Question

In: Economics

Consider the example below, how would you account for the revenue from a contract for HMM11...

Consider the example below, how would you account for the revenue from a contract for HMM11 products? How would you account for the revenue from a contract for HMM12 products?

Early in the redesign of HMM12, Bills recognized that the decision for HBP to host the software would affect how revenues were recognized from sales of the new product. For HMM11, the client hosted the software on its servers and was responsible for all maintenance and operating costs. Although HBP offered to fix any software bugs, there was no contractual obligation to provide updates/point releases. As a result, the full value of any multi-year licensing contracts was recognized as revenue when the software was delivered.

If the client chose to have HMM11 software hosted on HBP’s server, the contract specified that the client would pay HBP an upfront licensing fee and a separate hosting fee (equivalent to about 10% of the licensing fee) at the time the contract was signed. In the majority of contracts, the client paid a nonrefundable licensing fee. Some clients negotiated a Termination for Convenience (TFC) clause. Since the underlying product was not updated and clients had the option of hosting the software on their systems or on HBP systems (incurring a separate hosting fee), HBP recorded the full value of the licensing fees as revenue at the beginning of the contract period. In contrast, hosting fees were recorded as deferred revenues and recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the contract (terms were 1, 2, or 3 years).

The new business model for HMM12 eliminated the option for clients to host HMM software and introduced an ongoing obligation for HBP. Clients would continue to pay an upfront licensing fee, but since only HBP could host the software there was no separate hosting fee. The license fee gave the client access to the software, the hosting, and any future improvement releases over the contract period. Accordingly, the contract was analogous to a subscription, rather than an outright sale.

For accounting purposes, HBP was required to record the upfront license fee as deferred revenue on its balance sheet. At the end of each accounting period, it would recognize a portion of the deferred revenue as earned revenue in the income statement. For example, if a client paid $360,000 for a 3-year (i.e., 36-month) license period, at the time of the contract HBP would record the $360,000 as deferred revenue (a liability) and cash (an asset) on the balance sheet. At the end of the first quarter (i.e., 3- months), HBP would recognize $30,000 (i.e., $360,000 divided by 36 months times 3 months) as earned revenue with a corresponding $30,000 subtracted from the deferred revenue liability.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The contract for HMM11 maybe the following

HBP was required to record the upfront license fee as deferred revenue on its balance sheet. At the end of each accounting period, it would recognize a portion of the deferred revenue as earned revenue in the income statement. For example, if a client paid $360,000 for a 3-year (i.e., 36-month) license period, at the time of the contract HBP would record the $360,000 as deferred revenue (a liability) and cash (an asset) on the balance sheet. At the end of the first quarter (i.e., 3- months), HBP would recognize $30,000 (i.e., $360,000 divided by 36 months times 3 months) as earned revenue with a corresponding $30,000 subtracted from the deferred revenue liability.

If the client chose to have HMM11 software hosted on HBP’s server, the contract specified that the client would pay HBP an upfront licensing fee and a separate hosting fee (equivalent to about 10% of the licensing fee) at the time the contract was signed. In the majority of contracts, the client paid a nonrefundable licensing fee. Some clients negotiated a Termination for Convenience (TFC) clause. Since the underlying product was not updated and clients had the option of hosting the software on their systems or on HBP systems (incurring a separate hosting fee), HBP recorded the full value of the licensing fees as revenue at the beginning of the contract period. In contrast, hosting fees were recorded as deferred revenues and recognized as revenue ratably over the life of the contract (terms were 1, 2, or 3 years).

The new business model for HMM12 eliminated the option for clients to host HMM software and introduced an ongoing obligation for HBP. Clients would continue to pay an upfront licensing fee, but since only HBP could host the software there was no separate hosting fee. The license fee gave the client access to the software, the hosting, and any future improvement releases over the contract period. Accordingly, the contract was analogous to a subscription, rather than an outright sale and less the revenue in BMM11.


Related Solutions

demonstrate with example how you would apply control process to ensure that revenue goals is achieved
demonstrate with example how you would apply control process to ensure that revenue goals is achieved
In a bank​ reconciliation, interest revenue earned on a chequing account would be deducted from the...
In a bank​ reconciliation, interest revenue earned on a chequing account would be deducted from the book balance. true or false
How would you use a forward contract, futures contract, and a call option contract on the...
How would you use a forward contract, futures contract, and a call option contract on the US $ / Australian $ FX rate to hedge the FX risk of paying a $A1 million bill in Australian Dollars for a purchase to be delivered and paid in 90 days? What are the pro and cons of using each FX derivative in general?     
How would you use a forward contract, futures contract, and a call option contract on the...
How would you use a forward contract, futures contract, and a call option contract on the US $ / Australian $ FX rate to hedge the FX risk of paying a $A1 million bill in Australian Dollars for a purchase to be delivered and paid in 90 days? What are the pro and cons of using each FX derivative in general?
How would you interpret the below financials? Income Statement - Quarter 3       Gross Revenue...
How would you interpret the below financials? Income Statement - Quarter 3       Gross Revenue    3,182,084 100.0% - Commissions       285,359    9.0% - Refunds       187,743    5.9% + Interest Income                  -      0.0% Net Revenue       2,708,982 85.1%       Flight Operations       646,112    20.3% Fuel       573,887    18.0% Maintenance       565,530    17.8% Passenger Service       443,330    13.9% Cabin/Food Service         45,478    1.4% Insurance         66,000    2.1% Marketing...
How would you interpret the below financials? Income Statement - Quarter 4       Gross Revenue...
How would you interpret the below financials? Income Statement - Quarter 4       Gross Revenue    3,149,864    100.0% - Commissions       282,397    9.0% - Refunds       239,389    7.6% + Interest Income                  -      0.0% Net Revenue       2,628,078 83.4%       Flight Operations       641,849    20.4% Fuel       593,729    18.8% Maintenance       561,836    17.8% Passenger Service       430,489    13.7% Cabin/Food Service         38,562    1.2% Insurance         66,000    2.1%...
Accounting for Revenue I Example MFRS 15 (Manufacturing & Contract Modifications)
Case 2: Manufacturing & Contract Modifications Dell Computer, computer manufacturer, enters into contract with UPM to deliver 300 computers for total price of RM600,000 (RM2,000 per computer). Due to necessary preparation works, UPM agrees to deliver computers in 3 separate deliveries during the forthcoming 3 months (100 computers in each delivery). UPM takes control over the computers at delivery. After the first delivery is made, UPM and Dell Computer amend the contract. Dell Computer  will supply 200 additional computers (500 in total). How should Dell...
What are the basic differences between the revenue realization principle and revenue from the contract with...
What are the basic differences between the revenue realization principle and revenue from the contract with customers (ASC 606)? Do you think ASC 606 is better than the realization principle? Why? Give your reasons.
Provide an example of a pair of products that you would consider to have a positive...
Provide an example of a pair of products that you would consider to have a positive cross price elasticity. Provide another example of a pair of products you would expect to be negative. Is there a scenario where someone else might view them in the opposite way?
Provide an example of how a business you know (large or small) would have benefited from...
Provide an example of how a business you know (large or small) would have benefited from a better knowledge of probability.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT