Question

In: Operations Management

Summary: CASE REVIEW ON COMMERCIAL COMPANIES A commercial company is a legal entity established under a...

Summary: CASE REVIEW ON COMMERCIAL COMPANIES A commercial company is a legal entity established under a contract by two or more persons each of whom undertakes to participate in an enterprise for profit, by contributing a share of the capital in the form of tangible or intangible property, services or labour, with a view to sharing any profit or loss resulting from the enterprise. Mr. Ahmed, Abdulrahman and Abdullah are Omani citizens, friends and graduate of MCBS. They are from royal families and they love playing computer game, soccer and golf. They joined the college in 1999 and graduated in 2002. After their graduation they travelled to the United Kingdom for greener pasture. Ahmed is married with three children, Abdulrahman with four children and Abdullah with six children. While in the UK, they support Manchester United Football Club and they always watch all their games. In 2010, they decided to come back home and start a company. After some preliminary discussion, they decided to register a Company Limited by shares with a share capital of one million Omani Riyal. In their contract, they were so confident that based on their experience and exposure, they are certainly going to make profit. They therefore agreed on a profit-sharing formula of fifty percent for Ahmed, thirty percent for Abdulrahman and twenty percent for Abdullah. Unfortunately, the business did not go as planned and they made huge loses of ten million Omani Riyal. Abdulrahman being the eldest has informed others that since he has four children and he is paying tuition for them in a private secondary school which is very expensive and couple with the fact that his wife is pregnant with set of triplets and they will need money to take care of their family expenses, he will not be able to contribute to the loss of the company. Ahmed and Abdullah have disagreed with him.

Question 1 a. Using FILAC method, raise and discuss one legal issue from the fact pattern. 25 Marks b. Would your answer in (a) be different if parties never agreed on the profit-sharing formula?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Question # 1.

Fact: They had registered the company under the Company limited by share under the company registration act and they had a profit-sharing agreement different from their share of capital.

Issue: Normally the profit is distributed among the shareholders according to their share in business capital.

Law: Each member is having liability limited to the share in capital, any losses above the capital limit will be borne by the business. Profit is shared between the shareholders as per their capital.

Analysis: They had their own contract for profit sharing therefore this contract but it maynot be valid for profit sharing. and can be challenged. The contract is silent on the sharing of the loss therefore the loss-sharing will be as per the limit of the share price they owned.

Conclusion: The legal issue is the deviation from the company limited by share registration act in terms of a profit-sharing agreement. But as they had a separate contract for profit sharing therefore they should have followed the same if there was profit. But in case of loss too the same contract should be seen valid and the lossess also should be distributed in similar ratio of profit rather than their share in capital.

Question 2. If they did not had a separate contract for profit sharing then in that case the losses would have shared as per their share in capital.


Related Solutions

Case Let Analysis: Oman Commercial Vehicle Manufacturer Company is one of the largest companies in the...
Case Let Analysis: Oman Commercial Vehicle Manufacturer Company is one of the largest companies in the Sultanate of Oman. It is the third-largest manufacturer of passenger cars. Extensive quality enhancement and cost reduction task was initiated in September 2018. The outcome of this task helped the company to reach a profit of 28 million while the loss in the year ended March 2017 was 500 million. The company followed the cost cutting system and saved more than 300 million of...
Case Assume that the new entity, AMT, was established, that the board accepted Helen Grant’s recommendation...
Case Assume that the new entity, AMT, was established, that the board accepted Helen Grant’s recommendation of an annual audit for the company, and that after conducting a tender for the audit, AMT selected ABC Auditors (ABCA) to conduct the audit. Unfortunately, Helen Grant found that, for personal reasons, she was unable to continue in the new role as CFO. The case continues… ABCA was selected to conduct the audit because one of the board members of AMT was aware...
The case for consolidated financial statements (CFS) presumes that the separate legal entity principle can be...
The case for consolidated financial statements (CFS) presumes that the separate legal entity principle can be ignored. Is this presumption valid, in your view? Explain your position.
LQU Company SAOG (the "Company") is an Omani joint stock company registered under the Commercial Companies Law of the Sultanate of Oman.
Case Study 1:LQU Company SAOG (the "Company") is an Omani joint stock company registered under the Commercial Companies Law of the Sultanate of Oman. The registered address, principal office and the manufacturing facility is located at Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. The Company's shares are listed in the Muscat Securities Market. The principal activities of the company are the manufacture and sale of shipping equipment including associated works.The given below are the details of the balances as at the end of...
Explain the concept of the separate legal entity of a company from its owner
Explain the concept of the separate legal entity of a company from its owner
Genuine assent-how to create-it or destroy it. Review what comes under this legal/contract concept.
Genuine assent-how to create-it or destroy it. Review what comes under this legal/contract concept.
Question A.1 Internal rules control the relationship between the company as a separate legal entity and...
Question A.1 Internal rules control the relationship between the company as a separate legal entity and its two main constituents – its members and officers (e.g. directors and company secretary). Identify and explain the ways companies can set up their internal rules briefly.  
Before completing the assignment, please review the Summary Case, Niles v. City of San Rafael in...
Before completing the assignment, please review the Summary Case, Niles v. City of San Rafael in your text (pgs. 198-199). In this case, negligence was successfully established against both the pediatrician and the hospital. Please reason through the elements of negligence as presented in this case and establish a case against both the pediatrician and hospital individually, utilizing the elements of negligence and the facts presented to make your case.
A company manufacturing biomedical devices is involved in a legal case on the basis that a...
A company manufacturing biomedical devices is involved in a legal case on the basis that a number of the devices have failed, and needed replacement, after too short a lifetime in use. The company claims to produce devices with median lifetime 96 months. However, twelve devices have reported failure times (in months) of 80.45, 87.01, 92.58, 91.66, 88.42, 96.47, 80.22, 87.41, 94.54, 95.36, 80.96, 96.66. Using a suitable nonparametric test, assess the extent of the statistical evidence supporting the legal...
Locate by either researching YouTube (i.e. news reports, etc.), a newspaper, or summary of a legal case, court document a case in healthcare where there is a lawsuit
  Locate by either researching YouTube (i.e. news reports, etc.), a newspaper, or summary of a legal case, court document a case in healthcare where there is a lawsuit. Summarize the case. Tell me who the plaintiff and defendant are. Why are the plaintiffs seeking litigation? What were the allegations? If this was negligence, was there a strong case (i.e. 4 Ds of healthcare law). 1. Duty 2. Breach of Duty 3. Direct Cause 4. Damages
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT