Question

In: Accounting

On September 1, 2017, Gelato Corp. sold goods to Bo-Chin Corporation, a new customer. Before shipping...

On September 1, 2017, Gelato Corp. sold goods to Bo-Chin Corporation, a new customer. Before shipping the goods, Gelato’s credit and collections department conducted a procedural credit check and determined that Bo-Chin is a high-credit-risk customer. As a result, Gelato did not provide Bo-Chin with open credit by recording the sale as an account receivable. Instead, Gelato required Bo-Chin to provide a non–interest-bearing promissory note for $35,000 face value, to be repaid in one year. Bo-Chin has a credit rating that requires it to pay 12% interest on borrowed funds. Gelato pays 10% interest on a loan recently obtained from its local bank. Gelato has a December 31 year end.


What else could Gelato have done to decrease collection risk related to the sale to Bo-Chin?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Hi there! Here is the answer to your question. Hope it helps.

As Bo-chin is a high credit risk customer, giving it a long repayment period is very risky. Gelato asked Bo-chin to issue promisory note with one-year repayment time. Other than this, there could have been some other ways to reduce collection risk, which are:-

1. Ask Bo-chin to issue Letter of credit from its bank in favour of Gelato. It is a normal business practice, where the buyer's bank gives guarantee for the payment of amount due, at agreed time, to the seller, for the invoice value. Here, the credit risk transfers to the buyer's banker and seller's dues are secured.

2. Ask Bo-chin for upfront payment, offering cash discount of 2%. As given in the question, there is a difference of 2% between the interest charged by banker of Bo-chin and banker of Gelato. So, even if Gelato offers 2% cash discount, it is not losing as it would not have to pay its banker for the working capital loan, which it would have borrowed or needs to borrow to supply the order.

As Bo-chin is a new customer, Gelato should not disclose to Bo-chin about the high credit risk it entails, but make it understand that restrictions would be slowly lifted as they both develop relations and make a long-term association.


Related Solutions

On September 1, 2020, Myo Inc. sold goods to Khin Corporation, a new customer. Before shipping...
On September 1, 2020, Myo Inc. sold goods to Khin Corporation, a new customer. Before shipping the goods, Myo's credit and collections department conducted a procedural credit check and determined that Khin is a high credit-risk customer. As a result, Myo did not provide Khin with open credit by recording the sale as an account receivable. Instead, Myo required Khin to provide a non–interest-bearing promissory note for $35,000 face value, to be repaid in one year. Khin has a credit...
On June 1, Alexander Corporation sold goods to a foreign customer at a price of 1,110,000...
On June 1, Alexander Corporation sold goods to a foreign customer at a price of 1,110,000 pesos and will receive payment in three months on September 1. On June 1, Alexander acquired an option to sell 1,110,000 pesos in three months at a strike price of $0.055. Relevant exchange rates and option premiums for the peso are as follows: Date Spot Rate Put Option Premium for September 1 (strike price $0.055) June 1 $ 0.055 $ 0.0021 June 30 0.059...
On June 1, Maxwell Corporation (a U.S.-based company) sold goods to a foreign customer at a...
On June 1, Maxwell Corporation (a U.S.-based company) sold goods to a foreign customer at a price of 1,140,000 pesos and will receive payment in three months on September 1. On June 1, Maxwell acquired an option to sell 1,140,000 pesos in three months at a strike price of $0.080. The time value of the option is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, and the change in time value is recognized in net income over the life of the...
On September 31, 2054, Vault-Tec Corporation sold merchandise to a customer for $70,000. The cost of...
On September 31, 2054, Vault-Tec Corporation sold merchandise to a customer for $70,000. The cost of the merchandise was $25,000. In payment, Vault-Tec Corporation agreed to accept a 10%, 9 month note requiring the payment of interest and principal on June 30, 2055. The 10% is appropriate in this situation. Vault-Tec Corporation uses the perpetual inventory system and their year-end is December 31. Instructions: a) Prepare journal entries to record the sale of merchandise, the December 31, 2054 interest accrual,...
1. On December​ 1, 2017,​ Summit, Inc. sold machinery to a customer for​ $22,000. The customer...
1. On December​ 1, 2017,​ Summit, Inc. sold machinery to a customer for​ $22,000. The customer could not pay at the time of sale but agreed to pay 10 months later and signed a​ 10-month note at​ 10% interest. How much interest revenue was earned during​ 2018? (Round any intermediate calculations to two decimal​ places, and your final answer to the nearest​ dollar.) 2.The Allowance for Bad Debts account has a credit balance of​ $8,300 before the adjusting entry for...
On January 1, 2019, BB Jane Inc sold goods for $35,000 and offered the customer no...
On January 1, 2019, BB Jane Inc sold goods for $35,000 and offered the customer no interest and no payments for three years. $35,000 is due on December 31, 2021. The interest rate for this type of transaction is 6.75%. Required Prepare all the journal entries required for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 to account for the sale of goods all the way to the payoff of the note. Round all calculations and journal entry amounts to the nearest...
1-Numo Company purchased a new machine on September 1, 2017, at a cost of $145,000. The...
1-Numo Company purchased a new machine on September 1, 2017, at a cost of $145,000. The company estimated that the machine will have a salvage value of $25,000. The machine is expected to be used for 20,000 working hours during its 5-year life. 2-Numo Company purchased a new machine on January 1, 2017, at a cost of $145,000. The company estimated that the machine will have a salvage value of $25,000. The machine is expected to be used for 20,000...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for 120,000 FCUs with payment to be received on April 30, 2018. At the date of sale, Bernard entered into a six-month forward contract to sell 120,000 FCUs. The company properly designates the forward contract as a cash flow hedge of a foreign currency receivable. The following exchange rates apply: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to April 30, 2018) November 1, 2017 $ 0.23 $...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for 150,000 FCUs with payment to be received on April 30, 2018. At the date of sale, Bernard entered into a six-month forward contract to sell 150,000 FCUs. The company properly designates the forward contract as a cash flow hedge of a foreign currency receivable. The following exchange rates apply: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to April 30, 2018) November 1, 2017 $ 0.26 $...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for...
On November 1, 2017, Bernard Company (a U.S.-based company) sold merchandise to a foreign customer for 250,000 FCUs with payment to be received on April 30, 2018. At the date of sale, Bernard entered into a six-month forward contract to sell 250,000 FCUs. The company properly designates the forward contract as a cash flow hedge of a foreign currency receivable. The following exchange rates apply: Date Spot Rate Forward Rate (to April 30, 2018) November 1, 2017 $ 0.36 $...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT