In: Accounting
Profits have been decreasing for several years at Pegasus Airlines. In an effort to improve the company’s performance, the company is thinking about dropping several flights that appear to be unprofitable. An income statement for one round-trip of one such flight (flight 482) is as follows:
Ticket revenue (175 seats × 40% occupancy × $200 ticket price) $14,000 100.0%
Variable expenses ($15 per person) 1,050 7.5
Contribution margin 12,950 92.5%
Flight expenses: Salaries, flight crew $ 1,800
Flight promotion 750
Depreciation of aircraft 1,550
Fuel for aircraft 5,800
Liability insurance 4,200
Salaries, flight assistants 1,500
Baggage loading and flight preparation 1,700
Overnight costs for flight crew and assistants at destination 300
Total flight expenses 17,600
Net operating loss $(4,650) The following additional information is available about flight 482:
a. Members of the flight crew are paid fixed annual salaries, whereas the flight assistants are paid based on the number of round trips they complete.
b. One-third of the liability insurance is a special charge assessed against flight 482 because in the opinion of the insurance company, the destination of the flight is in a “high-risk” area. The remaining two-thirds would be unaffected by a decision to drop flight 482.
c. The baggage loading and flight preparation expense is an allocation of ground crews’ salaries and depreciation of ground equipment. Dropping flight 482 would have no effect on the company’s total baggage loading and flight preparation expenses.
d. If flight 482 is dropped, Pegasus Airlines has no authorization at present to replace it with another flight.
e. Aircraft depreciation is due entirely to obsolescence. Depreciation due to wear and tear is negligible.
f. Dropping flight 482 would not allow Pegasus Airlines to reduce the number of aircraft in its fleet or the number of flight crew on its payroll.
Questions
1. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) in dollars of discontinuing flight 482? Please provide details for your conclusion.
2. What costs are not relevant to your decision? Explain why.
3. The airline’s scheduling officer has been criticized because only about 50% of the seats on Pegasus’ flights are being filled compared to an industry average of 60%. The scheduling officer has explained that Pegasus’ average seat occupancy could be improved considerably by eliminating about 10% of its flights, but that doing so would reduce profits. Explain how this could happen.
1 | Financial advantage (disadvantage): | ||||||||
$ | $ | ||||||||
Contribution lost due to elimination of flight 482 | -12950 | ||||||||
Add: | |||||||||
Flight promotion | 750 | ||||||||
Fuel for aircraft | 5800 | ||||||||
Liability insurance | (4200*1/3) | 1400 | |||||||
Salaries,Flight assistants | 1500 | ||||||||
Overnight costs for flight crew and assistants at destination | 300 | 9750 | |||||||
Financial advantage (disadvantage) | -3200 | ||||||||
Flight 482 should not be dropped since it results in a financial disadvantage of $ 3200 | |||||||||
2 | Costs not relevant to decision: | ||||||||
Cost | Why? | ||||||||
Salaries,flight crew | Fixed cost and will continue | ||||||||
Depreciation of aircraft | Sunk cost | ||||||||
Liability insurance (Two-third) | This part of the insurance is common to the Airline | ||||||||
Baggage,loading and flight preparation | Allocated cost and will continue | ||||||||
3 | Eliminate flights with very low occupancy. | ||||||||
It may encourage passengers to choose other available flights of the airline. | |||||||||
It will increase the occupancy of remaining flights | |||||||||
I appreciate your ratings |