or
mortgage backed assets), but were traded and underwritten by Lehman
Brothers to the extend till they were defaulted and there were no
actual assets to be claimed and liquidated for recovery purpose,
all other Investment Banks earned a huge chunk out of the sub
lending activity, underwritten by AIG and Lehman Brothers.
It wouldn’t be fair to say that AIG and Lehman Brothers should have
been rescued by Fed or the central bank, as this collapse set an
example and established the standard and regulation which is Basel
I, II, III norms prompting the Investment Banks to maintain enough
liquidity and assets to pay off the interests to the Public upon
difficult times in the financial system.