In: Physics
When consulting manuals, electricians, online sources, etc., they always instruct you to handle halogen light bulbs with gloves.
The "explanation" that usually accompanies this statement is that oils and salts from a bare hand can "react" with the surrounding glass/quartz, owing to the fact that halogen bulbs are much hotter than ordinary ones. These reactions would cause weak spots in the quartz (or in some versions of the story, the filament), decreasing the lifetime of the bulb.
Is there any merit to this explanation? What are then the precise mechanisms involved in the bulb's degradation when the bulb is touched by a dirty monkey finger?
The interesting point in halogen bulbs is that they managge to
not, over time, cover the inside of the bulb glass with condensed
vapour of the filament (1).
Therefore, the bulb can be smaller, as it's not needed to spread
that metal over a large area.
Now, when touching the bulb, a fingerprint is left, which
contains various carbon compounds. When switching on the bulb, it
carbonizes, leaving slight dark residues (2). Even if they are
barely visible, they cover a significant fraction of the surface
area, and make that area somewhat less translucent. That causes a
reduction of light output over the livetime of the bulb,
adding up to a significant loss in overall efficiency of the
halogen bulb.
On the alternative explanations:
The idea that somehow temperature differences are created, and
cause a problem by weakening mechanical stability makes no sense -
the kind of glass a halogen bulb is made of, quarz glas, is very
stable under heat differences, as it changed it's volume only very
little, compared to other glass.
(1) Instead, that vapour reacts with the halogen, to a compound that will subsequently split again into metal and halogen on the surface of the filament.
(2) I assume these carbon residues are long-lasting or permanent because the bulb surface is not hot enough to just burn them off.